Research Methods Flashcards
(123 cards)
define “observation”
a non-experimental technique, the researcher watches and records spontaneous/ natural behaviour of ppt. without manipulating levels of IV
define “controlled observation”
aspects of the environment are controlled, in an attempt to give ppt. the same experience. This is often conducted in a laboratory setting.
give a strength for controlled observations
controlling the environment and giving the same experience reduces the likelihood that extraneous variables are responsible for observed behaviour
give a weakness for controlled observations
the artificiality of the observational environment may result in unnatural behaviour, not like behaviour shown in real-world situations.
define “naturalistic observation”
takes place in the “real world” places the ppt. are likely to spend their time such as school, work or in their homes.
give a strength for naturalistic observations
high realism, ppt. are more likely to show naturalistic behaviour.
external validity, behaviour is more likely to be generalisable to other situations.
give a weakness for naturalistic observations
uncontrolled extraneous variables may be responsible for the behaviour observed, resulting in lower internal validity
define “overt observation”
the ppt. can see the researcher, and are aware their behaviour is being observed as part of an observational study.
give a strength for overt observations
ethical, as the principle of informed consent means ppt. should agree to take part in research and they should know what they are signing up for.
give a weakness of overt observations
demand characteristics are likely, if the ppt. know they are being observed they may try to show behaviour that they think the researcher wants to see. or social desirability bias may be a factor, acting to “look cool”
define a covert observation
the ppt. are not aware they are being observed and they can’t see someone taking notes/recordings.
give a strength of covert observations
as ppt. are unaware they are being observed, they are far more likely to show naturalistic behaviour free from demand characteristics and social desirability bias.
define a participant observaiton
the researcher joins the group being observed and takes part in the group’s activities and conversations.
give a strength of participant observations
by taking part the researcher may build rapport, more trust and comfort could lead to the ppt. behaving more naturally and disclosing more.
give a weakness of participant observations
researchers can lose objectivity, interpretation of behaviour is biased, seeing only from the ppt. perspective. sometimes termed “going native”
define “non-participant observation”
the researcher is separate from the ppt recoding observations without taking part in the groups activities.
give a strength of non-participant observations
the researcher is more ;likely to remain objective in the interpretation of the ppt. behaviour
give a weakness of non-ppt. observations
due to lack of trust/rapport with the ppt. the researcher misses out on important insights/ppt don’t behave naturally.
define “operationalised”
clearly defining a variable
define “observational design”
the choice of behaviours to record and how they are measured
define “operationalised behavioural categories”
the behaviours need to be clearly identifiable and measurable. e.g= aggression= number of pushes, punches and kicks.
define “time sampling”
researcher records all relevant behaviour at set points. e.g everything for 15s, every 10 mins over a 1 hour observation.
define “event sampling”
researcher records/tallies every time a behaviour occurs from the list of operationalised behavioural categories.
strength for time sampling
more flexibility to be able to record unexpected types of behaviour