SECTION B: Functionalist perspective on Education: Flashcards
What are the two approaches to this approach:
Consensus Theorists and Conflict Theorists.
Three key thinkers:
- Emile Durkheim.
- Talcott Parsons.
- Davis and Moore.
Functionalism and education:
- Helps to develop the human resource if an industrialisation through its selection process to allocate individuals to the various levels of occupations.
- Also contributes to social cohesion by transmitting to new generations the central values of society.
Emile Durkheim: Socialisation:
- Concerned that education should emphasise the moral responsibilities that members of society have towards each other and the wider society.
Durkheim: Education and social solidarity:
- All societies needed to create some kind of social solidarity.
- In pre-industrial societies, social solidarity was created by people sharing common experience as part of families and through shared religious rituals.
- Education plays a role in instilling a sense of shared culture and identity in the younger generation.
Durkheim: Division of Labour:
- Education was also preparing young people for the world of work, in the industrial societies where there is more competitive labour.
- Individuals can choose from a range of specialist jobs.
- Schools can therefore provide the specialist skills and knowledge requites of an industrial workforce which families themselves may it be able to deliver.
AO3: Evaluation on Durkheim: Strength:
- Durkheim’s vision of socialisation has successfully reinforced this idea that schools have a duty to prepare the young people for both the economy and the wider society.
- Durkheim’s vision of education and social solidarity creates a sense of unity for the young people.
- Durkheim vision division of labour offers an equal opportunity for everyone and aims to support the least privilege families by offering a free education.
AO3: Evaluation on Durkheim: Weakness:
- Durkheim’s vision of socialisation creates this oppressive system in which makes schooling unwelcoming for young people.
- Durkheim’s vision of education and social solidarity reinforces cultural homogenisation in a diverse community.
- Durkheim’s vision of education and social solidarity normalises the class division for the lower-class, ensuring that they accept the upper-class ideology.
- Durkheim division of labour doesn’t seem to accompany any other family type that isn’t a nuclear family such as single-parent family.
Social solidarity:
A feelings of unity and belonging based on shared beliefs and value.
Schools presenting unity and belonging:
- Students being allocated uniforms symbolises unity and belonging.
- British values.
- Equality and diversity.
- Citizenship.
Talcott Parsons: Skills Provision:
- Agrees with Durkheim.
- Education forms a bridge between the family and the wider society. By socialising children to adapt to the meritocratic view of achievement.
Conclusions drawn from Talcott Parsons:
- Education should socialise young people into a Conesus agreement.
- Key concepts include particularistic and universalistic values.
- Particularistic standards = children are treated as particular individuals. Socialised within the family.
- Universalistic standards = people are judged according to standards that people apply equally to everybody. Found in society as a whole.
- Schools should be meritocratic and based upon equality of opportunity.
Meritocratic:
Relating to or characteristic of a society in which power is held by people selected according to merit.
AO3: EVALUATION: Talcott Parsons: Strength:
- Argues that education should be an equal opportunity for everyone regardless of their class status.
AO3: EVALUATION: Talcott Parsons: Weakness:
- State schools will never have the same opportunity as privates school.
- The meritocratic system doesn’t accompany everyone’s future.