research planning and design lecture 2 Flashcards

1
Q

main goals and features of experiments

A
  • establish a causual relationship between variables
  • measure the effect of one variable on another via manipulation
  • must involve the active intervention of the researcher
  • controlled environment
  • control of extraneous variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

systematic manipulation

A

deliberate and controlled alteration of one or more variables in an experiment to observe its effect on other variables.
- changing the level/ condition of independent variable systematically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

single factor two level design

A

= one independent variable, two levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

single factor multi level design

A

= one independent variable, more than two levels

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

within subject design/ repeated measures design

A

= all participants are exposed to all levels/ conditions of the IV at different times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

between subject design/ independent design

A

= different participants are exposed to different levels of the IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

extraneous variables

A

= any other variable apart from the IV and DV that could affect your outcome
- if it is not controlled can become a confounding variable
- example, age, time of testing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

confounding variables

A

= a extraneous variable that varies systematically across levels of IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Random assignment + block randomisation

way to control for confounding variables

A

1.) each participant has the same chance of being assigned to each condition, assignment of each participant is independent of all the others.
2.all the conditions occur once in the sequence before any of them is repeated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

benefits of within-subject design

A
  • maximum control of extraneous variables
  • more powerful
  • smaller sample size needed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

disadvantages of within subject design

A
  • not practical with all designs
  • carryover effects (repeated practice, fatigue, order effects) -> solution to this is counterbalancing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

benefits and cost of between subject design

A
  • no carryover effects
  • independent scores
  • less time per participant
  • practical for designs where its not possible to have participants in more than one condition
  • needs a larger sample size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

counterbalancing

A

complete counterbalancing = equal number of participants complete each possible order of conditions -> might not be possible with large number of conditions (lots of different orders)

random counterbalancing = randomly assorted, not paying attention to how many people in each group

latin square = each condition appears exactly once in each position, means that each condition has an equal chance of being experienced in every position -> allows for fewer participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

randomised control trial

A

= experiments done in the field to investigate the effectiveness of a treatment/ intervention
- only difference we should be able to see is the outcome of the variable being studied

placebo effect solution > double/ single blind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

internal validity

A
  • ## tests if we can we confidently infer a causal relationship between variables without the influence of other factors or variables.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

external validity

A

= the degree to which we can generalise the findings to other people, times or settings - real world environment

  • mundane realism = when the participants and the situation studied are similar to those that the researcher wants to generalise to

-psychological realism = same mental processes used in lab and real world

17
Q
A