Reliability And Validity Flashcards

1
Q

Reliability

A

Consistent measurement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Validity

A

Does it measure what it should

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Internal reliability

A

Consistency of the measured items
- perfect internal reliability: any set of items from scale could be selected and will provide a measure that is more or less the same as any other group of items
- internal consistency: respondents answer related items similarly
- in some cases measurement that covers several different aspects is desirable (creates low internal consistency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of internal realiability

A
  • traditional approach: Pearson correlation (each half is similar)
  • split-half reliability: each participants summed scores are calculated separately for both halves of items
  • odd- even realiability: one half of items is odd numbered the other even
  • spearman-brown formula: estimation of true split half with correlation to length of scale

Reply on particular items in two halves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cronbach Alpha

A

Average of every possible half correlated to every other possible half
A>0.70 (adequate)
A>0.95 (too high)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Realiability coefficients

A
  • removing items causing internal reliability to be lower
  • common method: computer cronbach a for total scale and see how it changes when removing items
  • stop if satisfactory value is achieved
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Item total correlations

A
  • correlations of participants score on each item with their overall score
  • if all of the individual items on the scale are measuring the same structure, all items correlate with total score on scale
  • removing items with low item total correlations
  • low item correlation: inconsistent item with possibility measures a diff psych construct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Item discrimination between extreme groups

A
  • removing those items which have low discrimination with people scoring low or high
  • high reliability: if items are differently answered by highscorers -> item retained
  • low reliability: items which highscorers are the same as lowscorers -> item dropped
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reliability over time

A
  • consistency of measure at different time across different circumstances
  • test-retest reliability:
  • > repeated measurement/ longitudinal design
  • > longer interval between: more opportunity for within subject
  • > carry over effect: test and immediate retest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Face validity

A

You read it and you check if the item measures what you want to measure
High face validity: makes people more motivated but also more prone to lying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Content validity

A

Optimal content validity: careful collections of items that is diverse for the concept being assessed
-> alternative: content validity achieved by experts decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Criterion validity

A
  • exploring wether scores on a given psychological test are successfully related to know criteria
    -> concurrent
    -> predictive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Concurrent validity

A

Assessed against a criterion measuring same construct
- calculating correlation of the test with another test for same construct
- > ideally a strong correlation (but if it’s a new theoretical construct, a lower correlation is better)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Predictive validity

A
  • ability of measure to predict future events

Not all measurements intend on predicting future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Construct validity

A

Aim: specify the nature of psychological construct that underlies given measurement
Support for construct validity: depends on assumptions regarding nature of construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Triangulation

A

Two different measures with same construct will correlate with variable the construct might relate to

-> combination of concurrent and predictive validity
(If A and B correlate-> concurrent)
(If A and B correlate to X -> predictive)

17
Q

Known groups validity

A
  • evidence of optimal validity: can be established that scores on a measure differ in predictable ways between 2 specified groups
18
Q

Convergent validity

A

-measures of given psych construct should relate irrespective of the nature or more of the measure

19
Q

Discrimination validity

A
  • if measures measure different construct no correlation is expected