Section 4 The Nazi Dictatorship Flashcards
What were Hitler’s government and administrative changes?
-For Hitler and his Nazi party, the coming to power in January 1933 was the beginning of a national socialist revolution. For Hitler this meant the conquest of political power. Many Nazis, however, especially the SA, had a very different view of the Nazi revolution
-This was to cause continuing tensions between Hitler and the SA during the early months of the Nazi regime
-For Hitler, the Nazi revolution began with acquiring dictatorial power, and then continued with the elimination of non Nazi political parties and other independent organisations, together with Nazi control over the i
What was the creation of a one party state?
-Hitler viewed conventional political parties with contempt, seeing them as mere election machines, which represented narrow, sectional interests rather than the interests of the nation as a whole
-He claimed that the Nazi party was the ‘racial core’ of the entire German people. Although it’s members were a minority of the population, even after a surge in party membership in 1933, Hitler believed it was nevertheless made up of superior Germans and was committed to fighting and sacrificing on behalf of the entire German people
-In the Nazi Volksgemeinschaft, therefore, there could be no parties other than the Nazi party
-By the middle of July 1933, this ambition had become a reality
What were the stages of creating a one party state?
-The KPD was effectively banned after the Reichstag fire in February. Most of the communists who had not been arrested and imprisoned in concentration camps had fled into exile
-Having stood up to Hitler in the Reichstag debate on the Enabling act in March, the SPD continued to voice its opposition to the regime until it was outlawed as a ‘party hostile to the nation and the state’ on 22nd June 1933
-Realizing that their days as political parties were numbered, the dnvp and the centre party dissolved themselves- the dnvp on 27th June and the centre party on 5th July
-On 14th July 1933, the law against the formation of new parties outlawed all non nazi political parties
How did the Nazis get centralisation of power and control over local government?
-The Weimar Republic was a federal state in which a large number of powers were devolved to state governments. Each state, for example, controlled its own police force. Prussia, the largest of the German states, comprised 60% of the territory and 50% of the population of the entire country
-It was so large that it’s state government could operate largely independently of the central government
-In July 1932, however, the Prussian state government had been dismissed by Papen and a reich commissioner had been appointed to run the state
-In Hitler’s cabinet after January 1933 this position was held by Goering. This paved the way for the centralisation of power within the whole reich, which the Nazis began in March 1933
What laws were passed on March 31st 1933?
First law for the coordination of the federal states dissolved the existing state assemblies and replaced them with Nazi dominated assemblies
What laws were passed on 7th April 1933?
-The second law for the coordination of the federal states created the new post of reich Governor to oversee the government of each state
-These new RG’s were accountable to the minister of the interior and responsible for ensuring that the state governments followed the policies laid down by the central government
What was the Nazis organisation structure?
-The nazi party had its own organisational structures at both national and local level. At state level the Nazi leaders, known as Gauleiters, wanted to control local government and many of them took over the roles of reich governors within their areas
-The Nazis also instituted violent campaigns to oust political opponents from important local positions, such as town mayors, and replace them with Nazi party nominees
-However, the precise relationship between the party and the state at local level, as at national level, was never clearly defined
What laws were passed on 30th January 1934?
-The law for the reconstruction of the reich took the centralisation process a stage further. State assemblies were abolished and the governments of the states were formally subordinated to the government of the reich
-This meant that the posts of RGs had now become redundant but Hitler did not abolish the posts. Rivalry and tension between state governments and RGs continued in the coming years
What laws were passed on 14th February 1934?
The Reichsrat was abolished. This was the parliamentary assembly to which the state assemblies sent delegates. Since the state assemblies no longer existed, it was a logical next step to abolish the Reichsrat
How did the Nazis gain control over the civil service?
-Under the Kaiser, civil servants enjoyed a status almost on par with that of soldiers. The higher ranks of the civil service were recruited almost exclusively from the aristocracy and civil servants closely identified with the authoritarian values of the second empire
-These conservative minded civil servants would not embrace the democratic values of the Weimar Republic and many welcomed Hitler’s appointment in 1933
-Their support for the new regime was based, however, on a misunderstanding. They believed that the conservative ministers in Hitler’s cabinet would restrain the Nazis and allow the civil service to continue serving the state in much the same way that it had done under the Kaiser
-What they had failed to understand was that the Nazis had no intention of being bound by the rules and regulations that civil servants had to follow
-The Nazis regarded the civil service as an obstacle to their exercise of dictatorial power. Many local officials were forced to resign and were replaced by Nazi party appointees, most of whom had no experience of government
-The nazi SA also began to place party officials in government offices to ensure that civil servants were carrying out the orders of that regime
-All of this placed the Nazis firmly in control
What were the SA’s position from January-February 1933?
-In January 1933, the SA was the Nazis main instrument of terror and violence. One of the immediate results of the Nazis coming to power was the rapid expansion of the SA. From a membership of around 500,000 in January 1933, the organisation grew to around 3 million strong a year later
-Another result of the Nazis being in power was that the actives of the SA gained legal authority. In late February 1933, the SA and Stahlhelm were merged and became recognised as ‘auxiliary police’
-Orders were used to the regular police forces forbidding them from interfering with SA activities
What was the position of the SA between February and June 1933?
-Hitler benefited from the violence of his supporters, but he was not always in control of events. Much of the violence of the SA against the Nazis political opponents, and against the Jews, was unplanned, uncoordinated and piecemeal.
-In the period between February and June 1933, when the Nazis were eliminating opposition and establishing undisputed control, Hitler was prepared to go with the flow of SA violence
-He was careful to ensure, however, that the SA did not attack the state itself
-Assaults on the police and the army were avoided, as Hitler was careful not to alienate those conservative forces that had shoe horned him into power
-Violence was a vital tool in the hands of the Nazi leadership but, in its uncontrolled form, it’s usefulness was limited and at some point Hitler was bound to want to call a halt
What was the position of the SA in July 1933?
-Hitler was warning that, in the future, the SA could become the target for nazi violence and terror. He did not, however, act on this warning for a further 11 months. In July 1933, after passing the law against formation of new parties, Hitler was able to declare that the Nazi revolution was over
-He had acquired dictatorial powers, all other parties had been banned or had voluntarily dissolved themselves and the process od Gleichschaltung had been completed
-For Ernst Rohm, the leader of the SA, however, the Nazi revolution was far from complete and the SA were determined to continue with their violence until they had achieved the second revolution
-Chief among Rohm’s aims was for the SA to become the nucleus of a new national militia that would eventually absorb and replace the existing army
What was the position of the SA by January 1934?
-With a combined SA and Stahlhelm membership of 4.5 million in January 1934, Rohm’s forces already vastly outnumbered the army. However, since the summer of 1933 the role and importance of the SA had declined
-In august 1933, they had lost their ‘auxiliary police’ status and were subject to stricter regulations over their powers of arrest.
-In the election campaign of November 1933, there was only 1 party, hence there was no longer a need for SA violence and intimidation. Lacking an ‘official’ outlet for their violence, and feeling resentment at the way that former conservative opponents of the Nazis were allowed to join the Nazi party and take important jobs in local and central government, SA members became disillusioned and restless
-Drunken brawls, always a feature of the SA, became increasingly common and the police became targets of the SA when they tried to intervene
What happened at the Night of the long knives?
-The army remained the only institution with the power to remove Hitler from office. It was also loyal to Hindenburg, not to Hitler. Despite the fact that Werner von Bloomberg, the defence minister,had brought it closer to Nazi ideology, the army was not a nazified institution and still retained some independence
-The ambitions of the SA and it’s leader Rohm were regarded as a serious threat by the army leaders, the more so when in the summer of 1934 SA units began stopping army convoys and confiscating weapons and supplies
-Moreover the pressure on Hitler increased on 17th June, when Papen made a major speech at Marburg university in which he criticised Nazi excesses
-Papen called for an end to terror and for Hitler to clamp down on the SA’s calls for a second revolution. Papen’s speech had Hindenburg’s approval and, despite Goebells efforts to censor it, it was reported to the press
What happened after Papen’s speech in June 1934?
-When Bloomberg, again with Hindenburg’s support, threatened to declare martial law and give the army power to deal with the SA, matters came to a head
-Hitler had dithered since the spring of 1934, delaying taking decisive action against the SA, but in June he knew he could wait no longer
-A ruthless purge of the SA, known as the ‘night of the long knives’, was launched on 30th June 1934 when the SS, acting on Hitler’s orders, eliminated the leadership of the SA and many other political opponents of the Nazis
What happened after the night of the long knives?
-When Hitler addressed the Reichstag on 13th July, he accepted full responsibility for the executions. He was acting, he said as the ‘supreme judge’ of the German people and had been compelled to act in order to save the country from an SA coup
-This secured the army’s support. Hitler also gained public support for his apparently decisive actions. The SA declined sharply after the purge. By october 1935, it’s membership had declined to 1.6 million and, without Rohm as its leader, it’s political power was destroyed
-Violence and terror remained vital weapons in the Nazi party’s efforts to retain political control but, after the night of the long knives, the SS controlled the terror machine
-After the events of June 1934, violence and terror were used more systematically and in a more controlled manner
What was the impact of Hindenburg’s death in August 1934?
-Before his death Hindenburg had become so concerned by the excesses of the SA that he considered handing power to the army and dismissing Hitler. His views were shared by many commanders and by Papen, and Hitler was left in no doubt that, unless he brought the SA under control, he could not count on the army’s support once Hindenburg had died
-This was the trigger that led Hitler to launch the purge of the SA. With the threat of the SA removed, Bloomberg and the army leaders had no further objection to Hitler succeeding Hindenburg as president
What happened on the day and days after Hindenburg’s death?
-Hindenburg died on 2nd august 1934. The announcement that the office of president would be merged with that of chancellor was made within an hour of his death.
-In the same day the officers and soldiers of the army took an oath of allegiance to Hitler
-On 19th august, a plebiscite was held to get the German peoples seal of approved on Hitler’s appointment as Fuhrer and reich chancellor, the title by which he was henceforth to be known
-The result was that 89.9% of the voters approved of the change. More surprising perhaps was the fact that the other 10.1% of the voters had the courage to vote no
-This was the final act in the Nazi consolidation of power. Hitler had asserted his authority over his own party and become fuhrer
What happened with the Nazis and the law in the ‘terror state’?
-Hitler was determined that the Nazi regime would not be bound by the law and legal systems. The Nazi concept of authority was based on the leadership principle. As a ‘man of destiny’, who had been chosen to lead the third Reich Germany and express the will of people, Hitler’s word was law
-The Nazis did not introduce a new constitution or legal system after 1933. Instead they introduced some new laws to deal with political offences and forced the existing justice system to adapt and bend to their will
-At the same time, they introduced new courts and new police organisations to ensure that political opponents were dealt with
-The result was that in Nazi Germany, the legal principles on which german law has been based in the Weimar period no longer applied
-No longer were all citizens treated as equal before the law. The judges were not permitted to operate independently of the government
-Individuals could be arrested and imprisoned without trial, without the police having to produce any evidence against them. The law was applied in an arbitrary and inconsistent fashion
What was the police system in the third Reich?
-In the Weimar Republic, individual state authorities controlled the police forces. The Nazis did not abolish these separate police forces but created a system of party controlled, political police forces answerable to Hitler, which gradually gained control over the entire police system
-This proliferation of police forces created confusion and competition, both between the various police forces and between the powerful men who controlled them. The following forces existed:
-The ss, controlled by Himmler
-The SD, an intelligence gathering offshoot of the SA
-The SA, controlled by Rohm, in 1933. The SA also acquired police powers to arrest and detain political prisoners
-The gestapo, the secret state police force in Prussia, of which Goering was the minister president. During 1933, the remit of the Gestapo was extended to cover the whole country
What was the competition and rivalry during 1933 for control over the police?
-Between 1933 and 1936, there was competition and rivalry between Himmler, Rohm and Goering for control over the police. Himmler’s power was strengthened by the night of the long knives in 1934 in which Rohm was eliminated and the SA’s powers were reduced
-Himmler was also able to exploit the rivalry between Goering and the minister of the interior, Wilhelm Frick. The situation was partially resolved in 1936 when the SS, SD and Gestapo were placed under Himmler’s command
-Himmler’s victory was sealed in 1939 with the creation of the Reich security department headquarters (RHSA), which placed all part and state police organisations under one organisation supervised by the SS
What were the SS?
-‘Schutz Staffel’ under the control of Heinrich Himmler
-Hitler’s personal bodyguards
-Only physically strong Aryans recruited
-Fiercely loyal to the Fuhrer
-Had power to search and arrest without trial
What were the concentration camps used in the ‘terror state’?
-First used in Germany in 1933
-Prisons for ‘enemies of the state’ e.g political opponents, communists, Jews, gypsies, those who refused to conform
-Used for torture, questioning and hard labour
-Runnby ‘Death’s head’ arm of the SS by late 1930s, inmates used for slave labour in Nazi run businesses
What were the SD?
-Set up in 1931 as the intelligence body of the Nazi party
-Main aim was to discover actual and potential enemies and make sure they were removed
-Attracted many professional and highly educated people such as lawyers
What were the Gestapo?
-State secret police, run by Rudolf Diels and then the SS
-Telephone taps, mail interception
-Recruited 160,000 informers to report anyone who was anti Nazi
-Powers to arrest without trial
What were ‘informers’ in the terror state?
-‘Block wardens’ In charge of Nazi loyalty in local areas
-Collected donations and dues
-Checked whether people saluted, hung Nazi flags etc
-Wrote reports on party members
What were the courts and justice system like in the ‘terror state’?
-Judges and lawyers were generally very conservative but belonged to the Nazi party in January 1933. The long tradition of freedom from political interference for lawyers and judges posed a problem for the Nazis, as the violence and intimidation carried out by the SA and SS was clearly illegal and many prosecution against stormtroopers were begun by lawyers a who were determined to uphold the law
-Hitler was also angered by the fact that the Supreme Court acquitted all but one of the defendants of the Reichstag fire trial
-A few judges and state prosecutors were dismissed by the regime
What were more effective methods of ‘coordinating’ the justice system?
-The merging of the various professional associations of judges and lawyers with the league of national socialist lawyers, creating the front of German law in April 1933. It was made clear to judges and lawyers that their career prospects depended on their doing the regimes bidding
-Introducing new courts. Special courts were set up in 1933 and the peoples court in April 1934 to run alongside the existing court system. These courts, set up to deal with political crimes, had 3 Nazi ‘judges’ alongside 2 professional judges. There were no juries and defendants had no rights of appeal against their sentences
What was the effect on the courts and justice system due to the measures put on them?
-With these measured, backed by threats from the SA and SS, lawyers and judges fell into line. Although the old court system continued to exist, and many non Nazi judges continued in their jobs, the justice system had no power to infer free with the Nazis use of terror
-Between 1934 and 1939, around 3400 people were tried by the peoples court, most of whom were former communists and socialists. Many of those brought before the courts were given the death penalty, which was used increasingly in the third Reich
What was the extent and effectiveness of opposition and non conformity?
-To a large extent this propaganda appears to have been effective. The Gestapo, with it’s limited resources, could not have instilled fear and suspicion to the extent that it achieved without the cooperation of many ordinary citizens
-On the whole, there was very little active opposition and there was evidence of Hitler’s increasing popularity. Life in Nazi Germany became depoliticised; there was no open and free debate about the regime of its policies
What action did the SPD take in resistance?
Campaigned openly for the election campaign. Established small secret cells of supporters in factories.
Why did the SPD oppose the Nazis?
Opposite political beliefs
How effective was the SPD’s resistance?
Managed to set up cells and pass leaflets however a lot of members killed and threat of Nazi pressure stopped them
How did the Nazis respond to the SPD resistance?
Began to crush the SPD, thousands murdered or put in preventative custody
What action did the KPD take in resistance to the Nazis?
Established an underground network in some German industrial centres, revolutionary unions were set up in Berlin and Hamburg to recruit members and publish newspapers
How effective was the KPD’s resistance?
All networks broken up by Gestapo and 10% of KPD membership killed
How did the Nazis respond to the KPDs resistance?
Wave of repression unleashed upon communists in Germany. 10% of KPD membership killed, broke up networks and reduced communists to word of mouth discovery
Why did the workers oppose the Nazis?
Largest unions in Germany linked to the SPD and had been consistently opposed to Nazi party
What action did the workers take in resistance?
September 1935, 37 strikes reported, whole of 1937, 250 strikes recorded. Deliberately damaged workers machinery
How effective was the workers resistance?
Only 4000 out of 25000 workers who participated were arrested and were effective for workers to show their dissatisfaction
How did the Nazis respond to the workers resistance?
After a 17 minute strike at the Opel car factory in 1936, 7 ringleaders were arrested by the Gestapo and imprisoned, made ‘sabotage’ a criminal offence
Why did the Protestant church oppose the Nazis?
Divided by the Nazi regime trying to include them in Volksgemeinschaft and general policies clashed
What action did the Protestant church take in resistance to the Nazis?
Establishment of the pastors emergency league in 1933 and development into confessional church in 1934. Pastors spoke out against the ‘nazified church’ from their pulpits. Many churches refused to display swastika flags
How effective was the resistance of the Protestant church?
The Nazi regime had failed to silence the confessional church, but for its part, the confessional church did not form full opposition to the regime. Group who did however did have some success
How did the Nazis respond to the resistance of the Protestant church?
Nazi regime responded with increased repression, dissenting pastors had their salaries stopped, they were banned from teaching in schools and many were arrested. By the end of 1937 over 700 pastors had been imprisoned?
Why did the Catholic Church oppose the Nazis?
Views clashed with Christianity. Powers granted in the condo at of 1933 came under attack church found itself increasingly at odds with the regime
What action did the Catholic Church take in resistance to the Nazis?
In 1937 the pope issued the papal encyclical ‘with burning grief’ against the background of mounting pressure on the Catholic Church in Germany. It was smuggled into Germany and this was the only time that the Catholic Church came in to open conflict with the regime. Response was some noisy public demonstrations
How effective was the resistance of the Catholic Church?
Church pulpits all read the encyclical however intimidation of priests worked and scared Catholics
How did the Nazis respond to the resistance of the Catholic Church.
Increased repression. Intimidation and harassment of priests
Increasing expectations on young people within youth and Hitler youth and BDM especially.