Christian Moral Principles Flashcards
for many Christians what things are all a part of moral decision making
- how church tradition makes sense of the Bible and how they make sense of both
- the Bible takes its authority from the Church, whose authority determined its size, shape and content
what approach do Protestants take
- scripture, church tradition and reason all important in interpreting moral messages of Jesus in today’s world
- ## reason needed to make sense of scripture and tradition
what approach do the Catholics take
- Sacred Tradition is a separate stream of moral guidance - the oral tradition that Jesus passed to his followers by word of mouth and by living with them
- passed down through generations under authority of apostles and pope
- reason also offers direct access to God’s moral teachings
- there is one source and one revelation, the two streams and the two streams cannot be in conflict with one another but must be mutually interpreting and connecting
what order of priority do Catholics and Protestants take
Catholics put tradition first then the Bible followed by the magisterium and then reason
Protestants put Bible first then some emphasises tradition and then reason
give a brief overview of those that value love
- some Christians se morality centred on agape
- if love is an ultimate law that informs moral decisions might lead to more flexible approach to morals as with situation ethics
- but it might inspire a fervent wish for a more and just loving world that does not abandon moral rules
what is propositional knowledge
knowing or accepting that something is so - such as when your birthday is or the French word for please
has a truth value - can be true or false or somewhere in between
conveyed through language where statements and claims are made
what is propositional faith and revelation
- acceptance of truths revealed by God as propositions to be accepted
- God speaks to people in words, passing information to his listeners
- such truths might be the words of scripture, Creeds, Church doctrines, Confessions or Reformers
- reveal how God will save them from sin, information about Jesus and moral standards demanded by God and life after death
- not accessible through reason or experience of the world
what is non propositional knowledge
- knowing how to do something and gain skills through the procedures of experience
- procedural knowledge
- knowing how to ride a bike
- knowledge increases the more you practice them
what is non propositional faith and revelation
- belief or faith in God through personal encounter, gaining knowledge of God through experience of a sense of God’s presence and guidance e.g.
- some may experience God through nature or by meeting risen Christ in human experience
- God reveals himself and the person has faith in that self revelation
how do propositional and non propositional knowledge work together
- in everyday life
- we combine factual knowledge with experience to achieve what we need to do
- the two different ways of explaining how God reveals truths are not incompatible or mutually exclusive
- most Christians would say they learn about God through the words of the Bible and see him in nature and their relationships with others
what is necessary in reading the Bible
some knowledge of linguistics and history to make sense of the words used and how they may accurately be interpreted to capture their sense
what is a propositional approach to the Bible
- accepts as truth the words of the Bible are messages from God
- God directly revealed to the reader through words on the page
- leads some Christians to view the Commandments and Beatitudes as fixed moral principles to be transmitted, the life and work of Jesus as actual events and parables as having fixed meanings
what is a non propositional approach to the Bible
- when God revealed himself in Jesus he didn’t write a book or set of propositions but lived a human life and died a human death
- more personal and experiential approach to the Bible
- Many Christians understand the story of Jesus life, death, resurrection as speaking to their life and experiences in life
- the Bible is a gateway into encountering the living God
how might one think of the difference between propositional and non propositional approaches to the Bible
getting to know someone through their CV (prop) `and getting to know someone by having dinner with them (non -prop)
what is sola scriptura
- Bible directly reveals God’s will
- supreme authority in all matters of doctrine/practice
- God’s biblical ethical commands should be followed - such as the commandments - Exodus 20:1-17
- scripture is self-authenticating - any rational reader can see the meaning which presents itself
- it is its own interpreter - scripture interprets scripture - the meaning is overt and clear
- bible offers propositional revelation and that revelation includes clear teachings on morality
why do some Christians say the bible is literal an quote to support
- almost as if it was dictated by God to the writers word by word
- writers are not authors but scribes
- bible considered to have authority for Christians because it was inspired by God
- “no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’ own interpretation. Prophets, though human, spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit” - 2 Peter 1:20-21
“Then the Lord reached out his hand and touched my mouth and said to me I have put my words in your mouth” - Jeremiah 1:9
what Christian believe the authority and inspiration of scripture is due to its direct revelation of God through his command of scribes
evangelical Protestants
what are advantages of belief that the Bible is inspired directly without mistake from God
- helpful for moral matters as it makes the Bible an infallible source of information
- believers know they can trust/rely on what it says
- gives the right answer whenever it provides ethical and life guidance
what is the inerrancy of scripture
the Bible has no errors or mistakes
how do bible believing Christians see other sources of morality guidance
as suspicious as they could be the product of evil
what is Richard Mouw’s case for the role of biblical imperatives in a quote
“if the command to love is the only biblical command which has normative relevance to moral decision making, then much of the substance of Christian ethics can be established without reference to the scripture”
“But if the Bible does offer other commands and considerations which bear on our decision making, then the task will be one of finding correlations between biblical revelation and moral issues at many different points”
what does Mouv reject
those who take a situational approach or those who focus on love exclusively
- just because there is one biblical commandment, a law of love, does not rule the possibility of other biblical commandments on other issues which also matter
what is Mouv careful to note
- not all biblical commandments are about morality today - God told Abraham to leave his home to find the promise land but this was a specific command for him at the time and not one Christians should follow today
- it would be wrong to see the Bible as a whole long list of commands
- there is not much in the Bible that is not a command - in the histories and poems for example
what does Mouv conclude
“the writer of Ecclesiastes suggests our whole duty consists in obeying God’s commandments he is telling us that we must conform to whatever God requires of us… whether that guidance is transmitted through parables, accounts of divine dealings with nations and individuals or sentences which embody commands”
how is the approach to life shaped for a Christian who uses sola scriptura
- framed by the commandments and teachings like the Sermon on the Mount
- Decisions about taking life informed by the commandment not to kill and the teachings of Jesus on life e.g.
- Issues which are not directly mentioned in the Bible such as genetic or business ethics may be approached with references to the virtues implied by the teaching of Jesus
- Truthfulness, an important quality from Sermon on Mount may be used to inform business ethics
- different ways to draw on the Bible, different kinds of scripture
- history or saga though may not be as easy to draw as the direct teachings of Jesus although there might be parallels between the history recorded in the Bible and present issues such as conflicts or questions of good government.
what is the criticism of sola scriptura about reading the Bible ‘straight’
- critics say impossible to read straight without making any interpretation of it
- we bound to read subjectively in relation to our own experiences and with our own interpretations because we are all human individuals with our own lives and thoughts and contexts
- we cannot separate ourselves from that
- to read the Bible and try and understand it literally is a subjective choice as much as any other
why are there difficulties in sola scriptura with reference to taking a literal view of the Bible been dictated by God
- If God dictated every word why does the Bible have different writing styles
- John’s Gospel is more mystical and theological suggesting different influence, Matthew’s gives allusions to Jewish culture suggesting he expected readers to be Jewish and that he was, but Luke pauses to explain aspects of Judaism as if the reader is unfamiliar with them
- Mark’s Greek not good like other gospel writers
- difficult to accept Bible dictated directly by God
what is the problem with sola scriptura with reference to conflicts in the Bible
- Jesus’ teachings in Mathew 5 from Sermon on Mount contradict with earlier teachings in OT
- if God wrote every word why would he not be consistent
- rules in OT that Christians do not follow such as in Book of Leviticus that don’t seem to be refer to morality or be applicable to moral issues
- e.g. Leviticus 19:27 prohibits cutting hair in a certain way that many Christians do they don’t feel constrained by the teaching
- if the whole Bible is believed to be literally true then explanations are needed to deal with internal contradictions and why many rules in OT are ignored
what criticism of sola scriptura is given by Savitri Hensman
- an activist
- she criticises the Bible needing no interpretation
- She speaks of a Christian who read the ‘plain’ meaning of the Bible to inspire him to commit what most people would see as atrocities
- he sees them as perfectly acceptable and that he is a soldier of Christ
- demonstrates even when we thinking we read the Bible straight and its plain meaning we are still applying our own interpretations because most other devout Christians would not see this meaning as plain if it allows a horror to be committed
- illustrates the wariness with which we must approach a literal or bible alone reading of scripture as there is much in the Bible which arguably prevents an incorrect view of a vengeful and merciless god
discuss in detail the Catholic approach to Christian ethics
- believe the Bible grew out of the church
- the church formed the canon of scripture (bible)
- this makes Church tradition a living expression of the Good News and a living source of access to God’s revelation
- the Bible is the principal source of authority (prima scritpura) but is understood through and with the Church traditions and human reason