Situation Ethics Flashcards
antinomian ethics
do not recognise the role of law in morality
- no fixed moral principles
- ethics are spontaneous
- no guidance so rejected by Fletcher
legalistic ethics
law-based moral decision making
fixed moral laws to be obeyed at all times
an elaborate system of expectations and compromise
rejected in the 1960s
too strict so rejected by Fletcher
teleological ethics
moral goodness is determined by the end result
situational ethics
focused on the situation rather than fixed rules
middle ground between legalistic and antinomian
Fletcher believes in the absolute rule of love but that it must be applied situationally
relativism
the rejection of absolute moral standards such as laws or rights
Good and bad are relative to an individual or community or in Fletcher’s case to love
agape
unconditional love
the only ethical norm in a situation
extrinsically good
good defined with reference to the end consequences rather than good in itself
Fletcher argued only love is intrinsically good
conscience
term may be used and understood in many different ways
Fletcher described it as a function rather than a faculty
pragmatism
acting in moral situations in a way that is practical rather than purely ideological
personalism
ethics centred on people rather than laws
contextual relativism
we must judge each situation/context and do the most loving thing in each
means whatever we do may differ between situations but why we do it never changes
positivism
proposes something as true and good with demonstrating it
Fletcher posits love as good
what did Fletcher argue are the three possible approaches to moral life
legalism
antinomianism
situationism
why does Fletcher reject legalism
cannot accommodate exceptions to the rule
argues if you can reject one aspect of the law surely you reject it all
why does he reject antinomionism
it provides no foundation with which to evaluate one’s morality
offers no justification as to why people should live in any other way than they want to
what did Fletcher emphasise
the importance and role of the conscience in moral decision making
how is conscience traditionally understood by religious believers
as the voice of God giving us divine guidance by some intuition or part of reason which makes value judgements
how does Freud see conscience
as nothing more than the internalised values of our culture