Secondary forest and degraded land restoration Flashcards

1
Q

Forest and Landscape Restoration (FLR)

A

Late 2015: >400 ppm for first time in human history

Late 2018: 417 ppm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  • Warmed by 0.87°C since 1951-80 baseline
A
  • 2015 hottest year in instrumental record
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Paris Agreement

A

2015 United Nations Framework Convention of Climate Change meeting
Restrict future temperature increase to 2°C…
…preferably to 1.5°C
Emphasises urgency of drastically cutting fossil fuel emissions
Assumes deployment of solutions to remove CO2 from atmosphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

2.2 billion ha of degraded lands

A

What is land degradation?

Overexploitation of natural capital
“Any reduction or loss in the biological or economic productive capacity of the land caused by human activities…often magnified by climate changeand biodiversity loss”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Degradation impacts?

A

Loss of landscape productivity & resilience
 prone to floods, landslides & droughts
Ecological, social and economic threat
40% of intrastate conflicts over 60 years linked to natural resources
Desertification will displace 135 million people by 2045
>70% countries declare climate change / land degradation as national security issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Forest & Landscape Restoration

A

Big problems need big solutions

Governments and international organizations are pushing the FLR agenda

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“Restore 150 million hectares of the world’s deforested and degraded lands by 2020 and 350 million hectares by 2030.”

Bonn Challenge

A

Enshrined in the New York Declaration on Forests, announced at the United Nations Climate Summit (Suding et al. 2015 Science)

intended National Determined Contributions (iNDCs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

By 2030…

Bonn Challenge

A
Brazil – 12 Mha
Cameroon – 12 Mha
Chad – 5 Mha
Ethiopia – 15 Mha
India – 21 Mha
Ivory Coast – 5 Mha
Kenya – 5 Mha
Madagascar – 4 Mha
Malawi – 4.5 Mha
USA – 15 Mha
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What counts as FLR?

A
Range of restoration activities to better meet human needs (incl. carbon sequestration)
Natural forest regeneration
Often unplanned & uncoordinated
Ecological restoration, lower economic benefits?
Multi-species silvicultural systems
Recover range of Ecosystem Services (ES)
Monoculture tree plantations
Goods, e.g., timber, pulpwood, firewood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Key characteristics of FLR

A

Local stakeholders actively involved
Whole landscapes are restored
Mosaic of activities
Reduces tradeoffs between conflicting interests
Provide for an agreed, balanced combination of ES and goods
Complement and enhance food production
Not cause natural forest conversion to plantations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Value for biodiversity?

A

Gilroy et al. 2014 Nature Climate Change

Rare bird species recover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Expanding forest protection

A

Half of carbon stock recovered in 30 yrs
Much recovery of primary forest biodiversity
Includes IUCN Red-listed + endemic spp.
Big carbon-biodiversity co-benefits of natural forest restoration on abandoned farmland in Tropical Andes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Restoration via tree plantations

A
China’s Grains-for-Green Program
Largest reforestation program on Earth
Pay rural households to re-establish forest on sloped marginal cropland
’99-’13 = 27.8 Mha of forest, US$46.9 Bn
Restoration goals
Timber, tree fruits, other cash crops
Reduce landslides, erosion, flooding
Biodiversity not explicitly considered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

China’s Grains-for-Green Program

Conclusion: Economically viable to add more consideration of biodiversity benefits to GFGP

A

38% of mixed forest = 2-5 tree species

82% of monoculture = eucalyptus, bamboo, japanese cedar

36% of semi-mixed forest = monoculture tree + 1-2 shrub/grass species

Improved bird richness with mixed ..but not bee richness with mixed
More specialist birds with mixed
Mixed FLR is not more expensive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Promoting FLR at massive scales

A
Natural regeneration
2001-10
\+36 Mha
Marginal
Dry
Steep
High

Olson et al., 2001

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

(Inter-)Governmental investment

A

National programs
China’s GFGP
Brazil’s Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact (under Bonn Challenge)
REDD+
Enhancement of forest carbon stocks
Cheaply promote further abandonment of marginal farmland?

17
Q

Unleashing the power of the market

A

Scale of FLR beyond financial capacity of many governments, NGOs & aid agencies
Take advantage of market forces?
FLR must produce EGS with financial value&raquo_space; opportunity costs of degrading activities
Government role to support transformation of FLR into a new economic activity
Create incentives for positive FLR actions

Brancalion, Edwards et al. 2017 Forest Policy & Economics

18
Q

Market & FLR = economies of scale

A

Growing cost advantages with increasing size of operations
Many EGS need large spatial scale
Watershed reserves, erosion prevention
Functional connectivity (vs fragmentation)

19
Q

FLR is ‘big’ field of activity, like agriculture & infrastructure  similar incentive types
Tackle ‘free rider’ problem (beneficiaries do not pay) to promote green business
FLR has broad potential to generate jobs and income, alleviate poverty, & deliver EGS with economic value to society, but…
If viewed as narrowly-focused environmental activity, likely to fail

A

Land tenure

New policies to leverage a massive engagement of landholders
Will FLR improve livelihoods?
Or will market-based approaches deepen existing inequalities, or even produce new ones?
Brancalion, Edwards et al. 2017 Forest Policy & Economics

20
Q

Pitfalls of using markets

A

Restoration divert resources from protection of threatened ecosystems and species

Markets are ineffective to determine the best type of restoration

Markets are ineffective to influence the appropriate location of restoration

Strategies to foster large-scale restoration may undermine the interests of local people

Imbalances for markets for ecosystem good versus services

21
Q

Supportive regulations

A

Economic mechanisms - reduce costs or increase profits of restoration (subsidies, loans, direct payments, or tax breaks)

Technological, educational, or infrastructural investment - alter the spatial pattern of agriculture to create space for restoration

Market-led standards and certification schemes - provide access to lucrative markets and/or a price premium to companies engaged in restoration

Legal and enforcement mechanisms - create laws that promote restoration, improve the enforcement of laws

22
Q

Summary

A

Preventing >2C warming requires Negative Emissions Technologies

> 2 Bn hectares of degraded land globally

Forest Landscape Restoration agenda

  • Sequester carbon
  • Return other Ecosystem Goods & Services

Unleash the power of the market?

  • Government-led
  • Improved local livelihoods (landholders?)
  • Research into avoiding potential pitfalls