Protected Areas Flashcards

1
Q

History

A

Historical PA movement: Motivations: religion & resource management
Late 19th century PA movement: Yellowstone NP in 1872
Motivations: wilderness preservation
Modern PA movement: Motivations: species, habitats, ecosystem services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A Protected Area is…

A

Previously over 1000 definitions, defined by national legislation
Need for standardisation raised in 1962 World Parks Conference
IUCN agreed definitions in 1994, revised in 2008

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A Protected Area is…
‘an area of land and/or sea especially dedicated to the protection and maintenance of biological diversity, and of natural and associated cultural resources, and managed through legal or other effective means’ (IUCN 1994)

A

‘a clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long-term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values’ (IUCN 2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

IUCN Categories IUCN categories established to:

A
  • Capture full range of protected area values • Help global accounting & comparisons
  • Reduce confusion over protected area names & types across various countries
  • Promote international standards
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

IUCN Categories
• Ia - Strict Nature Reserve: protected area managed mainly for science e.g. Sundarbarns NP, India
• Ib - Wilderness Area: protected area managed mainly for wilderness protection

A
  • II - National Park: protected area managed mainly for ecosystem protection and recreation e.g. Kakadu, Australia
  • III - Natural Monument: protected area managed mainly for conservation of specific natural features e.g. Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

IUCN Categories
• IV - Habitat/Species Management Area: protected area managed mainly for conservation through management intervention e.g. Selous game reserve, Tanzania
• V - Protected Landscape/Seascape: protected area managed mainly for landscape/seascape conservation and recreation e.g. Dartmoor NP

A

• VI - Managed Resource Protected Area: protected area managed mainly for the sustainable use of natural ecosystems e.g. Kiunga Marine National Reserve, Kenya

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Currently the extent of terrestrial and marine PAs are going up but the living planet index is falling (more for terrestrial than for marine)

A

Mora & Sale 2011 Marine Ecology Progress Series 434, 251-266

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Current PAs major issues

A
- Overall extent
• Biaseddistribution
• Individualprotectedareasize
• Isolation
• Inadequate protection
• Future threats
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Total area protected

A

25000000 km^2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Aichi target #11

A

Currently missing 3million km^2 of terrestrial PAs and 11 million km^2 of marine PAs for 2020 target

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Restoration & Aichi target 11

A

Currently need shortfall of protected areas to be met by protection of unconverted lands but this is not true in India, and China and Malaysia and Indonesia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Biased distribution - marine

A

Hotspots best 2% of cells for endangered marine mammals

Little overlap between hotspots & MPAs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Biased distribution - terrestrial

A

Protected areas often established due to lack of economic potential
Related to opportunity & availability rather than biological characteristics
Gap analysis - Rodrigues et al 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Pouzols et al. 2014 Nature 516, 383-386

A

Cumulative average coverage of species ranges in different fractions of terrestrial land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Kopnina 2016 Half the earth for people (or more)? Addressing ethical questions in conservation Biological Conservation 203, 176-185

A

50% of terrestrial biomes
Needed for viable populations & ecosystem services
Feasible? – loss of habitat & social impacts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Half of protected areas are under 10km^2

A

But most species need >10km^2 for functioning

17
Q

Individual protected area size

A

Declining size of new sites
Can’t maintain viable populations of species that require large home ranges
Edge effects greater relative influence in small reserves

18
Q

Increasing isolation

A

Fragmentation and edge effects

19
Q

Inadequate protection - multiple threats

A

Human encroachment and resource extraction are common
204 parks in 16 tropical countries Van Schiak et al. 1997
Poaching, logging, encroachment

20
Q

Reserve effectiveness
Laurence et al 2012 Nature 489, 290-294
60 reserves across the tropics: Africa, Asia and the Americas
Interviews 20-30 yrs change in: 31 animal and plant groups
21 environmental change drivers inside and outside reserve

A

Many reserves are suffering and losing biodiversity

21
Q

Reserve health increases with increased protection

A

Internal and external pressures correlate such as temperature, rain, wind, flooding, drought, air and water pollution

22
Q

Two possible solutions:

1. Parks focus/fortress conservation: - forceful exclusion of local people (gorilla protectress being killed)

A
  1. People focus/community based conservation:
    People allowed to benefit from resources in exchange for protecting the PA (seahorse protectress supporting seahorse medicine market and conservation of populations)
23
Q

Kibale NP, UGANDA

A

People living on park edges are poorer and the poor experience lowest growth in wealth - park as a poverty trap?

But risk of land loss for the poor inversely correlated with proximity to the park
89% of villagers on park edge want access for timber, but it is illegal
38% illegally extract timber, significant reductions with resource access agreements (honey hives)
$250 increased income

McKenzie et al 2011 Environmental Conservation 39, 38-50 Naughton-Treves et al 2011 PNAS 108, 13919-13924

24
Q

Van der Braber et al 2018 Conservation Letters

https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12576

A

Inequality and Poverty in PAs

25
Q

Inadequate protection? - but the best available?

A

IUCN red list 181 mammal species exhibited genuine changes in conservation status: 144 declined & 37 improved
All species occurred in PAs, so in isolation not effective for delivering conservation, but part of the solution

26
Q

Human population growth and urbanisation is expanding

A

in PA buffer zones more than rural zones

27
Q

PAs in the future: what about climate change?

A

Predicted turn-over in priority avian species in African IBAs

Turnover > 50% at 42% of sites

But 90% of species retain climate space in IBAs

7-8 species have no climatic representation

28
Q

Future threats

Hole et al 2011 Conservation Biology 25, 305-315

A

Best cells for priority species in three future time periods

PAs index of added value considering dispersal

29
Q

PAs and range shifts

A

species colonise protected areas

30
Q

Summary
Rapid growth in PAs but continuing declines in biodiversity
Much discussion of appropriate coverage targets

A

Numerous problems with PAs and their biodiversity is often in decline
Total exclusion of people from PAs rarely works
PAs can be effective, including in the future, but spatial
planning and management need to be improved