Seligman Et Al Flashcards

1
Q

What was the main aim of Seligman et al. (1988)?

A

To replicate research showing a positive correlation between depressive attributional style and severity of depressive symptoms

The research focused on how individuals attribute negative events and its relation to depression severity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many patients participated in the Seligman et al. (1988) study?

A

Fifty-one patients

The sample included 39 unipolar and 12 bipolar patients.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What tools were used to measure depressive symptoms in the study?

A

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ)

ASQ involved making attributions about 12 hypothetical events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the duration of cognitive therapy in the study?

A

Six months

Patients attended weekly therapy sessions during this period.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What correlation was found in the results of the study?

A

Positive correlation between depressive attributions for negative events and severity of depressive symptoms

This correlation held true before and after therapy and at follow-up assessments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How did the scores of pessimism in the non-depressed group compare to the depressed group?

A

Scores were lower for pessimism in the non-depressed control group

This suggests that depressive attributional styles are less prevalent in non-depressed individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What relationship was observed between therapy and changes in depressive symptoms?

A

The greater the decrease in pessimism in therapy, the greater the improvement in depressive symptoms

This indicates that cognitive changes can lead to symptom relief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was a key finding regarding the stability of explanatory/attributional style?

A

Explanatory/attributional style was fairly stable over time in the control group

This suggests that pessimism may be a trait rather than a temporary state influenced by mood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Did the study find a significant difference in pessimism between unipolar and bipolar disorder?

A

No significant difference in pessimism scores was found

The average number of therapy sessions was 22.5.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was linked to the risk of relapse at 12 months?

A

Pessimism scores at the end of therapy

This indicates that even patients who benefited from therapy could be at risk of relapse based on their attributional style.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

True or False: The study concluded that people with depression favor external, specific, and unstable attributions of negative events.

A

False

People with depression tend to favor internal, global, and stable attributions of negative events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fill in the blank: People with both unipolar and bipolar disorder share a cognitive attributional style which favors _______ attributions of negative events.

A

internal, global, and stable

This cognitive style is distinct from that of non-depressed individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the average number of therapy sessions attended?

A

22.5 sessions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What method was used for the initial data collection?

A

Interview using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (SADS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many participants were reassessed within a month of their last therapy session?

A

32 participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How many participants were followed up 12 months later?

A

26 participants

17
Q

What was the purpose of comparing findings with a matched control group?

A

To compare with non-depressed participants