Scientific Literature Flashcards
Scientific vs. nonscientific sources
Scientific: for science community, structured, formal, peer-reviewed, citations, cautious
Non-scientific: general audience, informal format, simple terminology, not peer-reviewed, definite answers
Keyword search/ Boolean operators
Use keyboards to describe phenomenon/ synonyms
And
Or
Not
( X OR Y) AND (X OR Y)
“ XY” gives you XY and not X and Y
Electronic databases
Google scholar
PubMed
ScienceDirect
Web of science
PsychInfo
Steps of literature search
- Screening results
- Secondary sources
Systematic and narrative reviews
Systematic:
Transparency, high level of evidence, not influenced by researchers, quality of studies
-> meta analyses:
-special case of systematic
Quantitative not just qualitative
Narrative:
Informal and poorly described, biases, keywords not identified, simply provides background on topic
Research reports
Integral part of research process,
Journal: ca 5000 words, thesis longer
Different types require different reviewing
Basic statistics are necessary
Reports very systematic but don’t give every detail of research
Research reports structure
Title, abstract, Introduction, method, results, discussion, references, appendixes
Short but simple sentences
Paragraphs
Subheadings
Avoid personal pronouns
Past tense
Less than 10? Write one two instead of 1 2
No quotations
Title, abstract, introduction
Attracts attention, 12-20 words, no clickbait
Major aspects, 150-250 words, approx. 5 keywords
Importance of research topic
Empirical data
unresolved issue
Definitions
Review of previous research
Research aim
Hypothesis
Citation journal article
Author, A. A., & Author B. B. (Year). Title. Name of periodical, volume(issue), page-page. Link
Citation book
Author A. A., & Author B. B. (Copyright year). Title (edition). Publisher. DOI or URL
Chapter in edited book
Author, A. A., Author B. B. (Copyright year). Title of chapter l. In A. A. Editor & B. B. Editor (Eds.), Title of book (edition., page-page). Publisher. DOI or URL
Fishing
Inventing hypothesis after gathering data
Falsifies the data
Data fabrication
Withholding raw data and claiming an effect is wrong
Open science to check vand verify data
Conflict of interest