Responsibility of Partners, Managers, and Supervisory Atty Flashcards
The partners or managing lawyers of a law firm (and the supervisory lawyers in a governmental agency, business, or other group of lawyers) ____ make ______________ efforts to assure
that the other lawyers adhere to the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Must
Reasonable
A lawyer who directly supervises the work of another ____ make ______________ efforts to assure
that the other lawyers adhere to the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Must
Reasonable
True or False: The duty to manage may be expanded depending on the size of the organization.
True - Larger firms may require more complex steps.
When is a lawyer subject to discipline for the misconduct of another lawyer?
- When the lawyer ordered the misconduct.
- When the lawyer knew about it or ratified it.
- When the lawyer knew about it and failed to take reasonable remedial action when they could have.
True or False: lawyer must instruct non lawyers about the ethics of the profession and be ultimately responsible for their work.
True
Lawyer L hired secretary S without carefully checking her background. L put S in charge of
his client trust fund account, but did not carefully supervise her bookkeeping procedures. S
stole a substantial sum from the account. L failed to fire S even after he discovered her theft.
What is the rule?
Lawyer is subject to discipline for gross negligence.
When is a lawyer liable for the conduct of non-lawyers?
- When the lawyer ordered the conduct or knew about it or ratified it.
- The lawyer is a partner/manager/supervisor over non lawyer and knows of the misconduct and did not take reasonable remedial action when they could have.
True or False: Supervisory lawyers have the same ethical duties as a partner to subordinates.
True
What does it mean for someone to be vicariously responsible?
They ordered or ratified the misconduct
or
Failed to avoid or mitigate consequences.
True or False: Partners/Supervisors do not have the same duties of supervision over nonlawyers (both inside and outside the firm)
False - they do both to firm staff and 3rd parties hired by the firm.
When does acting under the orders of another excuse misconduct?
When the action was a reasonable resolution of an arguable question of professional duty. (very technical argument)