Research Methods A Flashcards
Learn the content
Hypothesis
Derived from theories, they are testable predictions
Independent variable
A variable varied by the experimenter in order to examine the effects of the dependent variable (Is tested on)
Dependent variable
A variable liable to be influenced by the independent variable (what is measured in the experiment)
Which is independent and dependent variable?…
“Eating carrots improves eyesight”
Independent: Eating carrots
Dependent: Eyesight
Three problems with research
Can be bias
Can breach ethics
Confounding variables
Confounding variable
An extraneous variable that has interfered with the results of the experiment
Three ways to avoid bias in an experiment
Single blind study
Double blind study
Use a placebo for a group
Single blind study
The participants are kept in the dark about specific elements of the study
Double blind study
The participants and the researcher conducting the experiment are kept in the dark about specific elements of the study
What Clever Hans tells us about bias
That it is better to conduct a double blind study so the examiner can’t give unconscious physical clues as to the correct or preferred answer
Reactivity
When the knowledge that a participants is being observed or measured influences their behaviour
Three types of research methods
Non-experimental
Experimental
Quasi - experimental
Four types of non-experimental research
Observational
Case study
Survey
Correlational research
Difference between non-experimental and experimental research
Non-experimental research is descriptive whereas experimental is explanative and contains control factors
How are observational experiments carried out?
Mainly through categorization with as little disturbance as possible
Example of observational experiment
Eibl-Eibesfeldt’s cross-cultural eyebrow raising during greeting observations
Two problems of observable methods
and how they are solved
-Reliability of categorisation (due to subjectivity)
Solved by comparison with other researchers
Reactivity of subjects
Solved with observers undercover as participants
How are case studies carried out?
Observation of a single person or particular group, often with a unique quality
Three problems with case studies
Generalisations
Reproducibility
Lack of cause and effect understanding
A solution to the problems with case studies
Deviant case analysis: create a situation similar to the case study with a distinct difference to work out the cause effect relationship
Three types of surveys
Questionnaire
Interview
Diary study
Four problems with surveys
Reactivity
Validity of questionnaire
How to quantify
Participant’s memory
Benefits of a structured interview (three)
Easily quantified
Comparable across participants
All topics covered
Three costs of a structured interview
Rigid structure Not personally adaptable Surface information (can't probe deeper depending on participants answers)
Two benefits of an unstructured interview
More in-depth information
Personalised to participant
Two costs of an unstructured interview
Generalisability
Analysis can be time consuming (especially for big groups)
Purpose of correlational research
Determine the relationship between two variables without manipulation
Problems with correlational research (four)
Confounding variables (secondary causes etc)
Can often be unclear
Can be coincidental
Correlation is not proof of any causation
What is an experiment?
Manipulate the independent variable to test the effects on the dependent variable
Null hypothesis
The idea that there is no relationship, nothing happening in the study. Is always assumed while conducting the study
Nuisance variable
Additional factor that may effect the dependent variable (the results)
How to stop nuisance variables turning into confounding variables
Either turn it into a control variable or intentionally make it another independent variable
Control variable
Variables kept the same or otherwise made sure to not interfere with the dependent variable
How to solve nuisance variables across participants (E.g. sex, age etc.)
Either separate systematically or spread randomly
Why including multiple independent variables in one experiment rather than multiple experiments is better (three)
More efficient
More control over nuisance variables
Can see the relationships of independent variables
How to carry out a multiple independent variable study
Make sure to include groups for each possible combination of independent variables
How to tell on a graph if there is interaction between independent variables or not
If there is an interaction, the lines for each independent variable wont be parallel, if there isn’t an interaction, they will be parallel.
The more unparalleled the lines the stronger the interaction
Common example of multiple dependent variables in an experiment
Speed and accuracy (has to be trade off)
Advantages of experiments (two)
Stronger test of causality
Possibility of a variety of manipulated controls
Disadvantages of experiments (three)
Unnatural setting/task causes more reactivity
Some phenomena cannot be studied this way (E.g. social interaction)
Ethical limitations
What happens to a nuisance variable when it is not dealt with by the experimenter?
Becomes a confounding variable
A within subject design experiment
All participants receive all levels of the independent variable
A between subject design experiment
Different groups of participants receive different levels of the independent variable
Between subject design advantages (3) and disadvantages (2)
Adv: No order effect, essential for some experiments, naïve participation
Disadv: Lots of participants, characteristics between groups may differ (can be solved)
Within subject design advantages (2) and disadvantages (2)
Adv: Fewer participants, reduces individual differences
Disadv: Carryover effects (into next IV tested), order effects
How to counteract order effects in within subject design experiments
Randomise, or better: The Latin Square Design… make each order occur equally often (cant have too many variables though!)
Quasi experiment (and example)
When one (or more) independent variables are selected - not manipulated
Eg) Education relation to memory
IV: university degree YES/NO
DV: score in memory test
Advantage and disadvantage of Quasi experiment
Adv: Can examine otherwise unethical variables (as no manipulation)
Disadv: Possibility of confounding variable means no strong causal conclusions
Three types of sample
Random
Stratified
Quota
A random sample
Everybody in cohort has an equal chance of being selected
Why is random sampling particularly difficult
Always depends where you are to select people (choosing people ‘at random’ outside tennis court would be opportunity sampling)
Stratified sample
Random selection of each subgroup of the population/cohort