Section 5. The Racial State 1933-41 Flashcards
What was the first Nazi policy against the Jews?
The boycott of Jewish shops
What were the Nuremberg laws?
-In 1935, the Nazi regime extended the anti semitic legislation through the Nuremberg laws, so called because they were announced at the annual party rally at Nuremberg
-By 1935, many fanatical anti semites in the Nazi movement were restless because they believed Nazi persecution of the Jews had not gone far enough. They urged Hitler to move further and faster. These radicals became the driving force behind the demands for anti Jewish legislation. At the Nuremberg party rally in 1935, Hitler announced that the that the communist international had declared war on Nazism and that it was time to ‘deal once and for all with Jewish-Bolshevism’
What were the 3 distinct phases in the development of the Nazi regime?
- The legal revolution, 1933-34. When Hitler came to power in 1933, he depended on political allies. Hitler could not completely prevent the radical SA’s violence, but he controlled it as much as he could. He consolidated his power by legal means
- Creating the New Germany, 1934-37. By August 1934, the Nazi regime was secure, but Hitler still not have a free hand. He worried about public opinion both at home and abroad. One example of this was the Olympic Games in Berlin in 1936. Before and during the games, Nazi anti semitism was put under wraps while Nazi propaganda projected the image of Germany as a civilised society. Between 1934 and 1937, Hitler avoided confronting powerful groups like the army or the churches. He also knew that Germany was not yet ready for a war, whatever the propaganda said
- The radicalisation of the state, 1938-39. By the end of 1937, the Nazi regime was far stronger than in 1933. The economy had recovered. The SS completely controlled the police system. Hitler felt that Germany was militarily ready for war. In 1938 and 1939, therefore, the Nazis took control of the army, sacking it’s 2 most important commanders, Bloomberg and Fritsch. He also let loose radical persecution of his ‘racial enemies’
What is social Darwinism and race theory?
-Social Darwinism was a theory that was widely discussed in nineteenth century Europe. Social Darwinists adapted Darwin’s scientific principles of natural biological selection to rather unscientific theories about human society in order to justify ideas of racial superiority and the theory of eugenics.
-In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, many social Darwinists put forward theories designed to justify European imperialism, by arguing that ‘advanced’ Europeans had the right and responsibility to rule over ‘inferior’ or ‘backward’ colonial peoples.
-In Sweden, there was an influential group of scientists seeking to eliminate disabilities through population planning and birth control. Many of these ideas were incorporated into Nazi ideology
What was Hitler’s obsession with ‘biological struggle’?
-Hitler’s obsession with this ‘biological struggle’ between different races easily fitted with his view of the Jews. He viewed humanity as consisting of a hierarchy of races: the Jews, black people and the Slavs were inferior races, while the the ‘Herrenvolk’ (master race) was the Aryan peoples of Northern Europe
-Another key Nazi idea was the need to ‘purify’ the stronger races by eliminating the ‘germs’ that threatened to poison them through inter marriage with so called ‘degenerate’ races
-Hitler believed that it was the destiny of Aryans to rule over the inferior races
-In order to ensure their success in this racial struggle, it was vital for Aryans to maintain their racial purity
What were the Nazi principles of ‘racial hygiene’?
-The nazi principles of ‘racial hygiene’ justified the sterilisation (or eliminating altogether’ of the mentally and physically disabled, the Roma and other ‘racial undesirables’ such as homosexuals, pacifists and Jehovah’s witnesses
-This theme of removing racial enemies ran through much of the more extreme Nazi propaganda of the 1920s
What was the Volksgemeinschaft?
-Hitler’s concept of Volksgemeinschaft (‘peoples community) was not inclusive of all people living in Germany. In a way that was typical of many other aspects of Nazi ideology: the concept of the national community was twisted by anti semitism and racial thinking. The key word was the ‘volk’.
-To qualify as a member of the Volk it was essential to be a true German, both in terms of loyalty and of racial purity
-To protect the Volk, it was essential to ruthlessly eliminate all un German elements, especially the Jews. So the best way of defining the Volk came through identifying the racial enemies to be excluded from it, rather than the people who naturally belonged to it
-Membership of the Volksgemeinschaft was reserved for those of Aryan race, members of which were expected to be genetically healthy, socially efficient and politically reliable
What was Lebensraum?
-The nazi ideal of Lebensraum (living space) was yet another example of an ideological concept being twisted by anti semitism. Like social Darwinism, the idea of Lebensraum was not new, nor originated by Hitler and the Nazi’s
-In the later nineteenth century, many European thinkers had proposed opening up space for the expanding populations of the superior white race
-In Germany, there was widespread support for the idea that the country was already over populated and that industrious German farmers needed more land. Many argued that Germany’s destiny lay in the east, conquering the supposedly inferior Slav peoples of Poland and the former Russian Empire to gain access to fertile farmland and raw materials
-Nazi ideology fitted in smoothly with these ideas about Germany’s destiny to expand eastwards, but Hitler’d concept of Lebensraum had a particular focus on race
-Lebensraum would not only allow for the ‘Germanisation’ of the eastern lands and bringing the ‘lost Germans’ back to the Reich.
-More importantly it would provide the battleground for a war of racial annihilation, wiping out the inferior Slav races and smashing Bolshevism in Russia
What were the different policies towards disabled people between 1933-41?
-Sterilisation
-Euthanasia
What was the policy of sterilisation towards disabled people?
-Even before the Nazis came to power, the state government of Prussia had drawn up a draft law to allow the voluntary sterilisation of those with hereditary conditions. In July 1933, the Nazis took this further by introducing the law for prevention of hereditary diseased progeny (sterilisation law), which introduced compulsory sterilisation for certain categories of ‘inferiors’
-This law specified the ‘hereditary diseases’ that sterilisation was to be applied to: congenital ‘feeble-mindedness’; schizophrenia etc
-Later amendments permitted sterilisation of children over 10 years, and the use of force to carry it out after 14 years, with no right to legal representation
-2 years later, the law was amended to permit abortions in cases where those deemed suitable for sterilisation were already pregnant. In 1936, x ray sterilisation of women over 38 years was introduced (due to the higher risk of children being born with disabilities)
-In the opposite direction, there was a ban on abortion and contraception for Aryan women and girls in an attempt to increase the birth rate
Who made decisions about sterilisation?
-Decisions about sterilisation were made at hereditary health courts. Most of the judges were strongly in favour of the sterilisation policy. The decision process often took only 10 minutes. The operation took place, by force if necessary, within 2 weeks
-60% of those sterilised were ‘feeble-minded’, categorised as suffering from idiocy or imbecility
-The idea of ‘moral insanity’ was also used as a basis for sterilisation
-This was often merely an excuse to prevent births among the ‘criminal underclass’ or ‘anti socials’
-During the third Reich 400,000 people were sterilised
What was the policy of euthanasia towards disabled people?
-The Nazi desire to create their ‘master race’ did not stop at sterilisation and banning sexual relationships between aryans and Jews. By October 1939, the regime had authorised so called ‘euthanasia’ for people with mental health conditions, learning disabilities and physical disabilities and physical disabilities, regarded by the Nazis as an ‘unproductive burden’ on Germany’s resources and as a threat to ‘racial hygeine’ and the ‘biological strength of the volk’
-The openly stated ‘solution’ was to pass new legislation allowing mentally and physically disabled children to be ‘mercifully’ put to death and so ‘relieve the burden on the national community’.
What was the first ‘euthanasia programme’?
-The first so-called ‘euthanasia programme’ for disabled children originated from one specific case of a badly disabled child early in 1939. The child’s father wrote a personal letter to Hitler asking for his child, ‘this creature’ as he called him, to be put to sleep
-Dr Philip’s Bouhler, made sure the letter was brought to Hitler’s attention
-Hitler sent a senior SS doctor, Karl Brandt, to examine the baby
-Brandt’s report advised ‘euthanasia’ for the child
-Hitler approved the report and issued a directive announcing that he would personally protect from prosecution the doctors who carried out ‘mercy killings’
-This one case was the catalyst for the whole so-called ‘euthanasia programme’. Hitler gave Philipp Boulher authority to decide on similar cases in the future
-All petitions were to go through the ‘chancellory of the Fuhrer’
-Hitler also made it clear any such actions were to be kept secret.
-The technical and administrative methods used to kill more than 5000 innocent children, deemed by the Nazis to be ‘incurable’ and worthless to society, would be applied later to Jewish people in occupied Europe.
What was the T4 programme?
-From October 1939, the programme was rapidly extended and later moved to new, larger headquarters in Berlin, Tiergarten 4. It was from this address that the name by which the so-called ‘euthanasia programme’ is best known, Aktion T4, originated
-The basis of T4 was bureaucracy and paperwork. Forms about patients were to be filled in at clinics and asylums, and passed on to assessors, who were paid on a piecework basis to encourage them to process as many patients as possible
-Those who made judgements of life and death did so without having to look the patients in the eyes, but rather simply looked at forms. Some doctors took part because they were careerists. Several doctors and nurses complained about the programme, but their objections were ignored
What happened with the end of the T4 programme?
-By 1941, rumours about the policy of euthanasia were spreading widely and aroused opposition. One public official filed a complaint with the Reich justice ministry and also an accusation of murder against Philipp boulher.
-These proceedings got nowhere, but they worried the regime. From July 1940, there was also a groundswell of protests from the churches. Protestant Pastor Braune wrote a long memorandum on July 1940, protesting about the T4 programme
-On 12th August, Braune was arrested by the Gestapo. An official statement from Rome on 2nd December 1940 pronounced that the direct killing of people with hereditary conditions was against ‘the natural and positive law of God’
-On 3rd august 1941, catholic archbishop Galen of Munster preached a sermon making an emotive attack on the programme, backed by specific evidence provided by local congregation members
-On 24th august Hitler halted the programme after backlash
-However this was a rare occurrence and in many respects, the so called ‘euthanasia programme’ provided the techniques, the trained personnel and the administrative experience for the coming ‘final solution’
What were the Nazi policies towards Asocials?
-In September 1933, the regime began a mass round up of ‘tramps and beggars’, many of whom were young homeless, unemployed people. Since the Nazis did not have enough space in concentration camps to house all of these people, they began to differentiate between the ‘orderly’ and the ‘disorderly’ homeless. The ‘orderly’, who were fit, willing to work for their accommodation. The ‘disorderly’ were considered to be habitual criminals and sent to concentration camps
-In 1936, before the Olympic Games were held in Berlin, the police rounded up large numbers of ‘tramps and beggars’ from the streets of the capital in order to protect an image of hard working and dynamic society to the world.
-In 1936, an ‘asocial colony’ was set up, known as Hashude, in northern Germany. The aim of the colony was to re educate the Asocials so that they could be integrated into society
-In 1938, there was an even bigger round up of ‘beggars, tramps, pimps and gypsies’. Most of these were sent to Buchenwald concentration camp, where few survived the harsh treatment
What were the polices towards homosexuals?
-In 1934, the Gestapo began to compile lists of gay people. In that same year, the ss eliminated Rohm and other leaders of the Nazi SA who were homosexuals
-The law on homosexuality was amended in 1935 to widen the definition of homosexuality and to impose harsher penalties for those convicted. After the law was changed, over 22,000 men were arrested and imprisoned between 1936 and 38
-In 1936, Himmler created the Reich office for the combatting of homosexuality and abortion
-Overall, some 100,000 men were arrested for homosexuality, of whom about 50,000 were convicted. Even when the men were arrested had served their sentences, they were immediately re arrested by the Gestapo or SS and held in concentration camps under ‘preventive custody’
-In the camps, they had to wear a pink triangle to distinguish them from other prisoners and they were subjected to particularly brutal treatment by the guards
-Many of those imprisoned were subjected to ‘voluntary castration’ to ‘cure’ them of their ‘perversion’
-Gay men who would not agree to abandon their sexual orientation were sent to concentration camps were they were subjected to unusually harsh treatment. Many were beaten to death. It has been estimated that about 60% of gay prisoner died in the camps
-Lesbians did not suffer the same degree of persecution as they were considered to be ‘asocial’ rather than degenerate
What was the reason for exclusion of Religous sects?
Aroused nazi suspicions about loyalties
What were the policies towards religious sects?
Where sects were allowed to continue gestapo agents attended and reported on their services
How did the policies against religious sects help achieve Volksgemeinschaft?
Ensures everyone loyal towards nazis and not anything else
What were the consequences of polices towards religious sects?
By 1945 around 10,000 Jehovah’s witnesses had been imprisoned and many had died
What was the reason for exclusion of the Roma and the sinti?
They provided a threat to Aryan racial purity