Experimental Design Flashcards

1
Q

Unrelated design

A

Also known: between subject, between participants, independent groups etc

TWO DIFFERENT HROUPS ARE COMPARED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Related design

A

Also known: within subject, within participants, repeated measures, dependent groups

Comparison between same groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why experimental design

A
  • Required for special equipment (eg. EEG)
  • keeps all factors constant other than manipulated variable
  • easier to draw conclusions about causalit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Non-experimental design

A

Not possible to rule out cometong explanations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

non experimental vs experimental

A

Non experimental: how many drivers honked at a car parked at green light

Experimental: testing in cool and hot environments to see if aggression raises with hot environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

True (randomized) experiment

A
  1. Random assignment
  2. Experimental manipulation of independent variables
  3. Standardization
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Experimental manipulation (independent vs dependent)

A

Indep. Variable: assume t to cause affect on another variable, manipulated by researchers

Dep. variable: measured for changes affected by experimental manipulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Experimental manipulation

A
  • uncertainty as to wether or not the manipulation worked
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Standardization of procedures

A
  • Ideally, experimental and control conditions are identical in every way but the variable is manipulated
  • constant factors (experiment, participants characteristics)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Aim of randomization

A
  • control differences between participants
  • avoid systematic biases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Confounding variable

A

Uncrontrolled and systematic varying between independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Matching

A

Controlling for difference between participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Pre-Tests

A

Seeing if there are underlying differences between the group that could effect the interpretation of the experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Advanced experimental design

A
  • Increasing th levels of indep. Variable
  • using two or more independent variables
  • using more than one dependent variable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Analytical plan

A

Omnibus Test: wether indep. Variable has significant effect: DOES IT TELL US WHICH CONDITIONS ATE DIFFERENT CROM EAVH OTHER

Post-hoc comparison: determine which condition differ significantly from another -> compositions are between the conditions

  • family-wise/experiment-wise error rate: more comparisons-> greater likelihood of significant comparisons that are through chance (unnecessary comparisons)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Multiple independent variables

A

Factorial design: studies 2 or more independent variables

Advantages:
- fewer cases are needed
- greater generalization

17
Q

Issues with experimental design

A
  • issue with interaction between participants and experimenter
  • inappropriate or unethical (e.g.child deprivation)
  • lack of control wether participants follow instructions
  • participants know they’re in an experiment
18
Q

Placebo

A
  • expectation about effect causes therapeutic change
    -> deception
    Double blind experiment: both participant and research administrator are not aware of it