Respondent Conditioning Flashcards
1
Q
Whats the difference between respondent and operant conditioning?
A
- Respondent is a response we cant control, you use associations. Based on survival instincts (usually)
Elicit physiological responses - Operant is where a stimulus indicate a specific behaviour depending on the context
It can start as a respondent conditioning - emotional responses are common- and be maintained by operant conditioning - Two-factor theory
2
Q
Unconditioned stimulus
A
- Naturally evokes an unconditioned response
- No pairing
- Full bladder
- Food
3
Q
Neutral stimulus
A
- Does not elicit any particular response
- Door
- Bell
4
Q
Unconditioned response
A
- Comes as a natural consequence of an unconditioned stimulus
- Need to pee
- Drooling/ Salivating
5
Q
Conditioned response
A
- Comes as a result of conditioned stimulus after pairing
- Door + bladder = need to be(during conditioning)
- Bell + Food= drooling/salivating(during conditioning)
6
Q
What was Albert example about?
A
- Focused on classical conditioning to condition an emotional response
- Albert was exposed to stimuli
- White rat pair with loud noise
- Albert conditioned to fear white rat
- Stimulus generalization
Other example - Sushi
- Anxious + bed
7
Q
Higher order conditioning
A
- Establishing a conditioned stimulus
- by pairing a neutral stimulus
- with an already established stimulus
Food = Salivation
Food + Opening can = Salivation
Open cabinet + Opening can = Salivation
Open cabinet = Salivation
8
Q
How many pairings are needed for conditioning?
A
- It depends on preparedness
Biological sensitivity
How easily a person associates CS with US - Previous learning and blocking effect after learning
Info in the CS about the US
Blocking - one pairing already exists ( 2 CS with 1 US) - How salient the US is (air puff vs stabbing)
- Strength of the UR (slightly increased HR vs terrified)
- How salient CS is (weak vs loud sound)
9
Q
Fear learning
A
- We look for problems
- We are more prepared to make logical connections
taste - nausea - We learn more easily to be afraid of specific stimuli
Animals - crawling ones
Threatening/angry people - Social fear learning
Fear learning is influenced by social group affiliation, close groups or similar groups
Observational learning of threat value
10
Q
Safety signals
A
- They predict the absence of the US (no longer scared)
- Disruption of extinction when safety signals are present when CS no longer paired with US
- Undermine effect of treatment involving extinction
11
Q
Respondent Extinction
A
- Continuously getting exposure without the response that created the association
- No longer presenting food when opening cabinet
12
Q
Systematic Desensitization
A
- Combining relaxing with
- hierarchy of fear producing stimuli,
- arranged from the least to the most frightening
- Used for phobia treatment
- Good as reinforcer
- In vivo - closer and closer to phobia
- Imagination