Research Methods Flashcards
whats an aim?
a general statement of what the researchers intend to find out in a research study
whats a hypothesis?
a precise testable statement about the assumed relationship between variables
whats a directional hypothesis?
states there will be a change and the direction in which it will go in
whats a non directional hypothesis?
predicts a change but not the direction of the change
whats a null hypothesis?
no significant difference exists
whats the independent variable?
characteristic that changes
whats the dependant variable?
being measured
whats operationalisation?
clearly defining the variables in terms of how they can be measured
what do psychologists do in a study? (the order) four steps
theory - prediction - experimental - conclusion
“lack of sleep affects reaction time” is this directional or non?
NON
“”high temperatures grow tomatoes quickly” non or directional?
directional but bad
what is the IV and DV of “sleep affects how quickly you complete a crossword”?
IV- less than or more than 8 hours of sleep
DV- time how many seconds it takes them to complete it
define extraneous variables
any variable luch affects the DV if not controlled
state what four things extraneous variables are divided into and define them?
• demand characteristics - participants know the aim and therefore change their behaviour
• investigator effects - any effects of the researchers behaviour on the outcomes of the research/DV
• participant variables - individual differences between participants that may affect the DV
• situational variables - any features of the experimental situation that may affect the DV
give examples of:
• investigator effects
• participant variables
• situational variables
from the two vs no sweet memory experiment in class
• sampling tech used, how they interact with participants
• IQ, amount of sleep
• noise, view of the board
define standardisation?
• using exactly the same procedures and instructions for all participants
example of standardisation?
• same words, same time, same room/ situation
define randomisation
• the use of chance to control bias
eg. names in hat at 1 to 2 method
what is the aim of any psychological study?
• provide information about how people behave in ‘real life’- the everyday settings which life is lived
what is the risk on ppt if the study is too artificial
they will not act as they normally would
name and define the different experimental design?
• repeated measures design - there is only one group of participants that take part in both conditions
• independent groups design - there are two separate groups of participants (one for condition A one for B)
• matched pairs design - two separate groups matches into pairs for certain qualities eg age
evaluation of repeated measures design and how to deal with limitations?
pos: removed participant characteristics
neg: order effects, increase demand characteristics, conditions may differ
dealing with it: counterbalancing
evaluation of independent groups design and how to deal with limitations?
pos: order effects removed, less chance of demand characteristics
neg: more ppt needed, lots of participant variables uncontrolled, need to be careful with standardisation
fix it: make groups as similar as pos, randomly allocate to remove bias
evaluation of matched pairs design and how to deal with limitations?
pos: decrease ppt variables, order effects not an issue
neg: difficult to match up
fix it: conduct a pilot study (small scale version) to consider key variables to match
state where it occurs and describe:
- order effects
- counterbalancing
- random allocation
- repeated measures = practice (knowing what to do, bias), fatigue (tired so does worse)
- repeated measures = “ABBA” half of the participants do A first then B others do B then A
- independent groups = they are allocated to a condition (A or B) by tossing a coin or picking a number
define reliability?
(being repeatable)
• different researchers doing the same method gets the same results - consistency, high reliability, standardisation, high control
define validity
(is it truthful)
• does it measure what it was supposed to measure
• the extent to which an observed effect is genuine
define internal validity
whether the effects of an experiment is due to the IV and not EVs
• low internal val= high amount of EVs
define external validity
(mundane realism)
(ecological validity)
whether it can be generalised to the outside world
low = too artificial
name the four types of experiments:
laboratory
field
natural
quasi
describe a laboratory experiment
• take place in a controlled artificial environment - usually in uni’s
• EV’s controlled - clear cause + effects established and very controlled
• standardised procedures
• most scientific form
• objective - free from bias - researcher detached
describe a field experiment
• experiment in everyday real life setting
• IV -> DV
• extraneous variables different to control
• particpants are unaware - demand characteristics lowered
explain a natural experiment
• researcher doesnt manipulate the IV, occurred naturally
• used when its not practical or ethical to manipulate IV
define a quasi experiment
is conducted when the IV is based an existing differences between
people
name the strengths and weaknesses of a labatory experiment?
strengths:
• high reliablity
• free from bias
• very controlled
• high internal validity
• EV’s controlled
weaknesses:
• overartificial - lacks realism/ external validity
• investigator effects can occur
• internal validity could be compromised - demand characteristics
name the strengths and weaknesses of a field experiment?
strengths:
• the participants are unaware - removes chance of demand characterstics.
• higher mundane realism / external validity
• more research opportunities
weaknesses:
• lower internal validity - more EVs.
• low reliability
• ethical issues - not consensual.
name the strengths and weaknesses of a natural experiment?
strengths:
• high realism/ external validity
• research opportunities in areas that wouldnt be possible otherwise.
weaknesses:
• low internal validity - unknown EVs
• low reliability
• lack of opportunity
• demand characteristics - bias
define an ethical issue?
• these arise when a conflict exists between the rights of the ppts in research studies and the goal of research to produce authentic, valid and worthwhile results
name the 5 guidelines for the British Psychology Society?
• consent (informed)
• deception
• confidentiality and privacy
• right to withdraw
• protection from harm
explain informed consent
ppt should know as much as possible ab the procedure before they agree to do it (eg, how long it will take, what they will be asked to do)
• they should also be aware of the aims and their rights to be able to withdraw at any point
• some believe that informed consent makes a study meaningless because ppts do not act naturally if they know the aims
explain deception?
deliberately misleading our participants in some way - debrief after !!!
explain confidentiality and privacy?
• legal rights for ppts, researchers should do everything possible to ensure anonymity by removing names and identifying details
• ppt have the right to control info ab themselves
explain protection from
harm?
• PPT SHOULD BE LEFT IN THE SAME WAY THEY ENTERED
• psychological and physical harm
• allowed to withdraw if uncomfortable
• should NOT be subject to embarrassment, stress or under pressure
whats the mnemonic to remember ethical guidelines?
Can - confidentiality
Do - deception
Cant - consent
Do - DEBRIEF (after)
With - withdraw
Participants - protection of ppts