Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Psychology > Research Methods > Flashcards

Research Methods Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
AP® Psychology flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards
1
Q

define “observation”

A

a non-experimental technique, the researcher watches and records spontaneous/ natural behaviour of ppt. without manipulating levels of IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define “controlled observation”

A

aspects of the environment are controlled, in an attempt to give ppt. the same experience. This is often conducted in a laboratory setting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

give a strength for controlled observations

A

controlling the environment and giving the same experience reduces the likelihood that extraneous variables are responsible for observed behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

give a weakness for controlled observations

A

the artificiality of the observational environment may result in unnatural behaviour, not like behaviour shown in real-world situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define “naturalistic observation”

A

takes place in the “real world” places the ppt. are likely to spend their time such as school, work or in their homes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

give a strength for naturalistic observations

A

high realism, ppt. are more likely to show naturalistic behaviour.
external validity, behaviour is more likely to be generalisable to other situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

give a weakness for naturalistic observations

A

uncontrolled extraneous variables may be responsible for the behaviour observed, resulting in lower internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define “overt observation”

A

the ppt. can see the researcher, and are aware their behaviour is being observed as part of an observational study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

give a strength for overt observations

A

ethical, as the principle of informed consent means ppt. should agree to take part in research and they should know what they are signing up for.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

give a weakness of overt observations

A

demand characteristics are likely, if the ppt. know they are being observed they may try to show behaviour that they think the researcher wants to see. or social desirability bias may be a factor, acting to “look cool”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define a covert observation

A

the ppt. are not aware they are being observed and they can’t see someone taking notes/recordings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

give a strength of covert observations

A

as ppt. are unaware they are being observed, they are far more likely to show naturalistic behaviour free from demand characteristics and social desirability bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

define a participant observaiton

A

the researcher joins the group being observed and takes part in the group’s activities and conversations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

give a strength of participant observations

A

by taking part the researcher may build rapport, more trust and comfort could lead to the ppt. behaving more naturally and disclosing more.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

give a weakness of participant observations

A

researchers can lose objectivity, interpretation of behaviour is biased, seeing only from the ppt. perspective. sometimes termed “going native”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

define “non-participant observation”

A

the researcher is separate from the ppt recoding observations without taking part in the groups activities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

give a strength of non-participant observations

A

the researcher is more ;likely to remain objective in the interpretation of the ppt. behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

give a weakness of non-ppt. observations

A

due to lack of trust/rapport with the ppt. the researcher misses out on important insights/ppt don’t behave naturally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

define “operationalised”

A

clearly defining a variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

define “observational design”

A

the choice of behaviours to record and how they are measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

define “operationalised behavioural categories”

A

the behaviours need to be clearly identifiable and measurable. e.g= aggression= number of pushes, punches and kicks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

define “time sampling”

A

researcher records all relevant behaviour at set points. e.g everything for 15s, every 10 mins over a 1 hour observation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

define “event sampling”

A

researcher records/tallies every time a behaviour occurs from the list of operationalised behavioural categories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

strength for time sampling

A

more flexibility to be able to record unexpected types of behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

weakness for time sampling

A

can miss behaviour that happens outside of the recording periods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

define “assessing reliability” in relation to observations

A

even with clear behavioural categories interpreting observed behaviour can be affected by bias, researchers should assess the reliability of their own observation by seeing if it is consistent with another researcher’s observation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

define inter-observer/rater reliability

A

two or more observers conduct the same observation.
-agree and use the same checklist/tally of operationalised categories
-observation is conducted separately by each observer
-compare the two independently produced data sets. a test of correlation (e.g: spearman’s rho) can assess the strength of the relationship between two data sets. A correlation of 0.8 or stronger is generally accepted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

define “self-report techniques”

A

the ppt. reveals personal information about themselves (e.g, behaviours, emotions, beliefs, attitudes and memories) in response to a series of questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

define open questions

A

the ppt. can answer in any way they choose; what do you think about…
produces qualitative data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

define “closed questions”

A

the question is phrased in a way which limits ppt. responses. produces quantitative data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

give a strength for closed questions

A

quantitative data allows easy data analysis between large numbers of ppt. responses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

give a strength for open questions

A

as the ppt. have the freedom to choose their responses, this can be argues to lead to more valid responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

what is the difference between correlations and experiments

A

experimental designs require manipulation of the independent variable and a measurement of the resulting change in the dependent variable. In a correlational study, no variables are manipulated, two co-variables are measured and compared to look for a relationship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

define “co-variables”

A

the two factors/variables that are measured/ collected by the researcher and then compared to each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

define correlation coefficient

A

represents both the strength and direction of the relationship between the co-variables as a number between -1 and +1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

how are correlation coefficients calculated

A

using statistical tests. a correlation coefficient equal or greater than 0.8 is usually judged to show a strong correlation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

what is a weakness of correlations

A

correlation does not show causation. a correlation does not show which co-variable led to the change in the other co-variable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

define content analysis

A

an indirect observational method that is used to analyse human behaviour, investigating through studying human artefacts. content analysis is often on the written word (non-numerical/qualitative data) or write-ups of spoken words (transcripts). This is transformed into quantitative data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

how do you perform a content analysis

A

1)decide a research question
2)select a sample
3)coding
4)work through the data
5)data analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

define test-retest reliability

A

run the content analysis again on the same sample and compare the two sets of data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

define inter-rater reliability

A

a second rater also performs the content analysis with the same set of data and the sam behavioural categories. compare the two sets of data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

give a strength for content analysis

A

the “artefacts” are usually not created for research but are taken from the real world. this means content analysis has high external validity, and findings should be generalisable to other real-world situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

define thematic analysis

A

researchers start by attempting to identify the deeper meaning of the text by reading it first, and allowing themes to emerge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

how do you perform a thematic analysis

A

collect text/turn recordings into text
read text first to spot patterns
re-read text and look for emergent themes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

define case studies

A

range of data collected from an individual, group or institution. Mainly data is collected using interviews and observations, but content analysis can be performed on written evidence and even experimental techniques can be included.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

give examples of things case studies are usually conducted on

A

psychologically unusual individuals
unusual events
organisational practices
typical individuals within a demographic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

what is the main form of data collected from case studies

A

qualitative data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

what are snapshot case studies

A

case studies that look at behaviour over a short period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

what are longitudinal case studies

A

changes in the behaviour of ppt. over a long period of time (years)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

give examples of where case studies are used

A

in clinical psychology: Broca’s research on patient- Tan
in psychodynamic psychology: Freud’s research on Hanz
in childhood psychology: case study on Genie

51
Q

strength of case studies

A

the holistic approach of conducting research is favoured by humanist psychologists, arguing the depth of detail gives highly valid insights and are a true reflection of a person’s experience

52
Q

give a limitation of case studies

A

findings from one individual’s case cannot be generalised to wider populations.
also, exact replication of case studies is impossible.

53
Q

define the word “aim”

A

a clearly phrased general statement about what the investor intends to research.
can include the purpose of the study, for example, following on from findings of previous research to develop a theory

54
Q

what is a hypothesis

A

a precise testable statement including the levels of the independent variable and dependent variable (or both co-variables for a correlational study)

55
Q

define operationalisation in terms of hypothesis

A

operationalised variables are carefully stated, demonstrating exactly how they are to be measured for example the dependant variable would be the number of words recalled not “recall”, the independent variable would need to state both levels

56
Q

what is a null hypothesis

A

a null hypothesis states that there is no change in the measurement of the dependent variable as a result of the manipulation in the independent variable.

57
Q

what is an alternative hypothesis

A

also known as the research hypothesis, states that there is a change in the measurement of the dependent variable as a result of the manipulation in the independent variable.

58
Q

what is hypothesis testing

A

data is collected and statistical testing is conducted on the data. This provides evidence, if the evidence is strong enough the null hypothesis can be rejected and the alternate hypothesis is accepted.

59
Q

what is a non-directional hypothesis (two-tailed)

A

states that there is a difference in the measurement of the dependant variable (as a result of the manipulation of the IV) but not the direction the results will go

60
Q

what is a directional hypothesis (one-tailed)

A

states that there is a difference in the measurement of the dependant variable (as a result of the manipulation of the IV) and says which way the results will go

61
Q

what is falsifiability

A

the more a theory is able to withstand attempts to falsify it the greater the confidence we have in that theory but our confidence can never reach 100% certainty

62
Q

define “target population”

A

every member of the group that the investigator plans to study. As the target population could contain millions of people they can not all be studied.

63
Q

define random sampling

A

each member of the target population has a mathematically equal chance of being in experiment’s sample.

64
Q

how do you conduct random sampling

A

-the researcher needs a full list of the entire target population
-all names are entered into a container
-a number of names equal to the sample are pulled from the container
-the names are selected from the sample

65
Q

what is a strength of random sampling

A

-avoids researcher bias as the researcher cannot choose the ppt. they want to form a sample.

66
Q

what is a limitation of random sampling

A

-could result in an unrepresentative sample maybe not representing all minority groups
-time consuming.

67
Q

define systematic sampling

A

ppt. are chosen from a list of the target population. every nth ppt. is chosen to form the sample.

68
Q

how do you conduct systematic sampling

A

-full list of target population
-choose nth ppt.
-repeat process until sample is chosen

69
Q

strength of systematic sampling

A

reduces researcher bias

70
Q

weakness of systematic sampling

A

time consuming
may not be representative

71
Q

define opportunity sampling

A

the researcher directly asks available members of the target population to take part in the research.

72
Q

what is a weakness of opportunity sampling

A

-researcher bias
-sample may not be representative of whole target population

73
Q

what is volunteer sampling

A

also known as self-selecting sampling, ppt offer to take part after finding out about the research, most likely through adverts

74
Q

what is a weakness of volunteer sampling

A

-voluenter bias

75
Q

what is stratified sampling

A

by selecting from within strata, the characteristics of ppt. within the sample are in the same proportion as found within the target population.

76
Q

how do you conduct stratified sampling

A

1)strata/subgroups are identified along with their proportion in the target population (e.g, gender, ethnicity, education level)
2) random sampling is then used to select the number of ppt. required from each stratum.

77
Q

STRENGTH of stratified sampling

A

-representative sample
-no researcher bias

78
Q

weakness of stratified sampling

A

-time consuming
-researcher chooses strata so may lead to some bias

79
Q

what is the repeated measures design

A

the same ppt. complete two levels or more of the independent variable

80
Q

what is the independent groups design

A

different ppt. complete the two or more levels of the independent variable. ppt. are randomly allocated to each condition to avoid researcher bias

81
Q

what type of data does independent group designs produce

A

unrelated data.

82
Q

what is a weakness of independent group design

A

ppt. variables: if more ppt. with a particular characteristic are randomly allocated to one of the groups (e.g age) this can influence the measurement of the DV (an extraneous variable)

83
Q

what type of data does repeated measures design produce?

A

related data

84
Q

what is a weakness of the repeated measures design?

A

order effects: taking part in the first condition could influence performance in the second condition. ppt. are also more likely to figure out the aim of the study and alter their behaviour= demand characteristics

85
Q

how can you control order effects

A

by using counter balancing. ABBA, half the ppt. complete condition A first then B, others do B then A

86
Q

what is the matched pairs design

A

different ppt. complete in each of the two or more conditions of the experiment. Ppt. are first assessed and ranked on a characteristic (e.g aggression) and then the top two ppt. are randomly assigned to separate conditions.

87
Q

what are strengths of the matched pairs design

A

reduces ppt. variables
no order effects

88
Q

what are weaknesses of matched pairs design

A

time consuming
need more ppt
may be ppt. variables as ppt. are similar but not identical

89
Q

what variables are measured in a correlational study

A

co-variables. in a correlational study two measured co-variables are assessed for a relationship.

90
Q

what is an independent variable

A

the variables which the researcher manipulates

91
Q

what is a dependent variable

A

the thing which you measure

92
Q

what is an extraneous variable

A

any other variable which can influence the measurable dependant variable.

93
Q

what is a confounding variable

A

a variable other than the Independent variable that changes systematically between the levels of IV.

94
Q

what is a pilot study

A

a small-scale version of the main research study conducted before the main study.

95
Q

what are the aims of conducting pilot studies

A

-to improve the quality of the main research study by assessing the experience of the ppt. in the pilot. this is because pilot studies can reveal:
-unexpected extraneous variables that need to be controlled…

96
Q

what is informed consent in regards to ethical issues

A

consent is not valid if ppt. are not informed of what they are agreeing to. So before the research, ppt. should be made aware of the aims and consequences of taking part in research.

97
Q

define the “right to withdraw”

A

ppt. (as part of giving informed consent) should be told they can withdraw from the study at any stage with no adverse consequences (e.g; not being paid for their time). this includes withdrawing data from them.

98
Q

define confidentiality

A

ppt. personal data should be kept securely by the researcher, and not shared. when the research is published it should not include the identity of ppt. or information that could reveal the identity of ppt.

99
Q

define debriefing

A

once the research is complete, the researcher should offer a debriefing this would reveal any information withheld, such as the existence of other groups.

100
Q

define peer review

A

when before a publication in a journal, an author’s scientific paper is assessed by people who are experts in the same scientific area

101
Q

define reliability

A

saying results are reliable is another way of saying the results are consistent. if the researchers replicate their study exactly, they will get similar results.

102
Q

define external reliability

A

the extent to which a measure is consistent when repeated (e.g: the results of a study are consistent with an exact replication at a different time and/or with different ppt.)

103
Q

define internal reliability

A

the extent to which different parts of s measure are consistent with itself

104
Q

what method would you use to assess internal reliability

A

split half method.
-split test in two parts
-ppt. complete both parts
-test the strength of the correlation between the two parts of the measure
-a strong correlation indicates internal reliability

105
Q

what method would you use to assess external reliability

A

test-retest: repeat the study using the same procedures/measuring devices at different times and test the correlation between the two versions.

106
Q

how would you use inter-observer reliability to assess external reliability

A

two or more observers record behaviours during the same observation using the same behavioural categories; then, they test the correlation between each tally of behaviour to identify if the behavioural categories are appropriately operationalised.

107
Q

define internal validity

A

questions the cause and effect relationship between the change the researcher made to the independent variable IV and the observed change in the dependent variable DV. If the change in DV was influenced by ANY OTHER FACTOR than the IV, the findings lack internal validity.

108
Q

define external validity

A

questions if a study’s findings can be generalised beyond the study. So from the sample used to the target population and from the experimental set up to other “real world” settings and activities.

109
Q

define social desirability bias

A

ppt. hide their genuine opinions/behaviours and instead act/respond in a more socially acceptable way to ‘look good’.

110
Q

define mundane realism

A

the extent to which the task/materials/activities used in an experimental set-up are similar to the stimuli experienced in the real world.

111
Q

define population validity

A

the extent to which the sample used in the study is representative of the target population.

112
Q

define temporal validity

A

the extent to which the findings of a study can be generalised to other time periods. Generally asked for older studies.

113
Q

define face validity

A

does the test appear to measure what it claims to be measuring?

114
Q

define concurrent validity

A

the extent to which data from the newly created test is similar to an established test of the same variable conducted at the same time. A test of correlation assesses this; there is high concurrent validity if the strength of the correlation is +0.8 or higher.

115
Q

what is the empirical method

A

the process of collecting data from direct experience, in psychological research, this is the data we gather from direct observation of ppt. This includes observation but also experimentation, self-report, case studies and content analysis.

116
Q

define objectivity

A

data should be collected and interpreted in ways that avoid bias, meaning the data is not influenced by the researcher’s opinions or expectations. Research that has been affected by bias produces subjective conclusions.

117
Q

what are ways to improve objectivity

A

systematic data collection, double-blind, peer review

118
Q

define replicability

A

scientists are required to carefully record their methods and produce standardised procedures so that other scientists can repeat.

119
Q

define falsifiability

A

Karl popper argues that the ability to collect supporting evidence for a theory I snot enough for that theory to be genuinely scientific. For a theory to be genuinely scientific, it needs to be constructed in a way it can be empirically tested. This means the theory can be tested in a way that demonstrates it is not true.

120
Q

define paradigm shift

A

philosopher of science Thomas Kuhn 1972, suggests scientific fields develop in a series of “scientific revolutions” known as paradigm shifts.

121
Q

what are the stages of an inductive/bottom up process of theory construction

A

1)observation
2)construct a testable hypothesis
3)conduct an experiment and gain experimental data
4)propose a theory that explains the results

122
Q

define meta-analysis

A

a process that collects and combines the results of a range of previously published studies asking similar research questions. The data collected is compared and reviewed together, and part of this review can include statistically combining all the data to produce an overall effect size and conclusion.

123
Q
A

Psychology (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions