S7- Health Promotion Flashcards

1
Q

Outline the parts of the socio-ecological model of prevention

A
  1. Individual: individual attitudes, beliefs, knowledge + behaviour
  2. Interpersonal: relationships, support groups, social networks, cultural context
  3. Institutions and organisations: schools, health care administration, business, faith based organisations,
  4. Community: between organisations and institutions
  5. Structures and systems: Federal state, local regulations, laws, built environment (public works, infrastructure etc)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is primordial prevention?

A
  • Concerned with avoiding the emergence and establishment of social, economic + cultural patterns of living that contribute to risk of disease
  • involved interventions that are applied at population level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Distinguish between the following and give examples;

a) Primary prevention
b) Secondary prevention
c) Tertiary prevention

A

a) - concerned with preventing the onset of pathological changes
- involves interventions that are applied before there is any pathology
- e.g. vaccination, smoking cessation, physical fitness and road safety

b) - concerned with detecting disease in earliest stage before symptoms and intervening to slow or stop its progression
- e.g. cervical screening + risk prediction

c) - concerned with arresting the progress of an established disease and to control its negative consequences
- e.g. lessen impairment + reccurence, reduce disability + handicap, minimise suffering, promote adjustment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

a) What is health promotion?
b) What are the two approaches of health promotion?
C) pros and cons?

A

a) The process of enabling people to increase control over, and to improve, their health
b) 1. Universal approach: aim to reduce risk across whole population e.g. sugar tax
2. Targeted approach: aims identify those most at risk and then tailor messages and approaches to that group e.g. breast feeding initiatives in young mums

c)
1. Universal
- big impact if there is a common risk factor
- harm paradox is an issue: affects percieved credibility

  1. targeted
    - can be tailored to need and to specific communities
    - but it can assume that groups are homogenous, can lead to culture blaming and broader health issues might be neglected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 3 levels of strategies for health promotion?

A
  1. Policy, legislation and systems change
  2. Community development
  3. Health communication: information communication and health education
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are some of the policy, legislation and system health promotion strategies?

A
  • Social policy: local, national or international culture and policy e.g. smoking ban in public places
  • Fiscal approaches: taxation or other approaches to discourage health harming behaviours e.g. tax on cigarettes
  • Bans and restrictions: reducing availability, using legal powers e.g. illicit substances, restricting sales of alcohol and cigs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are some of the community development health promotion strategies?

A
  • Community participation and action
  • Facilitation: statutory services support community activites e.g. space for meetings
  • Interface: statutory services working with communities e.g. consultation with faith leaders
  • Strategy: strategic support from local or national initatives e.g. national funding streams
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are some of the health communication promotion strategies?

A
  • For health information to be understood it needs to be: received, understood, change attitudes and beliefs and stimulate behavioural change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some of the problems with health promotion activities?

A
  • Are we allowed to intervene in peoples lives?
  • Health promotion often focuses on individual behavioural change and doesn’t factor in wider socioeconomic + environmental determinants e.g. housing conditions
  • fallacy of empowerment: information doesn’t give people power to act on healthier choices
  • can reinforce negative stereotypes associated with a condition or group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the prevention paradox?

A
  • interventions that make a difference at population level might not have much effect on the individual
  • there are lay beliefs associated with this: if people dont see themselves as a candidate for a disease then they may not take onboard health promotion messages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why do we need to evaluate health promotion?

A
  • need for evidence-based interventions
  • properly conducted evaluated studies provide evidence
  • accountability
  • gives legitimacy to interventions
  • ethical obligation
  • ensure there is no direct or indirect harm
  • management and development
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 3 types of health promotion evaluations?

A
  1. Process evaluation:
    - focusses on assessing the process of programme implementation
    - formative/illuminative
    - employs mainly qualitative methods
  2. Impact evaluation:
    - assesses the immediate effects of the intervention
    - more popular, as easiest
  3. Outcome evaluation:
    - measures long term consequences
    - measures what is achieved e.g. improvement, reduction of symptoms, level of harm reduction
    - timing can influence outcome i.e. some interventions may take a long time to have an effect and decay- some interventions wear off rapidly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are some of the difficulties associated with evaluation?

A
  • demonstrating an attributable effect is difficult because:
  • design of the intervention
  • possible lag time to effect
  • many potential intervening or concurrent confounding factors
  • high cost of evaluation research
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly