3. The Collapse Of Democracy (1928-33) Flashcards

1
Q

What were the core beliefs and ideology of communists (KPD)?

A

Revolutionary communist ideology. Demanded end to cuts in unemployment benefits and wages, and the legislation of abortion, also advocated close cooperation with the USSR, the end of military spending and the establishment of a workers state. Ultimate aim to overthrow Weimar Republic. Priority after depression was to replace SPD as leading party on the left.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are some examples of communist campaigning and propaganda?

A

Posters and speeches by Thälmann: emphasised class struggle and the smashing of the capitalist system. There were explicit appeals to the unemployed, as for example in the slogan ‘Bread and freedom’, and there were images of capitalist capitalists being smashed with hammers wielded by workers. Much of the KPD’s propaganda attacked the SPD as the tool of the capitalist classes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who were the main support base of the communists (KPD)?

A

Strong presence in factories and workshops where trade union was well established. Forced to focus on unemployed. Presented as defenders of working class districts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the strengths of the communists (KPD)?

A

-Communist propaganda helped attract membership, particularly through it’s posters but also in the speeches of Thalmann; they emphasised class struggle and the smashing of the capitalist system
-They were explicit appeals to the unemployed, as for example in the slogan ‘bread and freedom’, and there were images of capitalists being smashed with hammers wielded by workers
-There were also posters which emphasised the KPD’s links with the USSR and it’s belief in internationalism
-Much of the KPD’s propaganda attacked the SPD as the tool of the capitalist classes. It projected an image which would appeal to it’s committed followers and to many of those whose situation had become desperate as a result of the depression
-It must be remembered that electoral support for the KPD grew through the years 1930-32 reaching a peak of 16.9% of the votes cast in the November 1932 Reichstag election
-With it’s growing membership, success in attracting votes and organisation at street and neighbourhood level, the KPD had considerable strength.
-Indeed, the perceived threat of a communist revolution frightened many middle class voters into supporting the Nazi’s and led business leaders such as Thyssen to give financial support to the Nazi’s. Hitler was very adept at playing on these fears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the weaknesses of the communists (KPD).

A

-The reality, however, was that the KPD never came close to launching a successful revolution. It’s membership turnover was very high- more than 50% of its new members in 1932 left within a few months, only to be replaced by new recruits
-It failed to attract support outside the main industrial areas and had very limited appeal amongst women
-Because a high proportion of it’s members were unemployed, the KPD was forever short of money
-Finally, it’s concentration on fighting the ‘social facists’ in the SPD blinded the KPD to the serious threat posed by the Nazi party and divided anti nazi forces at a crucial time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the Nazi ideology?

A

-Hitler and the Nazi’s put forward a wide ranging but loose collection of ideas which, when assembled, might be described as an ideology. Nazi policy was first put forward in their twenty-five point programme of 1920, which was still officially the statement of their aims in 1933 even though Hitler did not agree with many of it’s points
-While he was in prison after the failed Munich beer hall Putsch in 1923, Hitler started writing Mein Kampf, his most complete statement of his ideas and aims
-His ideas were not original, nor where they coherent or consistent, as he modified his policy statements according to the audience he was addressing
-The book was also not widely read before 1933

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the key themes in Nazi propaganda?

A

-The power of the will
-Struggle and war
-A racial community
-A national socialism
-The Führerprinzip
-Agressive nationalism
-Anti-semitism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How was the power of the will a part of Nazi propaganda?

A

-Hitler presented himself and the Nazi movement as being a force for change in Germany: ‘If one has realised a truth, that truth is valueless so long as there is lacking the indomitable will to turn this realisation into action’ (Hitler 1922)
-Nazi propaganda claimed that power, strength and determination to succeed were qualities personified by Hitler
-The Nazi movement, with it’s parades of stormtroopers (SA), presented an image of discipline and unity that would sweep all opponents aside

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How was struggle and war a key theme of Nazi propaganda?

A

-Struggle, violence and war were at the heart of Nazi thinking and actions. Hitler defined his outlook in terms of struggle and claimed scientific justification for his view that struggle and conflict between races was part of the natural order of things
-War, he believed, would reconstruct German society and create a new German Reich through conquest and the subjugation of other races
-Nazi propaganda, therefore, glorified, the military virtues of courage, loyalty and self sacrifice, and the SA was projected as an organisation that gave German makes the chance to demonstrate their manliness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the appeal of Nazism?

A

As the economic crisis in Germany deepened, society became more polarised and the political system failed to provide governments equal to the situation. The nazis projected an image of decisiveness and energy, and offered the prospect of change. Their appeal was based on a number of factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How was a racial community a method of Nazi propaganda?

A

-The concept of a ‘peoples community’, or Volksgemeinshaft, was a key element in Nazi ideology. Although it was never defined very clearly, Hitler advocated a state based on a racial community.
-Only aryans could be citizens of the state; all others were to be denied the rights of citizenship and it’s benefits, and would be treated as mere subjects of the state.
-Within the ‘real community of the people’, there would be no social classes and all Germans would have equal chances to find their own level in society. All would work together for the good of the nation, thereby demonstrating their commitment to common ‘German values’, and in return would benefit from access to employment and welfare benefits
-Nazism thus aimed for a cultural and social revolution in Germany. The objective was to create a ‘new man’ and a ‘new woman’, individuals who would have awareness of the importance of their race, the strength of character to work unselfishly for the common good, and the willingness to follow the leadership in pursuit of their aims.
-Yet this revolutionary ideology was essentially backward-looking. When the Nazi’s talked of a ‘people’s community’, they wanted to return to a romanticised, mythical German past before the race had become ‘polluted’ with ‘alien’ blood and before industrialisation had divided society along class lines.
-Their volksermeinschaft would be based on ‘blood and soil’ that is, on the German peasants who they believed had retained their ‘racial purity’ and their traditional values more than city dwellars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How was a national socialism a method of Nazi propaganda?

A

-The Nazi’s adopted the title National Socialist German workers’ party in an attempt to gain working class support, but at the same time to differentiate themselves from the international socialism of the communist party
-The points laid out in the twenty five point programme were economically radical and were similar to many of the anti capitalist policies of the communists and the socialists
-They called, for example, for the confiscation of war profits, the nationalisation of large monopoly companies and the confiscation of land from the large estates without compensation to the landowners
-Hitler, however never fully committed to these radical aims and modified his message according to the audience he was addressing. Increasingly, after 1929, Hitler sought the support of wealthy businessmen such as Hugenberg and Fritz Thyssen, and was at pains to reassure them that a Nazi government would not threaten their interests
-Hitler used the term ‘socialism’ loosely, in a way that might appeal to working class voters. In his view, socialism and the Volksgemeinschaft were one and the same thing: ‘to be national means to act with a boundless all embracing love for the people and, if necessary, even to die for it. And similarly, to be social means to build up the state and the community of the people so that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How was the Führerprinzip a method of Nazi propaganda?

A

-Hitler set out to destroy the Weimar Republic because it was a parliamentary democracy, a system he viewed as weak, ineffective and alien to Germany’s traditions of strong, authoritarian government.
-He also believed that parliamentary democracy encouraged the growth of communism, in his opinion an even greater evil
-He argued in a speech in April 1922: ‘Democracy is fundementally not German; it is Jewish. This Jewish democracy, with it’s majority decisions, had always been a means towards the destruction of any existing Aryan leadership’. Weimar democracy, being based on a betrayal, in which the ‘November criminals’ had stabbed the German army in the back. As such, it should be destroyed and replaced and replaced by a dictatorship, a one party state run on the basis of the Führerprinziprinzip (the principle of leadership)
XThe Führerprinzip was the basis on which the Nazi party had been run since 1925. Within the party, Hitler had supreme control over policy and strategy, and party members became subordinated to Hitler’s will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How was agressive nationalism a method of Nazi propaganda?

A

As a German nationalist, Hitler had 3 main aims:
-To reverse the humiliation of the treaty of Versailles- which he described as an instrument of ‘unlimited blackmail and shameful humiliation’- and restore to Germany those lands taken from it
-To establish a ‘greater German Reich’ in which all Germans would live within the borders of the state
-To secure for Germany it’s ‘Lebensraum’ to settle it’s people and provide it with the food and raw materials needed to sustain it as a great power, since ‘only an adequately large space on this earth assures a nation it’s freedom of existence’
This was an agressive form of nationalism. Hitler did not merely want to restore Germany to it’s border of 1914 but also expand the territory of the Reich. This would involve a war of conquest to secure Germany’s Lebensraum in the East, which was justified by Hitler’s racial theories and his belief in the necessity of struggle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How was anti semitism a method of Nazi propaganda?

A

-Hitler saw the Jews as responsible for all of Germany’s ills. Jews were represented in Nazi propaganda as greedy, cunning and motivated only by selfish motives
-They were described as ‘a parasite in the body of other nation’s’, having no state of their own and working through a worldwide Jewish conspiracy to establish their dominance over other races
-The Jews were held responsible for the evils of capitalism and, at the same time, for the growth of communism. Ok that basis, they were held responsible for Germany’s defeat in ww1, the hated TOV and Germany’s decline as a great power, together with the political weaknesses of democratic system in the Weimar Republic
-Above all, Hitler regarded communism as a Jewish creed that had undermined the political and social cohesion of Germany and should be eradicated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the importance of Hitler to Nazi success?

A

-By 1929, Hitler had established undisputed control over the Nazi party and a leadership cult had been created around him. His political skills and qualities were therefore of crucial importance to the party.
-For many, although certainly not all Germans, he possessed great charisma and unparalleled oratorical skills
-His speeches often went on for hours and contained a lot of repetition and outright lies, but he had a hypnotic effect
-He knew how to play on people’s emotions and fears, and to convince them he had the answers
-He was also an opportunist who could tailor his message to his audience.
-His mass appeal was therefore vital to the success of the Nazi’s in winning votes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was the role of anti semitism in Nazi electoral success?

A

-The Nazi’s used the Jews as scapegoats in their propaganda, portraying them as responsible for Germany’s economic and political problems. During the depression, many shopkeepers and small business owners were receptive to the idea that their problems were caused by ‘Jewish capitalism’
-People who had previously kept their anti Semitic views quiet were now willing to express them more freely
-However, although many ordinary Germans were still unwilling to go along with openlu anti Semitic propaganda, they were so pre occupied with immediate economic hardships that they heard the messages they wanted to hear
-Reaching a judgement about the political appeal of anti semitism is extremely difficult. Millions of people voted for the Nazi party who had never done so before. It is likely that only a small minority of these new voters had anti semitism as a main motive or were influenced by it in any way at all
-A statistical analysis of Nazi propaganda posters and campaign speeches in 1931-32 shows an overwhelming concentration on economic issues with very little emphasis on anti semitism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was the role of propaganda in Nazi electoral success?

A

-The Nazi’s were very skilled in propaganda techniques and this played an important part of their success in winning votes. Hitler understood the importance of propaganda and Joseph Goebbels, his Reich propaganda chief from 1928, as a master of the medium
-We have already seen how Hitler’s oratorical skills played a huge role in Nazi success; with the money provided by big business leaders such as Hugenberg and Thyssen, Hitler was able to travel by air and car to make speeches in all the main cities in Germany. The Nazi’s had their own newspaper’s
-They also published many posters and leaflets, put on film shows and staged rallies
-Nazi marches and rallies, with their banners, songs, bands and the sheer force of numbers, made a powerful statement about Nazi strength
-Nazi propaganda skilfully targeted different groups in the population and adapted the Nazi message to particular gather audiences. Nazi speakers were well trained in oratorical techniques and in the party’s ideology
-Anti Semitic slogans were used with some audiences but not with others, depending on how useful the Nazi’s judged them to be
-For the most part, the Nazi’s concentrated on their simple message that Weimar democracy was responsible for economic depression, national humiliation and internal divisions
-In it’s place, they offered a vague but powerful vision of a prosperous and United Germany, restored to it’s rightful position among the great powers of Europe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What were chancellor Brüning’s policies to manage the economic crisis?

A

Chancellor Brüning thought that the best way of combating the economic collapse was to adopt a policy of deflation (reducing the prices of goods and services to reduce government spending). He thought that if state revenue (income) declined, state expenditure had to also be cut. Brüning used an emergency decree to introduce wage cuts, rent cuts and tax rises. One of the few benefits of his policies was that, as Germany’s depression deepened, it was clear to other countries that it would not be able to meet reparations payments or repay loans. On July 1, 1931, the Hoover Moratium suspended the need for Germany to pay back loans for a year. To boost the economy, others had suggested a plan for job creation, as had happened in the US, or devaluing the Reichsmark to make German goods cheaper and to increase demand for these goods abroad. Instead, Brüning’s policies deepened the recession between 1930 and 1932. Industrial production fell, prices fell and exports fell, all by around 50%. Unemployment rose to its highest level ever in 1932.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What were Chancellor Von Papen’s policies to manage the economic crisis?

A

In May 1932, Brüning was replaced by von Papen who introduced some tax concessions (discounts) and subsidies (financial support) for businesses that created new jobs and helped to improve the economy. However, by then, the government was caught up in political problems which made it increasingly difficult to focus on the economy and produce a coherent policy to bring about economic stability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How did the Wall Street crash cause the German economy to spiral into an economic depression? (Timeline)

A

-To re-stabilise the German economy following the collapse of the currency and hyperinflation crisis, Stresemann settles the Dawes (1924)and Young (1929) Plans. The plans renegotiate reparations payments and result in Germany being loaned 25.5 billion marks to aid her recovery
-The American economy collapsed in October 1929 following the Wall Street crash
-America immediately stopped foreign lending, and recalled loans from abroad, including from Germany.
-The German economy was especially vulnerable since it was propped up by foreign capital, mostly loans from America, and was very dependent on foreign trade.
-German businesses which had relied on bank loans did not have enough money to sustain their production and pay their workers
-Unemployment increased, German people had less money to spend and the demand for consumer goods/products dropped
-Businesses sold fewer goods, which resulted in them laying off more workers. Suppliers and businesses struggled to pay off loans from banks, and went bankrupt
-With unemployment on the rise, many Germans could not to meet rent and mortgage payments, and lost their homes.
-With many businesses and individuals unable to pay back their bank loans, a number of German banks collapsed and people lose their money and savings
-The German economy spiralled into an economic depression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What was the Wall st crash, 24th October- Black Thursday?

A

Share prices on Wall St collapse
• Value of US companies fell by $10bn in one day
• Fortunes lost, companies went bankrupt, workers lost jobs, banks stopped lending, international trade collapsed, so
• Depression spread to other countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What was the impact of the wall st crash on German banking?

A

• Banks stop lending
• May 1931 collapse of an Austrian bank leads to collapse of German banking.
• July 1931 Government close banks and stock exchange for 2 days to prevent complete collapse, but respite temporary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What was the impact upon unemployment of the wall st crash?

A

• Crash Rising unemployment put enormous pressure on the otherwise generous welfare provision. Steps were taken in 1930 to reduce unemployment benefit which put more pressure on local authorities
• Registered unemployed: 1929 –1.5m, 1930 – 3m, 1931 – 4.2m, 1933 – 6m. Figures don’t include many women & redundant who had not registered. A better estimate of unemployed is 8m by 1933.
• Worse in industrial areas: Ruhr, Silesia, ports.
• White collar workers were hit by cuts in civil service: those
who didn’t lose their job faced wage cuts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What was the impact upon agriculture of the wall st crash?

A

• Already in the throes of a Depression before the Crash:
• Global grain surplus and price slump in 1925-26.
• 1928 German farmers involved in small-scale riots – dubbed the ‘farmers’ revenge’ – in protest against foreclosures and low market prices.
• Unemployment grew esp among farm workers.
• By 1929, agricultural production < 3⁄4 pre-war levels.

26
Q

What was the impact upon German industry of the wall st crash?

A

• By 1928, German economy stagnant, but reliant upon US for loans and markets.
• Recall of US loans came at worst possible moment.
• Demand for German goods collapsed, with the US imposing tariff barriers in 1930.
• 1929-32 export trade fell by 61% and industrial production by 58% of 1928 level (GB 11%).
• Companies went bankrupt and unemployment rose.
• Companies that survived cut wages and working hours

27
Q

What was the impact of the wall st crash on unemployment?

A

• The costs of welfare soon overwhelmed the budget.
• Welfare was delegated locally and means tested.
• Women received less than men, and young people less than adult.
• Areas which depended on one industry experienced unemployment on a larger scale.
• Mass poverty was on the rise, along with disease, such as ricketts which were caused by malnutrition.
• As unemployed people were evicted, tents and shanty towns started to appear.

28
Q

What was the impact of the wall st crash on Youth?

A

• Unemployment among young males reached 39%.
• Young men began to congregate in public as they had nothing to do.
• The number of 14-25 year olds accused of crime rose.
• Youths were charged with offenses against the state and threatening behaviour.
• The number of young men involved in extremist organisations increased. The Hitler Youth offered food, uniforms and shelter.
• Girls and women were barely every involved in these groups.
• Bruning introduced emergency labour schemes and voluntary schemes to occupy people. The main aim was to get people “off the streets”. In the long term the schemes accomplished little.

29
Q

What was the political impact of the wall st crash?

A

• Unemployment benefit, falling tax revenues and slowing global trade placed a strain on the Weimar Government’s finances.
• The DVP wanted to reduce unemployment benefit, while the SPD wanted to raise taxes, splitting the Coalition. In March 1930 Muller resigned.
• Bruning was appointed by Hindenburg - Bruning was the leader of the Centre Party. Two key army figures, Groener and Von Schleicher were instrumental in his appointment. These army men wanted a return to authoritarian government. Hindenburg hated democracy, and now Bruning also had authoritarian leanings.
• Bruning’s coalition excluded the SPD, which meant that no laws could get passed. Governments had to rely on presidential decree to get anything done.

30
Q

What happened in January 1933 with the appointment of Hitler?

A

-On 30th January 1933, Adolf Hitler was summoned to the office of the president of the Weimar Republic, Field Marshal Hindenburg. At this short but momentous meeting Hitler was invited by Hindenburg to lead a new ‘government of national concentration’, a coalition government in which the Nazi party would share power with the DNVP and others, including Frank Von Papen
-When he left the meeting to return to his party headquarters, Hitler had been appointed Chancellor of the new government
-Although Hitler was the leader of the largest party in the Reichstag, Hindenburg and Papen believed his inexperience meant that he could easily be manipulated by the more experienced politicians in his cabinet

31
Q

What was the process that brought Hitler to power?

A

-The process that brought Hitler to power in January 1933 was long and complex. Hitler and the Nazis won enough votes in the 1932 elections to become the largest party in the Reichstag, but that did not mean Hitler was carried into power on a wave of popular support
-The NSDAP was the largest party in the Reichstag, but it didn’t have an absolute majority, and a large majority of German voters supported other parties
-Nor did Hitler become chancellor as the result of a nazi led political uprising, even though subsequent Nazi propaganda presented it in that way
-His appointment involved negotiations and secret deals between many key German political figures, including Hindenburg and his close circle of advisers

32
Q

What happened with the fall of Bruning’s government?

A

-Bruning’s coalition government was in power from March 1930 until May 1932, despite not having majority support in the Reichstag. His appointment by Hindenburg had been heavily influenced by Schleicher and he could only remain in office, or indeed pass laws, with Hindenburg and Schleicher’s continued support
-Kurt Von Schleicher, who had become the key power broker in Weimar politics, was determined to establish a more authoritarian style of government in Germany and his first attempt to achieve this was during Bruning’s government, which ruled largely through presidential decree

33
Q

What did Bruning’s government do with economic policy?

A

-In economic policy, Bruning’s priority was to reduce state expenditure by cutting welfare benefits, reducing the number of civil servants and cutting wages, a policy for which he was dubbed the ‘Hunger chancellor’
-Far from improving the economic situation, these measures contributed to the deepening of the depression and, by February 1932, unemployment in Germany exceeded 6 million for the first time
-As unemployment increased, so too did electoral support for the Nazi party and the communist party, and the level of street violence rose
-By the spring of 1932, there was growing alarm among the middle and upper classes that Germany was descending into chaos and that a communist revolution was a real possibility

34
Q

What happened with Schleicher withdrawing support for Bruning’s government?

A

-Although Bruning imposed a ban on the SA in April 1932 in an attempt to stop street violence, the political situation continued to deteriorate and Schleicher withdrew his support
-Schleicher was concerned that the ban on the SA would provoke a Nazi uprising and he also came to the conclusion, after the presidential election, that no government could rule without the support of the Nazi party
-In talks with Schleicher, Hitler refused to join a coalition government unless he was appointed chancellor, something that Schleicher was not willing to concede

35
Q

What did Hitler agree after the fall of Bruning’s government in 1932?

A

-Hitler did not agree to oppose a new government, on condition that there would be a new Reichstag election and that the ban on the SA was lifted
-Bruning’s fate as chancellor was sealed. When Hindenburg, acting on Schleicher’s advice, refused to sign a presidential decree Bruning had submitted, Bruning had no alternative but to resign
-Hindenburg replaced him with Franz Von Papen, with Schleicher as defence minister in the new cabinet

36
Q

What was the ‘cabinet of barons’, May- December 1932?

A

-Following the orders of Hindenburg and Schleicher, Papen, in an attempt to establish a ‘government of national concentration’, constructed his government on a non party political basis
-The only political party that supported his coalition was the DNVP, which was rewarded with 2 posts in the cabinet
-All other cabinet positions were filled by men who were not members of the Reichstag, most of whom came from the landowning and industrial elite, hence the nickname ‘cabinet of barons’.
-With limited support in the Reichstag, Papen continued to rule by decree, a situation that suited his authoritarian leanings

37
Q

What did Papen believe was the greatest threat to Germany?

A

-Papen believed that the greatest threat to Germany was a communist revolution and that Weimar democracy had allowed this threat to grow. Although, as an aristocrat, he looked down on the Nazis, he nevertheless sympathised with many of Hitler’s ideas and saw the Nazis, with their mass popular supper as useful allies in his quest to establish a government of ‘national concentration’
-In June 1932, therefore, he lifted the ban on the SA and imposed curbs on the left wing press
-The result was a new wave of street violence, especially during the Reichstag election campaign of July 1932’ which gave Papen an excuse to impose authoritarian rule in Germany’s largest state, Prussia

38
Q

What happened in the July 1932 election?

A

-One of the terms of the agreement between Hitler and Schleicher was that there should be a new Reichstag election. This was held at the end of July. Most moderate parties, with the exception of the centre, suffered losses in this election as Germany’s political life had become even more polarised compared with the previous election in September 1930
-The DVP and the DDP, in particular, experienced a serious loss of support and were reduced to the ranks of fringe parties. The DNVp also suffered heavy losses as the Nazis succeeded in attracting large numbers of middle class voters, many of whom had never participated in elections before and many of the unemployed

39
Q

What position was Hitler in after the July 1932 election?

A

-Hitler was now in an even stronger position in his dealings with Papen and Schleicher. After the election, Papen invited Hitler to join his government but Hitler still refused. Again he would only participate in a coalition government if he was chancellor
-He also felt free to break his agreement with Schleicher and attack Papen’s government. Indeed, the Nazis joined with other parties, including even the communists to debate a vote of no confidence in Papen’s government, which was passed by the massive majority of 512 votes of 42
-Papen’s position had weakened and he was forced to ask Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag and call a new election in November

40
Q

What happened in the November 1932 election?

A

-The most striking aspect of the November 1932 election result was the loss of support for the Nazi party. Although they remained the largest party in the Reichstag, they lost 2 million votes and 34 seats in the Reichstag
-It appeared that Nazi support had peaked in July and was now in decline. Part of the explanation for this was that many middle class voters had been alienated by Hitler’s attacks on Papen and by his refusal to join a coalition government if he could not lead it
-These middle class voters retuned to the DVP and the DNVP, both of which saw a modest revival in their electoral support
-The fact that the Nazis had supported a communisy led transport strike in Berlin during the election campaign also damaged the party in the eyes of middle class voters, who weee terrified of a communist revolution
-Moreover, 3 election campaigns in the space of 8 months had exhausted Nazi funds
-Hitler appeared to have lost his chance to take power by legal means. The centre parties suffered losses, whilst the communists made significant gains

41
Q

What happened with the end of Papen’s government?

A

-Overall, the biggest loser in the Novemeber 1932 election was Papen, even though he was not a candidate. His government still faced a hostile Reichstag majority and he was beginning to loss credibility in the eyes of the army
-Papen considered banning the Nazis and the communists, and using the army to enforce an authoritarian style of government, which wojld bypass the Reichstag altogether
-However, when Schleicher informed Papen that the army would not support him, he has no alternative but to resign

42
Q

What was Hindenburg’s inner circle?

A

-Throughout the complicated twists and turns of the political situation in 1932, a small group of men who made up president Paul Von Hindenburg’s inner circle of advisers were involved in all of the key decisions
-It was this group which advised Hindenburg on the appointment of chancellors and the signing of presidential decrees
-Chief among these was Kurt Von Schleicher who, since 1926, had been the political head of the army
-Indeed, since 1929, he had been the head of the ministerial office whose function was to represent the army in its dealings with the government
-Schleicher had been instrumental in persuading Hindenburg to withdraw his support from Bruning in May 1932 and appoint Papen in his place. Then, in November 1932 Schleicher was deeply involved in the downfall of Papen, since Papen had proved to be far too independent minded for Schleicher’s liking

43
Q

What was Schleicher like in the role of backstairs intrigue?

A

-Schleicher was ambitious, quick whited and addicted to behind the scenes intrigue. As a conservative, he worked for the restoration of authoritarian rule in Germany, but, as a pragmatist, he recognised that this could not be achieved through a straightforward return to the past
-The rise of the Nazi party had transformed German politics
-Schleicher aimed for an alliance between the forces of old conservatism and the Nazis who, with their popular support, would legitimise an authoritarian regime dominated by the old conservatives

44
Q

Who else occupied key positions within hindeburg’s private office?

A

-Oskar Von Hindenburg, his son, was another army officer with close links to Schleicher. He controlled access to the president and his opinions were highly valued by his father
-Also in a key position was Dr Otto Meissner, a civil servant who ran the presidents office and acted as a key go between in negotiations between Hitler and Hindenburg
-Hindenburg regarded Hitler with disdain and viewed the Nazis as a noisy, undisciplined rabble.
-He was, therefore, reluctant to concede Hitler’s demand to be made chancellor without any checks on his freedom of action
-After the fall of Papen’s government, however, Hindenburg was running out of options

45
Q

What happened with Schleicher’s government, December 1932 to January 1933?

A

-After the fall of papen, Schleicher persuaded president Hindenburg to appoint him as chancellor. He was reluctant to take this step as he preferred to exercise influence from behind the scenes
-Moreover, his task of constructing a stable government was fraught with difficulty since he had alienated Papen and lost some of Hindenburg’s trust because of the way he had conspired against Papen
-He believed that his best chance of success lay in persuading the Nazis to join a coalition government led by him
-At first this did not seem to be an impossible dream. The Nazis had suffered a setback in the November election and, in state elections in December, their support continued to fall
-They were also virtually bankrupt. Criticism of Hitler’s tactics in refusing to join a coalition government after several invitations was beginning to surface within the Nazi party itself
-All of this contributed to the impression that Hitler had overplayed his hand and that his bargaining position had weakened
-Schleicher, believing that he could put pressure on Hitler by playing on these divisions in the party, opened negotiations with tye party’s organisation leader, Gregor Strasser, about joining his government
-Hitler, however, moved quickly to get rid of strasser and reassert his control over the party. Schleicher’s bid to win nazi support for his government had failed

46
Q

What did Schleicher do after he failed to win Nazi support?

A

-Schleicher changed tack. He believed that a progressive social policy could win support from the trade unions and, through them, gain support in the Reichstag
-With the economic situation at last beginning to improve, he cancelled the cuts in wages and benefits made by Papen in September, considered a large scale job creation scheme to relieve unemployment, and even talked about breaking up breaking up some of the large estates in the east and distributing the land to small farmers
-All of this was too much for the industrialists and landowners, who were the backbone of German conservative politics, and it also failed to attract trade union support
-Schleicher’s last throw of the dice was to ask Hindenburg to suspend the constitution, dissolve the Reichstag and give him virtually dictatorial powers, Hindenburg refused and Schleicher resigned

47
Q

What has been happening after/during Schleicher’s government?

A

-Meanwhile, Papen had been involved in negotiations with Hitler over forming a new coalition government. Although Hitler still insisted on being chancellor in any government he was part of, he was now prepared to consider a coalition
-Alfred Hugenberg, the DNVP leader, indicated that he was prepared to support a Nazi led coalition
-Talks between Hitler, Papen and Hindenburg’s inner circle led to a deal in which Hitler would form a coalition government with himself as chancellor
-Hindenburg’s doubts about this were laid to rest by reassurances from Papen and Oskar that Hitler would not have a free hand to govern the country as he wished
-Papen would be vice chancellor and Hugenberg world run the economics and food ministries.
-Apart from Hitler, there would be only 2 other Nazis in the cabinet. Both Papen and Hindenburg believed that Hitler, who was poorly educated and inexperienced in government, would be east to control

48
Q

What was the Hitler cabinet?

A

-On 30th Jan 1933, Hitler was appointed chancellor by president Hindenburg. Later that day, Hitler held his first cabinet meeting. It was a cabinet in which the Nazi party held only 3 posts out of a total of 12 ministers, reinforcing Papen’s view that no fundamental political change would occur by including the Nazis
-Franz Papen held the position of vice chancellor and was also the minister president of Prussia, Germany’s largest state
-He also had won the right to be present whenever Hitler met with president Hindenburg. The real decisions in cabinet would be taken by the non nazi majority, many of whom belonged, like Papen himself, to the old aristocratic elite
-Papen believed that Hitler would not be able to dominate his own cabinet; still less would be be able to become the dictator he aspired to be
-Hitler, on the other hand, was determined to establish a Nazi dictatorship as soon as possible.
-By the end of March 1933, he was well on the way to achieving this

49
Q

What happened in the evening of January 30th 1933?

A

-Hitler stood on the balcony of the reich chancellor to review a torchlight procession by around 100,000 nazi members winding its way through the streets of the capital Berlin
-Organised by Hitler’s propaganda chief, Joseph Goebells, this demonstration was designed to show that Hitler’s appointment as chancellor was not going to be a normal change of government, one of the many that had been seen in the 14 years since the German republic had been established
-It was a spectacular demonstration of Hitler’s personal triumph and of the victory of the nazi movement
-Hitler and his nazi party were making it clear that their accession to power would mark a historic break with the past and the start of their ‘national revolution’

50
Q

How did Hitler use the SA for violence against political opponents?

A

-The violence of the nazi stormtroopers (SA) had played a key role in Hitler’s rise to power. Once he was in power in Jan 1933, he used state resources to consolidate his position and rapidly expanded the SA, since the stormtroopers’ violence and terror were vital weapons in his struggle to eliminate opposition
-From a membership of around 500,000 in Jan 1933, the organisation grew to around 3 million strong a year later
-Another result of the Nazis being in power was that the activities of the SA gained legal authority. In late February 1933, the SA and the Stahlhelm were merged and became recognised as ‘auxiliary police’; orders were issued to the regular police force forbidding them from interfering with SA activities
-Frick and Goering occupied key positions in the cabinet- Frick as minister of the interior for the whole reich and Goering as minister of the interior in Prussia- which enabled the Nazis to control the police

51
Q

What was the nazi ‘legal revolution’ and ‘revolution from below’?

A

-The nazi ‘legal revolution’ and ‘revolution from below’, in which the SA unleashed a reign of terror against socialist and communist opponents, were opposite sides of the same coin
-Using their newfound powers, the SA unleashed a sustained assault on trade union and KPD offices, as well as on the homes of left wing politicians
-Gangs of stormtroopers broke up SPD and KPD meetings
-On 5th February, a young nazi shot dead the SPD mayor of a small town in Prussia and, later in the month, a communist was killed in clashes with the SA
-Not only were these crimes ignored by the police but, when the SPD newspaper condemned the killings, the paper was banned
-The centre party also became a target after its newspapers criticised the nazi regime. Centre party newspapers were banned and stormtroopers attacked the party’s meetings

52
Q

How did Nazis use concentration camps against political opponents?

A

-Thousands of communists, socialists and trade unionists were rounded up and imprisoned in makeshift concentration camps set up in old factories or army barracks
-The first permanent concentration camp was established on 8th March at Dachau near Munich, with accommodation for over 5000 people
-This became the model for later concentration camps. By july 1933, 26,789 political prisoners had been arrested by the SA, or taken into ‘protective custody’ to use the official Nazi terminology, and imprisoned in some 70 camps

53
Q

What was the Reichstag fire?

A

-On taking power, Hitler persuaded Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag and call a new election in March. He believed that the Nazis could win an outright majority in this election, thereby strengthening his position
-This election campaign was the occasion for an intensification of Nazi terror against their opponents. By the time the election took place on 5th March, the SPD and KPD had virtually been driven underground by the atmosphere of terror and intimidation generated by the Nazis
-A key moment in the campaign was the burning down of the Reichstag building on 27th February. A young Dutch communist, was arrested and charged with causing the fire
-There have been suspicions ever since that the Nazis deliberately set him up to set fire to the Reichstag in order to justify introducing repressive measures, but no definitive evidence has ever emerged to show exactly who was responsible
-Whoever that was, it was clear that the nazi regime gained the most from the fire,as they claimed that it was part of a communist plot to start a revolution in Germany and the event was used to justify the immediate suspension of civil liberties
-Terror had now become a legal means to crush opposition

54
Q

What was the decree for the protection of the people and the state?

A

-Hitler was appointed chancellor by Hindenburg in a way that was strictly legal, according to the the constitution of the Weimar Republic. That constitution technically remained in force during the rule of the third Reich but, in the aftermath of the Reichstag fire, Hitler was able to persuade Hindenburg to sign a decree giving him ‘emergency’ powers
-This was the decree for the protection of people and the state, which suspended important civil and political rights that had been guaranteed under the Weimar constitution
-Thus the police were given increased powers to arrest, without charge, those deemed to be a threat to state security
-The police also gained increased powers to enter and search private premises, while the government had the power to censor publications
-In practice, these powers were used to arrest communists and socialists, to ban their newspapers, and to disrupt their organisations
-The decree also gave the central government the power to take over state governments if they refused to act against the Nazis political opponents

55
Q

What was the decree for the protection of the people and the state primarily designed for?

A

-The decree was designed primarily to legalise a full scale assault on the communists. Backed by a propaganda campaign in which the Nazis claimed that germany was on the brink of a ‘German Bolshevik revolution’, the SA launched a ferocious campaign of violence against Germany
-The police arrested 10,000 communists in 2 weeks, including most of the leaders
-Although the KPD was not yet officially banned, and the party was still able to put up candidates in the March election, party membership was treated by the courts as an act of treason and many communists were given long sentences
-Civil servants, judges and the police, who were overwhelmingly conservative and nationalist in their political sympathies, were only too willing to give legal sanction to the Nazis’ campaign of terror

56
Q

What happened in the March 1933 election?

A

-The election campaign was conducted against this backdrop of terror and intimidation. The SA controlled the streets, many of the Nazis’ opponents were locked up, the offices of the SPD and KPD had been smashed up and their funds confiscated
-It was virtually impossible for the left to organise election meetings and their posters were removed as soon as they were put up. Anyone distributing leaflets for the SPD or KPD was liable to be arrested
-Meanwhile, the nazi propaganda machine flooded the country with posters, leaflets, radio broadcasts, election rallies and parades
-Even with the resources of the state at their disposal, and their opponents effectively banned from campaigning, the Nazis did not achieve the resounding success they desired in the election

57
Q

What happened to the Nazi vote in the March 1933 election?

A

-The nazi vote had increased since the previous election in November 1932, but not as much as Hitler hoped and expected. Despite the violence and intimidation, SPD and communist support had held up remarkably well, as did support for the centre
-Perhaps the most significant point about the election result was that 64% of voters had supported non nazi parties
-On the other hand, with the support of their dnvp allies, now had a Reichstag majority

58
Q

What was the aim of the first meeting of the new Reichstag in March 1933?

A

-The first meeting of the new Reichstag was held in the kroll opera house on 23rd March. Hitler’s sole objective at this meeting was to secure the necessary two thirds majority for his enabling act, law that would allow him to make laws without the approval of the Reichstag and without reference to the president, for a period of 4 years

59
Q

When was the enabling act passed?

A

-The enabling act was passed by the Reichstag on 24th March 1933. Further to this, Hitler was also given the power to make treaties with foreign states without the reichstag’s approval
-Because this law was a change in the constitution, it required a 2 thirds majority of the Reichstag in order to be legally enforceable. With the communist deputies unable to take their seats and the dnvp willing to collaborate with the Nazis in passing the bill, the centre party held the key to getting the necessary two thirds majority
-By offering the centre party the reassurance that he would not use his powers without first consulting Hindenburg. Hitler won its support
-Only the SPD deputies voted against the bill and the enabling act duly became law
-With full executive and legislative powers, Hitler could rule without needing a Reichstag majority and, after 1933, the Reichstag rarely met

60
Q

What was the enabling act to Hitler?

A

-The enabling act was the final piece in the legal framework that legitimised the Nazi dictatorship. Hitler was now able to issue decrees without needing Hindenburg’s approval
-Although the law was presented as a temporary measure for 4 years, in practice it was a permanent fixture of the Nazi regime
-With the new law in force, the nazis could now begin to construct the one party, terror state that Hitler wanted