Section 6(1)(a) - Imports/exports Flashcards
Common actions/methods of drug importers:
- have drugs concealed in their person, or in their luggage
- have another person (a ‘mule’) bring the drugs in for them
- send or have drugs sent by international mail or courier
- conceal drugs inside legitimate goods, for example within shipping containers
Definition of ‘imports’ as per s5?
s5(a) in relation to any goods, means the arrival of the goods in New Zealand in any manner, whether lawfully or unlawfully, from a point outside New Zealand
A summary of the importing process?
Commences at the point of origin and continues until the drugs have reached the ultimate destination in New Zealand
Criminal liability arises as soon as the drugs cross New Zealand’s border
process of importation continues whilst the goods are in transit
Anyone who knowingly assists in facilitating the process up until that point may be liable as a party to the importation
Mens rea of importing?
the crown must prove:
- the defendants conduct in some way contributed to the actual importation of the drug
- the defendants guilty knowledge
this includes proof that the defendant:
knew about the important, and
knew it was a controlled drug, and
intended to cause the importation.
Wilful blindness
In terms of proving guilty knowledge, proof that the defendant deliberately turned a blind eye to the facts will suffice.
Case law, R v Martin
Definition of New Zealand as per s5?
s5(a) New Zealand means the land and the waters enclosed by the outer limits of the territorial sea of New Zealand
Definition of controlled drug
Means any substance, preparation, mixture, or article specified or described in schedule 1, schedule 2, or schedule 3 to this Act; and includes any controlled drug analogue
Definition of a controlled drug analogue
Any substance that has a structure substantially similar to that of any controlled drug, but does not include-
(a) any substance specified in schedules 1 2 or 3 of this Act
(b) any pharmacy only medicine or prescription medicine
(c) an approved product within the Psychoactive Substances Act 2013
Definition of a Class A controlled drug
Controlled drugs specified or described in schedule 1 of the MODA75
Their misuse poses a very high risk of harm to individuals or society
Types of class A controlled drugs
cocaine heroin LSD methamphetamine shrooms
Definition of a class B controlled drug
Controlled drugs specified or described in schedule 2 of the MODA75
Drugs that pose a high risk of harm to individuals or society
Types of class B controlled drugs
Amphetamine Cannabis preparations (oil or hashish) GHB/Fantasy MDMA/Ecstasy Morphone Opium Pseudoephedrine Ephedrine
Definition of Class C controlled drug
means the controlled drugs specified or described in schedule C to the MODA75
Drugs that pose a moderate risk of harm to individuals or society
Types of class C controlled drugs
Cannabis plant
cannabis seed
BZP
Controlled drug analogues
Mistake as to nature of a controlled drug
Guilty knowledge is an essential elements, section 29 provides that is not a defence that the defendant did not know the substance in question was a particular controlled drug
(i.e. not a defence to mistake heroin for cocaine)
Proving a usable quantity
It is necessarily that the drug be of a usable quantity
Under section 29(A), it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove that fact unless the defendant put the matter in issue
Saxton v Police
Imports
To import includes “to introduce from abroad or cause to be brought in from a foreign country”
R v Hancox
the bringing of goods into the country or causing them to be brought into the country does not cease as the aircraft or vessel enters New Zealand’s territorial limits. Importing into NZ for the purposes of 6(1)(a) is a process. The element of importing exists from the time the goods enter NZ until the reach their immediate destination”
R v Strawbridge
It is not necessary for the crown to establish knowledge on the part of the accused. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, knowledge on hr part will be presumed, but if there is some evidence that the accused honestly believed on reasonable grounds that her ct was innocent, then she is entitled to be acquitted unless the jury is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that this was not so.
Police v Emirali
the serious offence of possessing a narcotic does not extend to some minute and useless residue of the substance.