Sampling Methods Flashcards
Samples selected without bias from a list of the entire target population
Random
Stratified
Systematic
Samples selected with the potential of bias
Opportunity and volunteer sampling
Random Sampling
A sample generated by identifying a lost of the target population and randomly selecting participants from this list (in an unbiased way)
The names of the entire target population can be put into a hat and drawn at random; alternatively, names could be randomly generated using a computer database.
Therefore, each member of the target population has an equal chance of being selected.
Random Sampling Strength HPV
Unlike opportunity Sampling, where the researcher chooses the sample based on who is available at the time of the study, a strength is that it can often generate a sample with high population validity,
Which is when the results can be successfully generalised to the target population, increasing the external validity of research.
As each member of the target population has an equal chance of being selected, the sample is likely to be highly representative.
Random Sampling Strength LEB
Unlike opportunity sampling, where the researcher chooses the sample based on who is available at the time of the study, a strength us that it has low experimenter bias,
Which is when the experimenter cannot show unintentional bias in the selection of the participants, increasing the internal validity of research
This is because the researcher doesn’t actively choose individuals as participants are selected in an unbiased manner
Random Sampling Limitation LPV
A limitation is that it may not always generate a sample with high population validity
Which is extent to which results can be successfully generalised to the target population
Although the selection of participants is unbiased, the actual sample may be biased in some way if only one type of person is selected.
For example, by chance only female participants may be selected from a group of males and females, meaning the sample may not be representative of the population.
Random Sampling limitation I
It is impractical,
As the full list of the target population may be difficult or impossible to obtain
For example, it may be difficult or impossible to define a complete list of all schizophrenics, meaning the sample drawn may be biased and this method cannot be used to study behaviour where no list of the target population exists
Stratified Sampling
A sample generated by identifying a list of the entire target population as well as the characteristics which are important to the research (e.g. gender) before randomly selecting a ratio that reflects these groups (or strata)
If the target population is 40%female and 60% male, participants are drawn randomly until they reach this ratio, so the sample is representative of the structure of the target population
Stratified Sampling Strength HPV
Unlike opportunity sampling, where only those people who are available at the time of the study can be selected, a strength is that it can often generate a sample with high population validity
Which is when the results can be successfully generalised to the target population, increasing the external validity of research
This is because an effort has been made to ensure the sample reflects the make-up of the target population, meaning the sample is likely to be highly representative
Stratified Sampling Strength LEB
Unlike opportunity sampling, where only those people who are availableat the time of studycan be selected, a strength of stratified sampling is that it has low experimenter bias,
Which is when the experimenter cannot show unintentional bias in the selection of participants, increasing the internal validity of research.
Although the experimenter identifies strata in the target population, he does not actively choose individuals, and participants are still selected in an unbiased manner.
Stratified Sampling limitation LPV
A limitation of stratified sampling is that it may not always generate a sample with high population validity,
Which is to the extent at which results can be successfully generalised to the target population.
Although the selection of participants reflects the known strata of the target population, the actual sample may still be biased if (by chance) only participants with an unknown characteristic are selected.
Stratified Sampling limitation IDA
A limitation of stratified sampling is that it is difficult and time consuming to achieve.
This is because it is challenging to fully identify the characteristics of the target population that are important to research.
For example, whilst some characteristics (like gender) are easy to identify, others (like IQ) are hidden and difficult to define and this method cannot be used to study behaviour where no list of the target population exists.
Systematic sampling
A sample generated by identifying a list of the entire target population before specifically selecting every nth participant.
For example, if there are 100 people in the target population and a sample of 20 is required, psychologists would select every 5th person from the list. (100÷20=5)
Systematic sampling strength HPV
Unlike opportunity sampling, where only those people who are available at the time of study can be selected, a strength of systematic sampling is that it can often generate a sample with high population validity.
Which is when the results can be successfully generalised to the target population, increasing the external validity of the research.
This is because the sample will show an unbiased representation of the target population, meaning the sample is likely to be highly representative.
Systematic sampling strength LEB
Unlike opportunity sampling, where only those people who are available at the time of study can be selected, a strength of systematic sampling is that it provides low experimenter bias.
Which is when the experimenter cannot show unintentional bias in the selection of participants, increasing the internal validity of research.
Although the experimenter identifies the nth person from the target population, he does not actively choose individuals, and participants are still selected in an unbiased manner.