Research Methods Ao3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Types of observations Ao3 controlled STRENGTH

A

P-⬆️ reliability
E-environment controlled (context -what is controlled )
E -easily repeated- check for consistent results
L-more respected by public and professionals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of observations Ao3 controlled WEAKNESS 1 and 2

A

P-low in eco val
E- controlled setting (not reflect real life)
E-difficult to generalise findings past research setting
L- ⬇️ external validity

Peel 2
P- prone to demand characteristics (ppts⬆️10 yrs)
E-ppts know watched (CONTEXT )
E-pick up clues from researcher
L-change natural behaviour to help/hinder research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of observations Ao3 Naturalistic STRENGTHS P1 and2

A

P-less prone to demand characteristics
E-ppts may not be aware they are being studied (CONTEXT - environment )
E-less likely to pick up on clues given by researcher and change natural behaviour (help/hinder)
L-⬆️ internal validity

P-⬆️ ecological validity
E-natural environment (CONTEXT )
E-easier to generalise results/findings (CONTEXT)
L-⬆️external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of observations Ao3 Naturalistic WEAKNESSES P1 and 2

A

P-low in reliability
E- natural environment (CONTEXT-what is not controlled )
E-difficult to repeat/check for consistent results
/achieve consistent results

P- ethical issues- lack of informed consent
E-observed natural environment (CONTEXT )
E-difficult to generalise results/ findings (CONTEXT )
L-can’t give consent- found out may be upset and withdraw data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Types of observations Ao3 Overt STRENGTH

A

P-more ethically appropriate than covert
E-ppts aware they’re being studied (CONTEXT)
E- therefore can give consent for data used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of observations Ao3 Overt WEAKNESS

A

P-prone to demand characteristics
E-ppt know being observed (CONTEXT )
E- pick up clues researcher/environment and change natural behaviour to help/ hinder the research
L- ⬇️ internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Types of observations Ao3 Covert STRENGTH

A

P-less prone to demand characteristics
E-ppts unaware being observed
E-less likely to pick up on clues from researcher and change natural behaviour help/hinder the research
L-⬆️ internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Types of observations Ao3 Covert WEAKNESS

A

P-ethical issues
E- lack of informed consent and invasion of privacy
E-ppts not aware being observed- can’t consent
L- if find out may be upset and withdraw data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Types of observations Ao3 Participant STRENGTH

A

P- researcher gain in depth understanding of behaviour
E-member of group
E-won’t miss feeling s/motivations (CONTEXT)
L-⬆️ internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Types of observations Ao3 Participant WEAKNESS

A

P-⬆️chance of researcher bias
E- researcher part of group- (CONTEXT ) ⬇️objectivity
E-researchers own thoughts and feelings may effect
L-⬇️ internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of observations Ao3 NON- Participant STRENGTH

A

P-⬇️researcher bias
E-observer not part of group (CONTEXT )
E⬆️objectivity (as feelings and thoughts don’t affect the observation)
L-⬆️internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of observations Ao3 NON- Participant WEAKNESS

A

P-less in depth understanding of behaviour
E- observer not a part of group (CONTEXT )
E-miss important aspects (feelings and motivations)
L- ⬇️ internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Behaviour sampling in observations Ao3 Event sampling strength

A

P-useful for behaviour that is infrequent
E-ppt recorded over a set time period and behaviour is recorded every time (context)
E-researchers less likely miss important behaviour (context)
L-unlike time sampling- only tallies@ time intervals- doesn’t occur frequently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Behaviour sampling in observations Ao3 Event sampling WEAKNESS

A

P- limitation if behaviour is complex/happens often
E- some behaviours may be missed(context)
E- as they cannot tally in time
L-unlike TS researcher only tallies in set intervals - less likely to miss these behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Behaviour sampling in observations Ao3 Time sampling STRENGTH

A

P-⬇️ amount of time observers observe (context)
E-observe in time intervals
E-as ONLY observing @ set intervals
L-behaviours tallied (context) may not be representative of observation as a whole.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Questionnaires AO3 STRENGTH

A

P- can tackle sensitive issues (CONTEXT)
E-as ppts anonymous (not asking for names)
E- ppts answers ⬆️ honest- disclose sensitive info
L-⬆️ internal validity (unlike an interview….)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Questionnaires AO3 STRENGTH

A

P-⬇️ investigator effects
E-Researcher not have to be present
E-Researchers response to answers ❌👀
Characteristics not influence ppts answers
L-unlike in an interview…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Questionnaires AO3 STRENGTH

A

P-given to a ⬆️er number of people- researcher ❌present
E-⬆️ generalisability of findings
E-unlike in an interview… Researcher must present
L- ⬆️ external validity

19
Q

Questionnaires AO3 WEAKNESS

A

P- lead- social desirability bias
E- may lie present best light (CONTEXT )
E-eg: mum lie child aggressive
L-⬇️internal validity
C- whereas in interview……

20
Q

Questionnaires AO3 WEAKNESS

A

P-misinterpretation of Qs
E-not understand - researcher ❌ present - ❌clarification
E- researcher may misunderstand ppts answers
L-⬇️ internal validity
C- unlike in an interview …..

21
Q

Types of questions in QUESTIONNAIRES STRENGTH OPEN

A

P-in depth
E-rich detailed
E-provides greater understanding of behaviour (CONTEXT )

22
Q

Types of questions in QUESTIONNAIRES WEAKNESS OPEN

A

P-researcher bias
E-ppts responses (context)
E-open to subjective interpretation of researcher

23
Q

Types of questions in QUESTIONNAIRES STRENGTH CLOSED

A

P-easier analyse and collate data
E-comparisons in groups
E-enabling conclusions about behaviour

24
Q

Types of questions in QUESTIONNAIRES WEAKNESS CLOSED 1

A

P- lacks depth and insight
E-answers could ⬇️ validity

25
Q

Types of questions in QUESTIONNAIRES WEAKNESS CLOSED 2

A

P-open to response bias
E-ppts reply in similar way
E-eg ticking yes/ rating favourable end scale
L-⬇️ internal validity

26
Q

Structured interviews AO3 STRENGTH

A
  • All ppts asked same questions
  • easier to compare responses identify trends and patterns (CONTEXT )
  • unlike unstructured- interview ppts are asked different questions- difficult to compare
27
Q

Structured interviews AO3 WEAKNESS

A

P- researcher cannot follow up deeply lines of enquiry
E-ppts set questions (cannot deviate )
E-ppts cannot explain further
L-researcher cannot develop a deeper understanding of behaviour (CONTEXT )
L- unlike unstructured-Q developed based on previous responses

28
Q

UnStructured interviews AO3 STRENGTH

A

P- ppts can go in more depth with responses as questions are based on responses
E- fuller understanding behaviour (Context )
E-unlike structured - set questions (no deviation )
L- ⬆️internal validity

29
Q

UnStructured interviews AO3 WEAKNESS 1

A

P-ppts not all asked same questions (Context)
E- harder to compare and spot patterns
E- harder to analyse
L- unlike structured -set questions- easier comparison- all answer same questions

30
Q

UnStructured interviews AO3 WEAKNESS 2

A

P-harder to repeat
E-each ppt is asked different questions (context)
E-unlike structured - set questions-standardised- can be repeated
L-⬇️ credibility

31
Q

UnStructured interviews AO3 WEAKNESS 2

A

P-harder to repeat
E-each ppt is asked different questions (context)
E-unlike structured - set questions-standardised- can be repeated
L-⬇️ credibility

32
Q

Overall AO3 Interviews WEAKNESS

A

P- interviews more time consuming and expensive
E-have to be carried out face to face
E- unlike questionnaires which can be handed out to many ppts

33
Q

Overall AO3 Interviews WEAKNESS

A

P- interviews more time consuming and expensive
E-have to be carried out face to face
E- unlike questionnaires which can be handed out to many ppts

34
Q

Overall AO3 Interviews WEAKNESS

A

P- prone to investigator effects
E-researcher present - behaviours(CONTEXT )/ appearance (CONTEXT)
E-unlike questionnaire Researcher not need to be present ⬇️ investigator effects

35
Q

Overall AO3 Interviews STRENGTH

A

P- researcher present - ppts can ask clarification- don’t understand a question
E- researcher can ask for clarification about responses
E- ⬆️ internal validity
L- unlike questionnaires- no clarification- ⬇️ internal validity

36
Q

Overall AO3 Interviews STRENGTH

A

P- researcher present - ppts can ask clarification- don’t understand a question
E- researcher can ask for clarification about responses
E- ⬆️ internal validity
L- unlike questionnaires- no clarification- ⬇️ internal validity

37
Q

Correlational analysis AO3- STRENGTH 1

A

P- no manipulation of variables
E- appropriate studying sensitive issues- inappropriate to manipulate
E- (CONTEXT- what can’t be manipulated )
L-unlike experiment- unethical/ impractical to manipulate cause and effect

38
Q

Correlational analysis AO3- STRENGTH 2

A

P-correlations- starting points access possible patterns
E- relationship- may predict IV may impact on other
E- aid further experimental research
Save time/ money if ❌relationship before researchers commit

39
Q

Correlational analysis AO3- WEAKNESS 1

A

P-difficult to establish cause and effect
E- only relationship (CONTEXT CO-Vs)
E-extraneous variables- may be responsible (CONTEXT EVs)
L-⬇️ internal validity

40
Q

Correlational analysis AO3- WEAKNESS 2

A

P-correlations - mis interpreted - media + society
Link two variables
E- assume conclusion- causes for relationship
E- may be misused - support/ contradict an argument

41
Q

Maternal Deprivation AO3 STRENGTH

A

P-RTS-Bowlbys- 44 juvenile thieves
E-interviewed thieves- Affection-less psychopathy interviewed parents- prolonged separation
E-AP- likely long separation in CP
L- supports- early separation-> negative consequences

42
Q

Maternal Deprivation AO3 WEAKNESS 1

A

P-44 JT based on retrospective data
E- memory parents separation in childhood
E- may lie - better lie/ forget
L- ⬇️ internal validity- limits support for MD

43
Q

Maternal Deprivation AO3 WEAKNESS 2

A

P- RTC- Lewis 1954
E- partially replicated 44 JT- 500 young people
E- prolonged separation ❌ predict criminality/ difficulty forming relationships
L- contradicts Bowlbys theory of maternal deprivation
TF- Bowlbys opportunity sample?