Memory AO3 Flashcards
AO3 msm (research studies)
P-strength supported by research studies, STM and LTM, separate unitary stores
E-baddley found STM mix up acoustically similar words and LTM mix up semantically similar
E-shows coding LTM semantic and coding STM – acoustic
L-support MSM – STM and LTM are separate stores
MSM AO3 rts strength
P-RTS Clive Wearing
E-amnesia info unable to pass STM to LTM
E-wife leaves the room and re-enters he greets her
L-support MSM – STM and LTM as separate unitary stores and that information flows in a linear way
D-low population validity one person, unusual illness
Difficult to generalise to wide population as memory may work differently
Limits support for MSM
MSM AO3 weakness
P-too simplistic, STM and LTM unitary stores
E-e.g. shallice and Warrington’s research , STM patient KF
E- found very poor recall when digits read aloud however better when seeing visually
L-different stores in LTM, visual and auditory, casting doubt on STM as unitary.
Overall AO3 for coding,capacity and duration studies (duration stm weakness)
P-lacks mundane realism
E-task(consonant trigram recall) artificial
E-not reflect meaningful real life memory
L-⬇️ external validity research into duration stm
TF- phone number,meaningful??
Overall AO3 for coding,capacity and duration studies (coding of LTM strength)
P-⬆️ control extraneous variables
E-controlled setting/lab(lists matched on difficulty and shown same time)
E-cause and effect IV(word lists) and DV (accurate recall)
L- ⬆️internal validity of coding stm
Overall AO3 for coding,capacity and duration studies (Capacity of stm Strength)
P- praised ⬆️reliability
E-controlled environment/lab
E- research can repeated same conditions
L- check for consistent results (CAP STM)
Overall AO3 for coding,capacity and duration studies (BAHRICK STRENGTH )
P-⬆️ mundane realism
E- real life memory classmates
E- everyday activity-friends socials
L-easier generalise finds real life apps
⬆️external validity
Overall AO3 for coding,capacity and duration studies (BAHRICK WEAKNESS )
P- critics-⬇️control extraneous variables
E-not controlled environment
E- eg- contact between classmates not controlled
L- cause and effect not clearly established no firm conclusions
⬇️internal validity
Types of LTM AO3 strength
P- neuroimaging evidence to support
E- ppts memory tasks PET scanners
E- brain areas active LTM tasks,procedural mc and cerebellum
L-different types of LTM different brain area
Types of LTM AO3 Strength
P-use of scientific methods
E- objective and empirical brain scans
E- parts of brain active memory tasks (procedural)
L- ⬆️ internal validity of research ⬆️psych’s scientific status
Types of LTM AO3 Strength REAL LIFE EVIDENCE
P-real life evidence Clive wearing
E- amnesia
E- damaged episodic- musical ed
Procedural intact- play piano
L- supports only 1 store damaged- must be separate
TF- virus damage hippocampus
D-low population validity- rare generalise
Working memory model AO3 strength RTS IMPORTANT FOR AO2
P-RTS dual task studies - separate components STM
E-Baddeley ppts ⬆️difficult 2 visual tasks than 1 visual and 1 acoustic
E-not competing same limited capacity- delegated to different slave systems
L-performance ⬇️
credibility ⬆️
Working memory model AO3 strength RTS KF
P-RTS case study Patient KF
E-Shallice and Warrington- KF amnesia
E-recall of digits poor (only read aloud ) better recall (when he could visually see them)
L- supports wmm - separate stores (acoustic and visual ) STM as PL was damaged but the VSS intact
CA- low population validity
Working memory model Weakness AO3
P-weakness,despite empirical RTS, focus on Slave systems, lack of clarity role of the CE
E- CE is a single component of attention- delegates to Slave systems
E-psychologists - several components
L-this casts doubt on STM as explanation of STM
Interference Theory (Forgetting)AO3 STRENGTH
P- RTS McGeoch + McDonald
E-list A (100%) list B(interference) List A
E- synonyms- 12%
not?- 26%
L-supports ⬆️similar, ⬆️ interference
TF- time periods?