Electronic Operations Flashcards
Definition of private communication
means a communication (oral, written, telecommunication, or otherwise) made under circumstances that may reasonably be taken to indicate that any party to the communication desires it to be confined to the parties to the communication
does not include communication that in the circumstances any party to the communication ought to reasonably expect that the communication may be intercepted
Definition of an interception device
means any electronic, mechanical, electromagnetic, optical, or electro-optical instrument, apparatus, equipment, or other device that is used or capable of being used to intercept or record a private communication
does not include a hearing aid or similar device used to correct subnormal hearing of the user to no better than normal hering
Definition of a visual surveillance device
means any electronic, mechanical, electromagnetic, optical, or electro-optical instrument, apparatus, equipment, or other device that is used or capable of being used to observe, or observe and record, a private activity
but does not include spectacles, contact lenses, or a similar device that correct sub normal vision of the user to no better the normal vision
Definition of visual trespass surveillance
not defined in the act but but can be taken to mean trespass surveillance involving the use of a visual surveillance device
Definition of a surveillance device:
- an interception device
- a tracking device
- a visual surveillance device
Definition of a tracking device:
a device that may be used to help ascertain, by electronic or other means, either or both of the following:
a. the location of a thing or person
b. whether a thing has been opened, tampered with, or in some other way dealt with
does not include a vehicle of other means of transport
When a surveillance device is concerned, the Search and Surveillance Act restricts surveillance activity in what kinds of places?
in places an individual “ought to reasonably expect” are private
What is the offence threshold for trespass surveillance when using a surveillance device?
for offences punishable by 7 ears imprisonment or more (or against certain sections of the Arms Act)
Section 46 of S&S Act?
Activities for which a surveillance device warrant is required:
a) using a interception device to intercept private communication
b) use of a tracking device
c) observation of private activity on private premises
d) use of a surveillance device that involves trespass to land and/or goods
e) observation of a private activity in the curtilage of a private premise, and any recording of that observation, if the observation or recording exceeds the curtilage threshold
Section 47 of the S &S Act 2012?
Activities that do not require a warrant.
a) an enforcement officer is lawfully in a private premise, is recording what he or she see or hears
b) covert audio of a voluntary oral communication between 2 or more people where at least 1 person has consented
c) activities carried out by the enforcement officers use of a surveillance device, if that use is authorised under any enactment other than this Act
Restrictions on the use of an Interception device?
Restricted to obtaining evidential material for serious offences only:
- offences punishable by 7 years imprisonment or more
- certain Arms Act 1983 offences
Voluntary oral communication?
A voluntary oral communication is a communication between one or more persons where at least one person in the communication gives their consent for the communication to be recorded. There is no requirement for a surveillance device warrant
Situations of emergency?
Section 48 authorises police to use a surveillance device without warrant in certain emergency situations, where the offence is:
- punishable by 14 years or more
- an arms act 1983 offence
- a drug offence
- likely to cause injury or serious property/loss damage
- presenting risk to life and safety
Section 48(2)(e) of the Search and Surveillance Act?
is the specific provision relating to drug offences in situation of emergency:
“the enforcement officer has reasonable grounds:
(i) to suspect an offence has, is, will, be committed in relation to a controlled drug (schedule 1,2,3 of MODA75), and;
(ii) to believe that the use of a surveillance device would obtain evidential material in relation to that offence.
R v MgGinty
Alternate investigative techniques
the judge is not required to refuse to issue a warrant merely because Police have not exhausted every conceivable alternative investigative technique