1. Early Years Of The Weimar Republic Flashcards

1
Q

Who was Prince Max of Baden?

A

-Born:10th July 1867 in Baden-Baden
-Member of house of Baden, son of prince Wilhelm Mark
-Served as Germany’s last imperial chancellor prior to the creation of the Weimar Republic in November 1918
-He looked for peace on Germany’s behalf at the end of WW1
-Immediately transformed the government into a parliamentary system
-In turn, proclaiming the abdication of Emperoro Wilhelm II
-Both events took place on November 9th 1918

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who was Kaiser Wilhelm II?

A

-Born 27th January 1859
-Was the last German Emperor and King of Prussia
-Reigned from 15th June 1888 until his abdication on November 9th 1918
-He strengthened Germany’s Empire by building a powerful navy
-However his erratic foreign policy led to WW1
-When the German effort collapsed in 1918 he was forced to abdicate and therefore ended the German Empire and the House of Hakerzollerns 300 year reign in Prussia and 500 year reign in Brandenbug

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who was Friedrich Ebert?

A

-Born on 4th February 1871
-German politician of social Democratic Party
-First president of Germany from 1919 until death in 1925
-Became leader of SPD in 1913
-Pivotal figure in German revolution in 1918-19
-His main policies were to bring peace in Germany and suppress the left
-Signed treaty of Versailles
-Used his emergency powers 136 times during his reign

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does Republic mean?

A

A system of government in which head of state, or president, is elected into office

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an armistice?

A

An agreement to suspend fighting in order to allow a peace treaty to be negotiated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happened with the abdication of the Kaiser?

A

-At 1:30pm on 9th November 1918, in a house adjacent to the German army headquarters in Spa, Belgium, Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany was brought the news that his abdication had been announced in Berlin.
-He might well cry ‘treason’ but, by 5:00pm, he had been forced to accept what had happened.
-His companions advised him that his only hope of safety was to travel Northwards into Holland, which had remained neutral during the war which Germany had been waging on the Western Front
-His wife, the Empress Dona was still in Berlin and it was not until just before dawn on 10th November, that a convoy of 10 cars, including the kaiser’s, with it’s royal insignia removed, set off to the Dutch border at Eysen.
-Here, the royal party was kept waiting for six hours while the Dutch authorities decided what should happen to such an important visitor, but eventually they were allowed to continue by special train.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happened on 11th November 1918?

A

An armistice was agreed in Europe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why was the armistice agreed?

A

-By the end of September 1918 it had been clear to General Ludendorff and the German High command that Germany was on the brink of defeat.
-Although the allied armies had not yet entered German territory, German forces were in retreat along the Western front.
-Elsewhere in Europe, Germany’s allies were trying to negotiate peace terms. Ludendorff concluded that Germany’s only hope of avoiding a humiliating surrender was to ask the allies for an armistice.
-Us President Wilson’s fourteen points offered a possible basis for a negotiated peace settlement but Ludendorff understood that Germany’s autocratic political system was an obstacle to this. He, therefore, advocated a partial democratisation of the political system in Germany as a way of getting better peace terms from the allies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were President Wilson’s fourteen points?

A

Woodrow Wilson was an idealist and his fourteen points were devised as a means of dealing fairly with an aftermath of war. Some points, such as the return of Alsace-Lorraine to France, were quite specific and punitive towards Germany. However, there were also some General principles, such as the establishment of.a League of Nations to monitor future disputes and self determination, whereby different nations should rule themselves, together with General disarmament and Wilson’s determination to create a peace that would last and prevent another war.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the October Reforms?

A

In October, following the recommendations of Ludendorff, the Kaiser began a series of reforms that effectively ended his autocratic rule:
-He appointed Prince Max of Baden as new chancellor
-The chancellor was to be responsible to the Reichstag and he stabilised a new government based on the majority parties in the Reichstag, including the German social democratic (SPD)
-The armed forces were put under the control of government
These reforms were a major constitutional transformation in Germany but they did not come about as a result of popular pressure, nor because of pressure from the main democratic parties in the Reichstag. They amounted to a ‘revolution from above’ which was not only designed to save Germany from humiliation, but also to save the Kaiser’s rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does constitutional mean?

A

An established set of principles governing a state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the peace note?

A

On October 3rd, Prince Max wrote to president Wilson asking for an armistice. It took nearly 3 weeks for Wilson to reply, largely because he was suspicious that the German High command was using the request for an armistice as a means of buying time to regroup and prepare for a new offensive. When Wilson replied, he demanded that Germany must evacuate all occupied territory, call an end to submarine warfare and fully democratise it’s political system. These terms, which effectively demanded a German surrender and the Kaiser’s abdication, were too much for Ludendorff to accept. He tried but failed to gather support for a last ditch military effort to resist, whereupon he resigned and fled to Sweden. The reforms had failed to achieve his objectives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the impact of the peace note on the German people?

A

-The news that Prince Max’s government was asking for an armistice was a shattering blow to the morale of the German people and to their armed forces.
-The peace note was an admission that Germany had lost the war. This was the first occasion on which the German people had learned the truth about their country’s hopeless military situation.
-It undermined their respect for the Kaiser and his military and political leaders. Civilians who had borne the hardships of food shortages with fortitude were no longer prepared to show restraint
-Many soldiers and sailors lost respect for their officers.
-The Kaiser was increasingly seen as an obstacle to peace but he resolutely refused to abdicate. During a strike in Friedrichshafen on 22nd October, workers shouted ‘The Kaiser is a scoundrel’ and ‘Up with the German Republic’.
-On 28th October, when the German navy’s high command, in one last futile act of resistance to a humiliating peace, ordered ships from Wilhelmshaven to attack British ships in the English Channel, the crews of 2 cruisers refused to obey orders. This naval mutiny was the beginning of a much broader revolutionary movement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does mutiny mean?

A

A revolt by soldiers and sailors against their offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does Soviets mean?

A

The workers’ and soldiers’ councils established in the Russia revolution of 1917 (also known as the October revolution), when the Russian provisional Government was removed and the Bolsheviks, under the influence of Lenin, took control; the revolution was announced at the second congress of the Soviets, which were democratic bodies that existed in parallel to the provisional government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happened in the November revolution of 1918 before 9th November?

A

-Unrest in the navy spread to the main German naval base at Kiel. On 3rd November 1918, sailors there mutinied against their officers and took control of the base. On the following day the revolt spread to the city, and workers’ and soldiers’ council were established, similar to the Soviets in Russia during the revolution in 1917.
-By November 6th there were workers and soldiers councils springing up spontaneously all over Germany. Radical socialists did not lead these revolts, although it might seem to outsiders as though Germany was on the verge of a communist revolution like Russia’s. In fact, most members of the councils were patriotic Germans who wanted the Kaiser to abdicate and a democratic republic to be established
-Once the authority of military officers, government officials and police had been successfully challenged, the collapse of the regime happened with extraordinary speed.
-On November 8th a republic was proclaimed in Bavaria and the Bavarian monarchy was deposed. According to historian William Carr this was the ‘decisive moment in the German revolution’. It was certainly a key stage in the establishment of an all-German republic, as it brought home to Prince Max that he had lost control of the situation, but the most important developments were happening in Berlin.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What happened from November 9th onwards in the November revolution of 1918?

A

-On November 9th 1918, the SPD called on workers in Berlin to join a general strike to force the Kaiser to abdicate. They also threatened to withdraw support from Prince Max’s government unless the Kaiser abdicated within 24 hours. Max knew he couldn’t continue to govern without the SPD, so when the Kaiser still refused, Max took matters into his own hands and, on 9th November he released a press statement claiming the Emperor had abdicated.
-This was a desperate move from Prince Max to keep some control over the situation, even though he had no constitutional authority to act in this way.
-On the same day, Prince Max resigned as Chancellor and handed the position to Friedrich Ebert, the leader of the SPD.
-At about the same time Philip Scheidemann, another leading figure in the SPD, stood on the Reichstag balcony and declared that the German Republic was now in existence.
-All of these events happened before the Kaiser had, in fact, abdicated. Later in the day, General Groener told the Kaiser that the army would no longer fight for him. At this point the Kaiser had lost control of the situation and had no choice but to abdicate, although he did not actually sign his abdication until after it had been announced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was the key chronology between September and November 1918?

A

29th September- Ludendorff called for armistice negotiations
30th September- Kaiser promised political reform
1st October- Prince Max of Baden formed new government
3rd October- Prince Max’s letter to president Wilson asking for an armistice
24th October- Wilson replied to Prince Max’s request
26th October- Ludendorff resigned and fled to Sweden
28th October- Kaiser introduced further reforms making the chancellor accountable to the Reichstag
30th October- Naval mutiny at Wilhelmshaven
3rd November- Naval mutiny spread to Kiel
8th November- Revolt in Bavaria led to declaration of Bavarian socialist republic
9th November- Declaration of a German Republic in Berlin and abdication of the Kaiser
10th November- Ebert-Groener pact
11th November- Armistice signed with allies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What was the struggle for power in 1918?

A

-Ebert was not a revolutionary. He believed in evolutionary change through winning a majority in parliamentary elections and then introducing reforms. But, even though he had been chosen by Prince Max as the new chancellor because he was leader of the majority party in the Reichstag, he had come to power through a revolutionary act.
-He was conscious of the fact that his government lacked legitimacy. He was, therefore, determined to establish a new constitution as quickly as possible. His priority, after agreeing the armistice with the allies on 11th November, was to organise elections for a constituent assembly.
-Prior to the creation of a new constitution, Ebert urged Germans to keep essential services running, to avoid street demonstrations and to maintain law and order. His problem was that his authority did not extend much beyond Berlin where disorder and violence were becoming the norm?
-After the armistice and the demobilisation of much in the army, bands of angry, disillusioned and workless ex-soldiers roamed the streets. Street demonstrations, strikes and armed clashes became regular occurrences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What were the socialist groups and parties in 1918?

A

Spartacist league (later KPD), USPD, The social Democratic Party (SPD)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When was the spartacist league founded?

A

1916, by a more revolutionary minority group from the SPD. The name was changed to German communist party (KPD) in January 1919

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Who were the leaders of the KPD?

A

Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What were the aims of the KPD?

A

They wanted Republican government controlled by workers and soldiers’ councils, welfare benefits, nationalism, workers’ control of major industries, disbanding of the army and creation of local workers’ militias. Opposed to First World War.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Who supported the KPD?

A

A throng of workers would often join them on their rallies and demonstrations in the streets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

How many members did the KPD have?

A

5,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

When was the USPD founded?

A

1917, by a breakaway minority group from the left of the SPD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Who was the leader of the USPD?

A

Hugo Hasse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What were the aims of the USPD?

A

Wanted a republic with national Reichstag working with workers’ and soldiers’ councils, welfare improvements, nationalisation of industry, breaking up of large estates, reform of the army and creation of a national militia. Opposed to First World War.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Who supported the USPD?

A

Grew in strength during 1918 as war-weariness grew

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

How many members did the USPD have?

A

300,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

When was the SPD founded?

A

1875, as a Marxist socialist party committed to revolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Who were the leaders of the SPD?

A

Friedrich Ebert and Philip Scheidemann

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What were the aims of the SPD?

A

Wanted moderate socialist republic with democratic elections and basic personal freedoms, welfare improvements and gradual nationalism of industry. Wanted continuity and order supported Germany’s entry into First World War

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Who supported the SPD?

A

Appealed largely to working-class voters and, in 1912, became the largest party in the Reichstag

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

How many members did the SPD have?

A

1 million

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What does aristocracy mean?

A

The highest class in certain societies, typically compromising people of Noble birth holding hereditary titles and offices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What was the pressure from the left in 1918?

A

-Ebert’s efforts to contain the revolution were further threatened by pressure for more radical change from the left. He could not ignore the fact that the workers’ and solider’s councils, in which the USPD and the Spartacists had established a foothold, had made the running in the early stages of the revolution.
-They were not about to allow Ebert’s government to take the key decisions without any reference to them. On 22nd November an agreement was reached between the new government and the Berlin workers’ and soldiers’ councils whereby the government accepted that it only exercised power in the USPD, whose leaders were part of Ebert’s government, saw the councils as the true expression of revolutionary will of the people and the means by which the revolution could be extended.
-They believed that the autocratic system of government would not finally be abolished unless the aristocratic estates were broken up, the army, civil service and judiciary were democratised, and the key industries were nationalised under workers’ control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What was the pressure from the army in 1918?

A

-The survival of Ebert’s government depended on the support of the army. Most army officers came from aristocratic backgrounds, had been loyal to the Kaiser and were vigorously opposed to democracy. They had no wish to see Germany become a republic.
-In late 1918, however, the political situation in Germany was highly unstable and many officers believed that Germany faced the danger of a Bolshevik revolution, which would lead to civil war and possible occupation by allied forces.
-Their first concern was therefore to prevent the revolution from going any further.
-On 10th November, general groener telephoned Ebert to assure him that the army leadership would support the government. In return, Groener demanded that Ebert should resist the demands of the soldiers’ councils to democratise the army and defend Germany against communist revolution.
-Ebert assured Groener that the government was determined to resist further revolution and to uphold the existing command structure in the army. This agreement became known as the Ebert Groener pact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What did the Ebert Groener pact mean for Germany?

A

-For Ebert the pact was a necessary and unavoidable device to ensure an orderly transition to the New Republic.
-For his critics on the left, however, it was an abject betrayal of the revolution.
-Whilst Ebert and his cabinet made preparations for elections to a constituent assembly, to be held in January 1919, the struggle for power continued.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

How did the struggle for power continue after the Ebert Groener pact in December 1918-January 1919?

A

-On 6th December a spartacist demonstration in Berlin was fired on by soldiers, killing 16
-On 23-24 December a sailors’ revolt against the government in Berlin was put down by the army. In protest, the three USPD ministers in the government resigned
-On 6 January, the spartacists launched an armed revolt against the government in what became known as the January revolution, or the spartacist uprising. After a week of heavy fighting in Berlin, the revolt was crushed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Who was Philipp Scheidemann?

A

He was a popular, long standing member of the SPD, having first joined in 1883. He became a Reichstag deputy in 1903. Although he supported Germany’s entry to war, he was in favour of a negotiated peace. On 9th November 1918, it was Scheidemann who announced the birth of the New republic even before the Kaiser had officially abdicated. He was chancellor of the first coalition government in the New republic from February to June 1919, when he resigned in protest against the harsh terms of the Versailles treaty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What happened in the elections for the constituent assembly on 19 January 1919?

A

-Women were allowed to vote for the first time.
-The SPD secured the largest share of the vote and the largest number of seats in the assembly but they did not have an overall majority and would, therefore, have to compromise with other parties in order to establish a new constitution and govern the country.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Where did the assembly in 1919 meet? And why?

A

The assembly met in the small town of Weimar rather than Berlin, as the political situation in the capital was still unstable in the aftermath of the January revolution. This was how the new political order came to receive it’s name- the Weimar Republic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What happened after the Weimar Republic was created?

A

-Ebert was elected by the assembly as the first president of the Republic and a new government, led by Philipp Scheidemann, was formed by the SPD in coalition with the centre and German Democratic parties.
-The workers’ and soldiers’ councils handed over their powers to the constituent assembly, which could then concentrate on the business of drawing up a new constitution.
-Representatives agreed it should represent a break in the autocratic constitution written up by Bismarck in 1871.
-It, therefore, began with the clear declaration that ‘political authority derived from the people’, and the constitution was designed to enshrine and guarantee the rights and powers of the people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What were the main non-socialist political parties in the new republic?

A

-Centre party
-German Democratic Party (DDP)
-German national people’s party (DNVP)
-German people’s party (DVP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What was the centre party?

A

-Formed in 1870 to protect catholic interests in the mainly protestant German Reich
-Had strong support in the main Catholic areas of Bavaria and the Rhineland
-Supported a Democratic constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

What was the German Democratic Party?

A

-A left leaning liberal party, based on the old progressive party
-Most support came from intellectuals and middle class
-Supported a Democratic constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

What was the German National people’s party?

A

-A nationalist party,based on the old Conservative party
-Most support came from landowners and some small business owners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What was the German people’s party?

A

-A right leaning liberal party, based on the old national liberal party
-Most support came from upper-middle class and business interests
-Opposed to new republic but willing to participate in it’s governments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

Strengths of the Weimar Constitution in 1919?

A

-It provided a wider right to vote than in countries such as Great Britain and France. Women were able to vote on the same terms as men and they were allowed to become deputies in the Reichstag and state parliaments.
-The system of proportional representation enabled even the smaller parties to win seats in the Reichstag and influence government decisions. The country was divided into 35 electoral districts, each with about 1 million voters.
-There was full democracy in local government as well as central government. Unlike in the second Empire, the largest state, Prussia, was not in a position to dominate the rest of Germany.
-The constitution also set out clearly the rights of the individual. The ‘Fundamental rights and duties of German citizens were guaranteed in the second part of the constitution. Statements included: ‘all Germans are equal before the law’; ‘personal liberty in inviolable’: ‘censorship is forbidden’; ‘the right of property is guaranteed’; and ‘all inhabitants enjoy full religous freedom’. It gave illegitimate children the same rights as legitimate ones and promised ‘economic freedom for the individual’.
-Referendums could be called for by the president, the Reichsrat, or by people’s request if a tenth of the electorate applied for one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What was a key weaknessof the Weimar constitution in 1919?

A

-Proportional representation

52
Q

Why was proportional representation a weakness of the Weimar constitution?

A

It was designed to ensure that all shades of political opinion were represented in the Reichstag, since parties were allocated seats in proportion to the percentage of votes that they received in an election. This was a very clear system but it had 2 clear consequences.

53
Q

What were the 2 clear consequences of proportional representation?

A

-The proliferation of small parties
-Coalition governments

54
Q

How was proliferation of small parties a consequence of proportional representation?

A

Smaller parties could gain representation in the Reichstag-something that does not usually happen in a system of elections based on the first past the post principle. This enabled smaller parties-many of which were anti republican- to exploit the parliamentary system to gain publicity. Proportional representation did not, in itself, create the fragmented party system. This was due to the deep divisions in German society and the lack of national consensus.

55
Q

How were coalition governments a consequence of proportional representation?

A

Because of the proliferation of small parties, none of the larger parties could gain an overall majority in the Reichstag, all governments in the Weimar Republic were coalitions, many of which were very short lived.

56
Q

What is an autocracy?

A

A system of government in which power is concentrated in the hands of one person

57
Q

Who was Hans von Seeckt?

A

-He was a career soldier who had been put in charge of the German forces in East Prussia at the end of the war.
-He was a member of the German delegation to Versailles and was appointed head of the truppernamt (‘troop office’), which replaced the forbidden army general staff
-He became commander of the Reichswehr (army) from 1920. He was instrumental in disbanding the Freikorps units.
-Under his command from 1920 to 1926, the army became a privileged elite beyond accountability

58
Q

What was rule by presidential decree?

A

-Article 48 of the constitution gave the president the power to rule by decree in exceptional circumstances. The granting of such powers was not remarkable in itself- indeed, all democratic constituons allow for an executive authority to use exceptional powers in a time of national emergency.
-Ebert, the first president, used article 48 powers on 136 occasions. Some of these could be deemed to be genuine exceptional circumstances but Ebert also used his powers in non-emergency situations where he simply wanted to override opposition in the Reichstag.
-There were no effective safeguards since a president could threaten to dissolve the Reichstag and call new elections if it refused to agree to a presidential decree

59
Q

How did the undemocratic constitutions survive in the constitution?

A

-In the second Empire, the army, the civil service and the judiciary were key pillars of the regime. Army officers, senior civil servants and judges were recruited from the aristocracy, supported the autocracy and looked with disdain on democratic politicians
-They would not, therefore, fit easily into the New Democratic republic. An opportunity existed for the architects of the new constitution to reform these institutions but, because they placed the need for stability above the desire for a thoroughly democratic system of government , they did not do so

60
Q

How did the army survive in the Weimar constitution?

A

-It had been largely free from political control in the second Empire and it’s leaders were determined to preserve as much independence as they could in the Weimar Republic
-The officer corps of the army in the second empire was allowed to continue intact into the new republic with the result that the army was far from being politically neutral.
-The full force of military power would be used against left-wing revolts whilst conspirators from the right were often supported by elements within the army.
-General Hans Von Seeckt, who was appointed commander in chief of the army in 1920, believed that the army owed loyalty not to the Republic, which he regarded as merely temporary, but to a timeless Reich that was the true expression of German nationhood.
-Although he would not allow his officers to meddle in politics on their own initiative, he nevertheless believed that the army as a whole, and under his command, could intervene in politics whenever he saw fit

61
Q

How did the civil service survive in the Weimar constitution?

A

-Under the Weimar constitution, civil servants were given a guarantee of their ‘well earned rights’ and of their freedom of political opinion and expression as long as this didn’t conflict with their duty loyalty to the state.
-This meant that government administration in the new republic was left in the hands of those who were anti-democratic in their outlook.
-Senior civil servants, especially in the German foreign office, were still recruited overwhelmingly from the aristocracy.
-Top civil servants could wield enormous power, especially when ministers in coalition governments were frequently changing.

62
Q

How did the judiciary survive in the Weimar constitution?

A

-Article 102 of the constitution guaranteed the independence of the judges. This would be a basic requirement in any democratic constitution but in Weimar Germany the judges who had served the second empire remained in their posts
-These men were staunchly monarchist and anti-democratic and showed their bias in their legal judgements.
-The penal code of the republic stipulated that anyone attempting to overthrow the constitution by force should be sentenced to life imprisonment.
-Members of left-wing groups who were brought before the courts were punished with great severity.
-Right-wing conspirators, on the other hand, were treated very leniently.

63
Q

What does ‘Diktat’ mean?

A

An order or decree imposed by someone in power without popular consent

64
Q

What was the key chronology leading up to the signing of the treaty of Versailles?

A

11th November 1918- Armistice agreement to end the fighting on Western front
18th January 1919- Peace conference convened at palace of Versailles
7th May 1919- German delegates given document containing first draft terms of the treaty
16th June- Germans given 7 days to sign the treaty
20th June- Coalition cabinet collapsed because of divisions over signing treaty
22nd June- Reichstag voted to accept the treaty
28th June- German delegates signed the treaty of versailles

65
Q

What happened with between the allies and Germany after the war?

A

-The war had ended with the armistice agreement on 11th November 1918. Although Germany was on the brink of defeat, the armistice was not a surrender. It was an agreement to stop fighting and withdraw German forces from occupied territory, pending a full peace settlement.
-A conference to settle the peace terms between the allied powers and Germany met at the palace of Versailles, outside Paris, in January 1919.
-The Germans were not invited to attend or allowed to see the terms until May 7th
-The German government suggested changes to the treaty but the allies agreed to very few and, on 16th June, gave the German government 7 days to accept the treaty.

66
Q

What did the proposed treaty to the Germans cause?

A

-It provoked a political crisis in Berlin and led to the formation of a new coalition government.
-Finally, on 28th June 1919, the Versailles treaty was signed by all powers,
-It imposed much harsher conditions on Germany than most Germans had expected or were prepared to accept.
-Moreover, because Germany had not been allowed to participate in the conference or to negotiate over the terms, the treaty was regarded by Germans of all political viewpoints as a Diktat.
-Hatred of the treaty, and of the politicians who had signed it, would continue to cause political divisions throughout the life of Weimar Republic

67
Q

What were the terms of the treaty of Versailles?

A

-Territorial losses
-Disarmament of Germany
-War guilt
-The Rhineland
-The Saarland
-Other

68
Q

What was agreed about territorial losses at the treaty of Versailles?

A

-The treaty removed over 70,000km^2 (13%) of German territory and all Germany’s overseas colonies.
-Alsace-Lorraine was returned to France; Eupen and Malmedy were given to Belgium; Northern Schleswig-Holstein was given to Denmark; most of Posen, West Prussia and part of Pomerania were given to Poland; Danzig, a city with a majority German population, became a free state under League of nation protection; Memel was taken by Lithuania; Eastern Silesia was given to Poland, although Western Silesia voted to remain part of Germany
-This all meant that Germany lost 75% of it’s iron ore, 68% of it’s zinc ore, 26% of it’s coal and 15% of it’s arable land
-All of Germany’s overseas colonies in Africa and the Far East were placed under league of nation’s control (in practice, divided by the allies)

69
Q

What was agreed about the disarmament of Germany in the TOV?

A

-Germany had to surrender all heavy weapons and dismantle fortifications in the Rhineland and on the island of Heligoland. Conscription to the German armed forces was forbidden and the German army was limited to 15,000 men
-The navy was allowed a maximum of 6 battleships but no submarines and a small number of coastal defence vessels. Germany was forbidden from having an air force

70
Q

What was agreed about war guilt in the TOV?

A

-Under article 231 of the treaty, Germany had to accept responsibility for starting the war. This ‘war guilt clause’ made Germany liable to pay reparations to the allies to cover the costs of damage suffered in the war.
-The final amount of reparations was fixed by a commission in 1921 at £6.6 billion;Germany also had to hand over to the allies most of its merchant shipping fleet, railway locomotives and rolling stock, patents and overseas investments

71
Q

What was agreed about the Rhineland in the TOV?

A

-The left bank of the Rhine (western side) and a 50km strip on the right bank (eastern side) was permanently demilitarised.
-An allied army of occupation was based in the Rhineland to ensure Germany fulfilled it’s treaty obligations

72
Q

What was agreed about the Saarland in the TOV?

A

-This area of South-Western Germany, which contained rich reserves of coal, was separated from Germany and placed under League of nation’s control for 15 years, so Germany would supply France, Belgium and Italy with free coal as part of the reparations agreement. France was allowed to exploit coal mines in the area

73
Q

What were other agreements in the TOV?

A

-Austria was forbidden from uniting with Germany; Germany was not allowed to join the new League of Nations; the Kaiser and other Germans were to be put on trial for war crimes

74
Q

What is national self determination?

A

Nations being able to decide whether they govern themselves, independent of larger empires or groupings of nations

75
Q

What were the German reactions to the treaty of Versailles?

A

-The terms of the treaty, and the decision by the government to sign it, was greeted with horror and disbelief by the majority of Germans
-Until 1914, Germany had been one of the greatest military powers in Europe. For much of the war, and especially in the early months of 1918, victory in the war seemed to be only a matter of time. This, at least was the way Germany’s war effort was portrayed in official propaganda, even after the allies began to force the German army to retreat, after halting it’s advance in France in the spring of 1918.
-Neither ordinary soldiers nor the civilian population were told how desperate Germany’s military situation on the Western front had become by the autumn of 1918.
-Despite the hardship caused by the allied blockade, support for the war effort was still very strong
-The abdication of the Kaiser and subsequent signing of the armistice, therefore, came as a profound shock to millions of Germans
-When followed by the signing of a humiliating and ‘dictated’ peace treaty, there was almost universal resentment at the harsh terms and few Germans would accept moral responsibility for fulfilling the terms of the treaty

76
Q

Where did German objections to the TOV lie?

A

-Wilson’s fourteen points
-The ‘war guilt clause’
-Reparations
-Allied occupation
-Disarming of Germany

77
Q

Why did Germans object to Wilson’s 14 points?

A

-Whilst it stressed the importance of the right of national self-determination as a basis for a just peace, this right was denied to the Germans themselves.
-Millions of people who spoke German and considered themselves to be German were now living in Non-German states such as Czechoslovakia and Poland.
-The separation of East Prussia from the rest of Germany by the so-called Polish corridor was a major source of resentment

78
Q

Why did Germans object to the ‘war guilt clause’?

A

-It was seen as an unjust national humiliation since Germans believed that they had been forced into a just war against the allies, who had attempted to encircle Germany

79
Q

Why did Germans object to reparations in the tov?

A

They were a major cause of anger, partly because Germans felt that the level was too high and would cripple the German economy, and they did not accept the ‘war guilt clause’, which justified the reparations

80
Q

Why did Germans object to allied occupation in the tov?

A

It led to continuing friction. German nationalists were outraged by the outlawing of nationalist groups and banning of German patriotic songs and festivals in areas under French control

81
Q

Why did Germans object to the disarming of Germany in the tov?

A

The disarming of Germany and it’s exclusion from the league of nation’s were seen as unjust discrimination against a once proud and once-powerful nation

82
Q

How justified were German complaints about the treaty of Versailles?

A

It is possible to sympathise with the German reaction, but in some ways it was based on unrealistic expectations:
-Wilson’s 14 points and the armistice agreement had made it clear that Alsace-Lorraine would have to be returned to France, that a new state of Poland with access to the sea would be created, that Germany would be expected to hand over some of her assets and that considerable German disarmament would be expected.
-The treaty was not as severe as it might have been. Had Clemenceau had his way, he would have extended the French border to the Rhine, or annexed the Saar Coalfields and created an independent Rhineland. The French wanted to ensure that Germany could not threaten them again, but the other Allies resisted this as they wanted Germany to remain strong enough to withstand the spread of communism from Russia.
-The treaty did not punish Germany as severely as the Germans had punished Russia in the treaty of Brest-Litovsk in March 1918. Then, Germany had broken up the Western part of the Russian Empire and annexed large swathes of territory. In the Reichstag debate on that treaty, only the USPD had voted against this action
-Germany’s war aims of 1914 had included the annexation of territory from it’s enemies, the expansion of Germany’s colonial empire and a very severe reparations bill to be paid by the defeated allies. In other words, if Germany had won the war, the peace settlement would have been very harsh on the defeated allies
-The reparations bill was much lower than demanded by the French although reparations were a continuing source of friction between Germany and the allies during the life of the Weimar Republic, it was not behind Germany’s capacity to pay

83
Q

How was the political crisis of June 1919 a political impact of the Versailles treaty in Germany?

A

-When the harsh terms of the treaty were revealed to the German government in May 1919, ministers from all parties shared Chancellor Scheidemann’s view that accepting it would be incompatible with German honour. At this stage, however, it seemed possible to negotiate some amendments to the treaty.
-In the event, the rejection of German requests for extensive changes and the demand for acceptance of the treaty within Seven days caused a political crisis in Germany. Scheidemann and some of his ministers wanted to reject the treaty, whereas the majority of the cabinet and of the SPD members of the Reichstag believed that Germany had no other choice but to sign the treaty.
-Scheidemann resigned and a new coalition cabinet, led by Gustav Bauer, was formed.
-Meanwhile, some high-ranking officers in the German army, with the tacit support of Field Marshal Paul Avon Hindenburg, were discussing the possibility of resisting the signing of the treaty through renewed military action.
-President Ebert told General Groener that he would support rejection of the treaty if there was any chance that military action could be successful.
-Groener was a realist. He informed Ebert that military resistance would be futile and Germany had no alternative but to accept the treaty. The Bauer cabinet bowed to the inevitable and signed the treaty

84
Q

What was the reaction of pro-republican parties to the TOV?

A

-The divisions over the signing of the Versailles treaty continued to dominate German political life throughout the years of the Weimar Republic.
-The SPD and it’s allies in government in 1919 were well aware that signing it would rebound upon them. Indeed, they were well so concerned that they asked their main opponents in the DNVP, DVP and DDP to state that those who had voted for the treaty were not being unpatriotic. They also took the view that the most sensible course of action in the coming years was to outwardly comply with the terms of the treaty whilst negotiating modifications to it. This became known as the policy of fulfilment
-Even more importantly, however, the treaty turned some against the Weimar Republic. It’s real damage was in alienating moderates who had been happy to accept the new constitution and its promises of a ‘better’ Germany, but who couldn’t stomach politicians who appeared to have betrayed an unbeaten country
-The treaty caused political demoralisation at the very centre of the government, associating the Republic once again with weakness and failure.
-The politicians who agreed to it were forced to become defensive. To the public at large, the gains of the revolution seemed unimpressive

85
Q

What was the reaction on the right to the tov?

A

-Right wing resentment of the Republic was intensified by the signing of the Versailles treaty. German nationalists could not accept the fact of Germany’s military defeat, nor the establishment of the new republic
-The signing of the peace settlement was the final straw and led many to join groups committed to overthrowing the Republic.
-In the eyes of extreme nationalists, the politicians who now governed Germany lacked any legitimacy because they had betrayed the ‘Fatherland’ several times- in the dethroning of the Kaiser, the signing of the armistice and the acceptance of the Versailles treaty
-These politicians were labelled as the ‘November criminals’ and their actions of ‘betrayal’ were referred to as ‘the stab in the back’.
-The German army bore no responsibility for the defeat of 1918
-The fact that Ludendorff had advised the Kaiser in late September 1918 that the army was on the verge of defeat was conveniently forgotten. Indeed, Ludendorff had advised the Kaiser to appoint a new civilian led government in the hope that better peace terms would be secured and that the high command would avoid responsibility for the defeat and signing of the armistice.
-It was Ludendorff, and his superior Avon Hindenburg, who actively promoted the ‘stab in the back’ myth. This myth was the justification for continued nationalist attacks on the Republic, it’s political supporters and on the treaty.
-It was particularly appealing to ex-soldiers who had suffered in fighting for what they regarded as a noble cause and had then experienced insults and humiliation when they returned to a Germany in the throes of revolution

86
Q

What was the reactions in Britain to the tov?

A

-When prime minister Lloyd George returned to London after the signing of the treaty, he was given a rapturous reception from a large crowd.
-On the whole, British public opinion was satisfied that Germany had lost it’s overseas empire, along with it’s large fleet, and would be unable to threaten European peace for a generation
-Privately, however, Lloyd George believed that Germany should not be so weak that it would be unable to resist the expansion, of the USSR westwards, and he wanted Germany to become a strong trading partner with Britain again
-Many in Britain saw the French as being greedy and vindicative and there was a growing feeling in Britain that Germany had been unfairly treated at Versailles.
-One influential view was put forward by the economist, John Maynard Keynes, who argued that the level of reparations was too high
-He believed that the level of reparations ‘was one of the most serious acts of political un wisdom for which our statesmen have ever been responsible’

87
Q

What was the reaction from France to the tov?

A

-The French felt they had suffered the most out of all the combatant nations and they were determined to seek revenge at Versailles.
-The recovery of Alsace-Lorraine, the demilitarisation of the Rhineland and the payment of reparations were key French demands which had been met.
-Despite this, there were many in France who regarded the treaty as being too lenient on Germany, and Prime minister Clemenceau, who was blamed for making too many concessions, was defeated at the next election in 1920.
-Marshal Foch, the wartime military commander, expressed a widely held view in France when he said, ‘this is not peace. It is an armistice for twenty years’

88
Q

What was the reaction in the United States to the tov?

A

-Reactions to the treaty in America were generally negative. There was a widespread opinion that the treaty had been unfair on Germany and that Britain and France had used the treaty to enrich themselves at Germany’s expense
-The republicans in the American congress opposed the treaty and Wilson failed to win the congressional vote to ratify the treaty, leaving the USA to make a separate peace with Germany in 1921
-The USA refused to join the League of Nations and, in the 1920’s, retreated from involvement in European affairs

89
Q

What problems did reparations cause?

A

• Reparations made repayment of the huge government debt from the war even more difficult
• Germany’s gold reserves were inadequate for the scale of reparations that had to be made in gold.
•Germany had lost a large part of its coal reserves due to territory loss - and yet a percentage of the reparations had to be paid in coal
• Manufactured goods were an option for payment but the allies refused to accept them because it could potentially hurt their businesses
• The allies confiscated Germany’s export fleet, and imposed tariffs on German goods.

90
Q

What were the causes of hyperinflation?

A

-Economic impact of war (1914-18)
-TOG (June 1919)
-Weimar government response
-The French invasion of the Ruhr (Jan. 1923)
-Weimar government response

91
Q

How was economic impact of the war a cause of hyperinflation?

A

Germany financed much of the cost of WWI by printing more money. This led the currency to decline in value (inflation)
After the war, Weimar government spending remained high as they had to support war widows, injured veterans and demobilised soldiers. By 1924, about 10% of the Germany population were receiving federal welfare payments. More were on regional poor relief.
The new Weimar Constitution made social security a constitutional right so the government had to support the unemployed.

92
Q

How was the TOV a cause of hyperinflation?

A

The Treaty of Versailles committed Germany to pay £6,600 in reparations, starting in 1921.
Reparations had to be paid for in gold which held its value against the declining Germany currency (mark).
As the value of the mark became weaker, paying for reparations became ever more expensive.

93
Q

How was the Weimar government response to the Tov a cause of hyperinflation?

A

The German government tried to pay the reparations by borrowing and printing more money. This made inflation even worse and the value of the mark declined further.
In 1922, the German government sought to pause their reparation payments but were refused permission.
By early 1923, the German government failed to pay its reparations.

94
Q

How was the French invasion of the Ruhr a cause of hyperinflation?

A

French and Belgian governments responded to German failure to pay reparations by ordering an invasion of the Ruhr, a key German industrial region.
Their armies seized raw materials and goods to the value of the reparations.

95
Q

How was the Weimar government response to the French invasion of the Ruhr a cause of hyperinflation?

A

The German government stopped all reparation payments to France and ordered all German workers and business owners to follow a policy of passive resistance (e.g. working slowly, strikes, sabotage).
The Weimar government paid the wages of workers who went on strike and compensated owners for lost revenue.
They also had to import necessary stocks of fuel which added to their debt.
To meet spending obligations, the government printed more and more money.

96
Q

What was the hyperinflation crisis?

A

The problem of inflation in Germany ran out of control after the Ruhr crisis as confidence in the German currency collapsed: the mark now became worthless.
By autumn 1923, it cost more to print a bank note than the note was worse. Germany had to resort to the black market and barter (exchanging goods).
Who was affected? Pensioners and those on fixed income: Income lost value. Debtors: Benefitted from the boom as they could pay their debt off.
People with savings: Savings lost value.

97
Q

What were the left wing opposition movements?

A

-Spartacist uprising
-Red rising
-Political assassinations

98
Q

What were the right wing opposition movements?

A

-Kapp Putsch
-Munich Putsch
-Political assassinations

99
Q

When was the Spartacust uprising?

A

January 1919

100
Q

What was the Spartacist uprising?

A

• The Spartacists founded the KPD at the end of 1918.
• After his dismissal, Eichorn called for a demonstration to take place in Berlin. The USPD, KPD and local union
officials took up Eichorn’s call.
• On January 6, 1919, thousands of armed workers
poured into the centre of Berlin to demonstrate. Important buildings and offices were taken over, such as train stations and important newspaper offices.
• The leaders of the KPD and USPD called for a general strike, which around half a million workers responded to.

101
Q

Why did the Spartacist uprising oppose the Weimar Republic?

A

• The uprising was a result of the power struggle between the KPD and SPD. The only way for the KPD to meet its aims of a workers’ revolution was to rise up against the new government.
• On January 4, 1919, the Weimar government dismissed a popular police chief in Berlin (Emil Eichorn), who was a radical USPD member. This brought the government into open conflict with the workers’ councils and unions, and triggered the Spartacist Uprising.

102
Q

How did the Weimar government overcome the Spartacist uprising?

A

• The Weimar government hired the Freikorps to put down the rebellion. They quickly re-conquered the blocked streets and buildings and many of the rebels surrendered. 156 civilians and 17 Freikorps soldiers died during the fighting. The Spartacist’s leaders, Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht, were found on January 15 and executed.

103
Q

When as the Kapp putsch?

A

March 1920

104
Q

What was the Kapp putsch?

A

• This was an attempt to overthrow the Weimar government by Wolfgana Kapp and Freikorps leaders. The putsch had the support of Eric Ludendorff, who had been a military general during the First World War.
• They took over Berlin on March 12, 1920, causing the Weimar government to flee. The leaders proclaimed themselves the new government and said the Weimar Constitution was no longer in force.

105
Q

Why did the Kapp putsch oppose the Weimar Republic?

A

• Kapp and the paramilitary groups aimed to restore the empire and overturn the Treaty of Versailles. They wanted a strong, authoritative government that would return Germany to its old imperial system.

106
Q

How did the Weimar government overcome the Kapp putsch?

A

On November 15, 1918, Friedrich Ebert agreed the Stinnes- Legien Agreement with the leader of Germany’s trade unions. For the unions support, Ebert offered legislation (laws) on hours of work and union representation in the workplace. The majority of soldiers in the German army did not join in on Kapp’s putsch attempt. However, they would not fight the right-wing rebels. Kapp’s opposition movement failed after the trade unions called a general strike, demanding an end to the putsch attempt and a government under the leadership of the SPD. The general strike was widespread and brought Berlin to a standstill. After four days of strike action, the Kapp government fell.

107
Q

What was the Red rising?

A

• In the early years of Weimar rule, communist governments were set up in Bavaria (January 1919), the Ruhr (March 1920) and in Saxony and Thuringia (1921 and 1922), in attempts to takeover the regions.

108
Q

Why did the red rising oppose the Weimar Republic?

A

• The government was opposed by extremist groups on the left and right for a number of reasons, including its involvement in the Treaty of Versailles, the liberal and democratic principles it stood for, and its failure to produce a strong and decisive government and leader.
• The Organisation Consul was formed by members of a Freikorps unit which was disbanded (broken up) after its members participated in the Kapp Putsch to overthrow the German Weimar Republic.

109
Q

How did the Weimar Republic overcome the red rising?

A

• In all cases, the communist governments did not have enough popular support and were put down by the Reichswehr (the German army) using a system of Reichsexekution. On November 10, 1918, Friedrich Ebert agreed the Ebert-Groener Pact with the leader of the army. The army agreed to support the government as long as it opposed left-wing ideas of parties in the Reichstag.

110
Q

What were the political assassinations?

A

• Altogether, there were a total of 376 political assassinations in Germany between January 1919 and June 1922, carried out by anti-Weimar paramilitary groups. Right-wing extremist organisations, such as the group Organisation Consul, carried out 354 political assassinations during this time. This included the murder of prominent politicians, such as foreign minister Walther Rathenau.

111
Q

How did the Weimar Republic overcome political assassinations?

A

• Those involved in the assassinations o political figures were trialled under the judicial system of the Weimar Republic.
• Of the 354 murders committed by sympathisers of the right,
326 went unpunished. One life sentence and a total of 90 years imprisonment were handed out to those involved in political assassinations.
• Of the 22 murders committed by sympathisers of the left, four went unpunished. Ten death sentences, three life sentences and a total of 250 years in prison were handed out.

112
Q

When was the Munich Putsch?

A

November 1923

113
Q

What was the Munich putsch?

A

• Hitler and the NSDAP (the Nazis) believed they could gain the support of local politicians and citizens in Munich, and launched a takeover of Germany.
• On 8 November the SA (also known as Stormtroopers or Brown Shirts, this was the paramilitary group of the Nazi Party) surrounded a large beer cellar in Munich where Gustav von Kahr and other officials were in a meeting. Here, Hitler announced the government of Bavaria had been overthrown and he and Ludendorff were forming a new government. He locked von Karr and his officials in a room.

114
Q

Why did the Munich putsch oppose the Weimar Republic?

A

• The NSDAP took advantage of the rising unpopularity of the Weimar government, and its weakness and vulnerability (e.g. the invasion of the Ruhr and the hyperinflation crisis). The government had had to proclaim a State of Emergency in September 1923 following disturbances in the Rhineland (which declared independence) and Berlin.
• With Ludendorff on his side, Hitler was confident the army would follow him in a rebellion.
• The membership of the Nazi Party had grown considerably in 1923 from 6,000 to 55,000 members.
• In 1922, Mussolini had seized control of the government
of Italy by marching on Rome. Hitler hoped to copy his example.

115
Q

How did the Weimar Republic overcome the Munich putsch?

A

• Hitler’s political prisoners escaped and organised resistance to the putsch. The Nazis were defeated and captured by the police as they marched through Munich on November 9. Hitler was trialled for treason and received a sentence of five years imprisonment. The NSDAP was disbanded until 1925. Hitler was was released 9 months later.

116
Q

How did Ebert’s role as chancellor contribute to the survival of the WR?

A

-Helped stabilise WR while they faced lots of problems

117
Q

What were the potential problems with Ebert’s role as chancellor?

A

-Papering over cracks, no long term solution

118
Q

How did Ebert’s role in the Tov contribue to the survival of the wr?

A

-Forced into accepting TOV as it was only way forward for the wr

119
Q

What were the potential problems with Ebert’s role in the treaty of Versailles?

A

Many of German public outraged and thought Ebert was a traitor

120
Q

How did the Ebert groener pact contribute to th survival of the WR?

A

Critical factor in wr survival, deterred left wing radicalisas and moved towards democracy

121
Q

What were the potential problems of the Ebert groener pact?

A

Many on the LW called him a traitor and didn’t have full support

122
Q

How did Ebert as president contribue to survival of wr?

A

-Committed to democracy, fought off opposition parties and guided wr through ‘golden years’

123
Q

What were the potential problems of Ebert as president?

A

Didn’t have full support of the Reichstag so there were potential uprisings

124
Q

How did Ebert’s creation of the wr contribute to the survival of the wr?

A

Chaired the assembly that formulated Weimar system-helped Germany survive post war

125
Q

What were the potential problems of Ebert’s creation of the wr?

A

-Not all agreed with Ebert
-If it failed could fall back on him