Restorative justice Flashcards
Definition
Ministry of Justice
bringing together those harmed by crime with those responsible for the harm, to find a positive way forward
what are 3 definition issues with restorative justice
there are many definitions: which is going to give the best information and not scare people away
what is the underlying theme? those who are affected and a solution need to be in the centre
no single theory so results are varied
what are the 6 key aspects of restorative justice
empowerment dialogue negotiation agreement professionals not dominant stakeholders dominant
key aspects
empowerment
takes power away from offending and gives to offender
key aspects
dialogue
direct or not
direct-exact words spoken
not-a summary of words spoken
key aspects
negotiation
deciding what to do
key aspects
agreement
the way forward, using negotiation
3 Modes of restoratve justice
purist
maximalist
encounter/reparative/transformative
purist model
concentrates on the practices in which people affected communicate
try to resolve the issues raised by the wrongful act
stakeholder empowerment is important
what is an advantage of the purist model
needs full voluntary agreement
what is a disadvantage of the purist model
no punishment or treatment options
maximalist model
focused on repairing the harm cause by crime and by doing this, doing justice
encounter/reparative/transformative
encounter- between stakeholders in a conflict in order to discuss the problems and what to do
reparative-offender does not need to experience pain in proportion to the seriousness of the offence, how can they repair?
transformative- ultimate goal for RJ is to transform the way in which we understand ourselves
This model suggests all 3 are important
theoretical foundations
reintegrative shaming offence condemned-not offender shame of people reintegration is key respect the shamer does not acknowledge structural changes of crime RJ gives greater opportunities to reduce re-offending Legitimate stake
theoretical foundations
reintegrative shaming
shaming offenders but then allowing them back into society after, they will no longer be seen as an offender. This is opposed to disintegrated shaming in which after offender gets shamed, they are not returned into society