Royal Supremacy and Reformation Flashcards
What are the four main historical interpretations of the Henrician Reformation?
The four main interpretations are rapid reform from above, rapid reform from below, slow reform from below and slow reform from above
What must be remembered about the term ‘Reformation’?
‘Reformation’ in England wasn’t a specific event, and ‘reformation’ is a historians term
What are the three points of contention in regards to studying the early reformation?
The motive and pace; was it advanced via official coercion or horizontal expansion; was it powerful by 1553 or an Elizabethan job
What is the main criticism of pre-1980s historiography from C. Haigh?
C. Haigh criticises traditional and revisionist historiography because it is written as a history of English Protestantism rather than the reformation - making it appear as inevitable
What are two smaller criticisms from C. Haigh of pre-1980s historiography?
C. Haigh criticises that there is little clarity of whether it was a centre or periphery action, nor clarity of the motivations of Elizabeth’s settlement
Who is the doyen for the rapid reformation from above interpretation?
G. Elton trailblazer the rapid reformation from above interpretation
Who is the doyen for the rapid reformation from below interpretation?
A. Dickens is the leading historian for the rapid reformation from below interpretation
Who is the doyen for the slow reformation from above interpretation?
P. Williams dominates the slow reformation from above interpretation?
Who is the doyen for the slow reformation from below interpretation?
P. Collinson is the central historian for the slow reformation from below interpretation
Briefly outline G. Elton’s interpretation of the reformation:
G. Elton thought the reformation to be part of Cromwell’s arsenal which by 1553 had made England the most Protestant country in Europe
Who is a supporting study for the historical interpretation of rapid reformation from above?
P. Clarke: he studied Kent local politics and administration (e.g. wills) and found the 1540s to be a breakthrough
What is an issue with the interpretation being rapid from above?
Interpreting the reformation as rapid from above does not interrogate the extent to which reforms were accepted at a local level
Briefly outline A. Dickens’s interpretation of the reformation:
A. Dickens stresses religious rather than political roots of the reformation and said that there was a clear need for personal religious involvement to increase
What is an example of an English religious root of the Reformation?
Lollardy- a 14th century christian reform movement- was said to act as a foundation for the Reformation
How can we criticise A. Dickens’s interpretation of rapid reformation from below?
Rapid reformation from below does not show the general pace because it concentrates on atypical heretics, and suggests Catholic institutions to be insufficient for the public
What is a post-1980s change in ideas of reformation from below?
reformation from below now acknowledges the social use of magic and communal rituals in parish needs
What is a contemporary source which undermines the interpretation of the reformation being rapid from below?
Late-Elizabethan Kentish preacher Josias Nicholas examined 400 parishioners and found only 40 understood basic doctrine, only 4 believed justification by faith
What must be considered about variations in the permeance of the English Reformation?
A rapid reformation cannot be said to have occurred in urban AND rural England equally- assimilation was usually dependent on special circumstances such as trade links to Protestants on the continent
Briefly outline P. Williams’s interpretation of the reformation developing slowly from above:
P. Williams suggests that the Reformation had more impact on law than on parishes, that there was hostility to change until the brutal suppression of the 1549 Western Rebellion, and that there was no major Protestantism until a 1570s coup
How can P. Williams’s interpretation be shortened?
P. Williams believes that there was hardly any reformation of religious practice in England until 1559
How can P. Williams’s 1570s political coup for the Protestant cause be exemplified?
The idea of a 1570s coup can be seen in the 1568 purge of the Lancashire Ecclesiastic Commission and the death of the conservative EoDerby 1572
Briefly outline P. Collinson’s interpretation of reformation developing slowly from below:
For P. Collinson, Elizabethan puritanism = the evangelical phase of English protestantism where radical preachers helped spread Protestantism through the parishes
Who is a supporting historian for the interpretation of reformation developing slowly from below?
M. Spufford: studied Cambridgeshire and found most parishes had little Protestant presence until 1560s and little enthusiasm until 1590s
What is the issue with “rapid” and “slow” interpretations of the English reformation’s development?
while rapid interpretations too easily interpret an absence of opposition to be a presence of support, slow interpretations suggest lacking records of heresy to indicate no protestant presence