Retrocochlear Assessment: Stacked ABR Flashcards
Describe the standard ABR test for acoustic tumor detection.
- IT5: Interaural time delay for wave V
- I-V Delay: Latency difference between waves I and V
- Detects nearly all medium and large acoustic tumors
- BUT, misses 30-50% of small (<1 cm) acoustic tumors
What did Eggermont et al. (1980) state about the standard ABR test for acoustic tumor detection?
-“ABR yields high detection scores: up to 90% The larger the tumor, the easier its detection. It is likely that small tumors (<1 cm) will be missed.”
What are the consequences of failure to detect small tumors?
-All patients with suspicious clinical hearing and balance symptoms are sent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
What are drawbacks of MRI screening for acoustic tumor detection?
- Relatively expensive ($2,100)
- Not available everywhere
- Invasive, anxiety-producing, and uncomfortable test for some patients
- Cannot be sued on patients with implanted metal devices or materials
- Most patients tested do not have a tumor
Why do standard ABR measures often fail to detect small tumors?
- Small tumors exert less pressure and affect a smaller number of neural fibers than larger tumors
- Small tumors may not exert enough pressure to cause clinical symptoms
- Therefore, ABR measures often fail to detect small tumors because these measures are dominated by activity from a subset of CN VIII ANFs that may not be affected by the small tumor
Why is wave V latency dominated by HF ANFs in the standard ABR?
- LF contributions are phase-cancelled
- A tumor in the LF regions likely will yield normal standard ABR measures (wave V latency)
- Will be missed
What is the rationale behind the stacked ABR?
- If we divide the whole auditory nerve into 5 groups, could use the activity from the groups for a new ABR measure
- 5 groups could represent frequency regions of the cochlea that span the whole frequency range of the whole ANF
- Presence of a tumor would reduce contributions from affected groups in the AN (abnormal ABR measures)
- Because this new measure involves contributions from essentially all nerve fibers, it doesn’t matter where the tumor is located or which fibers are affected as long as there has been compromise of a sufficient number of ANFs
What stimuli are used in the stacked ABR?
- WB clicks
- HP masking noise (varied cutoff frequencies)
- Lowering the HP cutoff results in more masking, allowing for isolation of the AN region to be tested
- As more masking is added, stacked ABR responses will reflect activity from lower and lower frequency regions of the cochlea (peak activity in each response will be delayed in time due to the TW delay down the cochlea)
- Results in derive-band ABRs
What do derive-band ABRs result in?
- Neural contributions from different frequency regions of the cochlea
- Adding all derived band ABR waveforms essentially yields the standard ABR response
What is the Stacking Technique?
- The stacked ABR is formed by first temporarily aligning wave V of the derived-band ABRs, then summing the response
- Aligning the derived-band ABRs eliminated the phase cancellation of LF activity
- Thus, the stacked ABR amplitude reflects activity from all frequency regions of the cochlea, not just the HFs
- Reduction of any neural activity due to a tumor, even a small tumor, will result in a reduction of the stacked ABR amplitude
How can physiological noise be minimized in the ABR?
- Physiological noise needs to be sufficiently minimized or the results will be difficult to interpret
- Estimation of un-averaged noise in a block of sweeps in a derived-band
- Weighted averaging for all blocks of sweeps in a derived-band (Bayesian weighting)
- Termination of averaging when residual noise level is low (20 nV)
What is Bayesian weighting?
-Those blocks of sweeps that have the lowest physiological noise are given the greatest weight in the average
Compare specificity between the standard and stacked ABR.
STANDARD ABR (IT5 and I-V Delay)
- Specificity: <5%
- Sensitivity: 95%
STACKED ABR
-Specificity: 83%
What is the stacked ABR better at doing better than the standard ABR?
- Detecting small tumors
- Decreasing the number of misdiagnosed non-tumor patients (i.e. decreasing the number of false positives referred for MRI)