Similarities + differences for theories Flashcards
1
Q
State the similarities/differences between Hard + Soft Behaviourism
A
Similarities;
- There both physicalist theories
- They both focus on explaining mental states + behaviour
Differences;
- Ryles argues dispositions are indefinitely heterogenous whereas Hempel argues there’s finite translations
- There’s translation of statements for Hempel whereas Ryles places explicit emphasis on dispositions
- Hard behaviourism ficuses on translating statements + argues this can be achieved without loss of meaning to talk exclusively of behaviour/physical whereas Soft behaviourism focuses on category mistakes.
2
Q
State the similarities/differences between Behaviourism + Eliminative Materialism
A
Similarities;
- There both physicalist
- They both reject qualia + mental states
- Both theories are that language ultimately confuses us ie eliminativism argues folk psychology is the problem + behaviourism argues its a category mistake
Differences;
- For behaviourism mental states are just
behaviour whereas for eliminativism the other the actual language + way in which we talk about the mind/the mental needs to be changed - Eliminativism places emphasis on neuroscine
having the answers but Hard Behaviourism is a translation project - Behavourism rejects talk of mental concepts whereas Eliminativism mental concepts that they need to changed.
3
Q
State the similartities/differences between functionalism + behaviourism
A
Similarities;
- Both agree mental states CAN be understood in terms of physical properties ie behaviourism there fully reducible to talk exclusively of the physical + functionalism argues mental states can be reducible to physical functional properties in some cases
Differences;
- Functionalism is ontologically neutral they just tend to be physicalists whereas behaviourists are physicalist
- Functionalism argues metal states can eb understood in terms of ontologically natural functional properties + inputs/outputs whereas behaviourism argues mental states are purely behaviour