Research Methods - 1.2 Flashcards
Explain Interpretivism
What 3 things are they interested in?
What does Weber call this?
What type of methods do they prefer?
What type of info do they use?
What is an example of this?
> Interested in experiences, accounts, and opinions of people
> Interested in putting yourself in someone elses shoes
> Weber calls this Verstehen - (Understanding)
> Prefer methods that produce qualitative data, descriptive
> Info they use makes us feel for what something is like.
> e.g. what it feels like to get Good GCSE’s or if your marriage ends in divorce
Explain Positivism (Structural)
See world as what?
These can only be measured with what?
What are examples of sociologists?
What methods do they prefer?
What type of Info do they use?
What is an example of this?
> See world made up of scientific laws
> These can only be measured with hard empirical proof
> Examples of Sociologists e.g. Durkheim
> Prefer methods that produce Quantitative data.
> Info in numerical or statistical form
> e.g. NO of Girls who get A* in GCSE’s or % of marriage ending in divorce.
What are examples of Data and Methods used by Structuralists
> Closed Questionaire
Structured Interviews
Stats
Experiments
What are examples of Data and Methods used by
Interpretivists
> Open Questionaire
Unstructured Interview
Life Documents
Participant Obs
In Social Surveys, what is the procedure?
Procedures to ask questions on aspect of human behaviour, sociologist is interested in e.g voting
What are the 2 Main RM involved in Social Surveys?
Questionnaires and Interview
What are the 3 Aspects considered in relation to evaluating the usefulness of Sociological Research Methods?
> Practicality
Ethical
Theoretical
Give issues that come under Practicality that need to be considered?
- Time
- Access
- Funding
- Cost
- Personal Danger
Explain Issues that come under Ethical that need to be considered?
- Harm
- Deception
- Privacy and Confidentiality
- Social Effects of Research
Explain Issues that come under Theoretical that need to be considered?
- Objectivity
- Reliability
- Validity
- Representative
Define Reliability, in relation to Research Methods?
Other sociologists could repeat research and get same results
Define Validity, in relation to Research Methods?
Provides true picture of topic researched.
Define Interviews in relation to Research Methods
> Alternative method for questionnaires, usually face 2 face
Useful for getting more detailed info
Allowing more natural and flexible approach to questioning
Vary from un/structured interviews
Define Semi-Structured Interview
Each interview has same set of questions, but interviewer can also probe for more info.
Define Structured Interviews
Who are they preferred by?
> Researcher reads out list of fixed questions, using same tone of voice, facial expressions etc
> Structured/formal interviews are preferred by positivists.
Explain Positivist views on Structured Interviews, in relation to advantages of Structured Interviews?
Positivists believe structured interviews are an unbiased method that can test a hypothesis and examine relationships between variables.
GIve the 3 Practical Advantages of Structured Interviews?
> Higher response rates than questionnaires, interviewers can persuade people to answer questions.
> Available to clarify misunderstandings.
> Overcome problems with literacy.
Give the 2 Ethical Advantages of Structured Interviews?
> No issues of deception, due to informed consent.
> Not too personally invasive
Give the 3 Theoretical Advantages of Structured Interviews?
> Can assess truthfulness of participant - More valid than questionnaires
> Uses quantitative data, more reliable
> More reliable, as researcher can standardise and control them, make sure they’re done with same questions, tone of voice etc.
Why do Interpretivists criticise Structured Interviews?
Unable to develop relationship of trust and understanding (verstehen)
Why do Feminists criticise Structured Interviews?
> Feminists say structured interviews are patriarchal, giving a distorted picture of women’s experiences
What is Graham’s Feminist criticism of Structured Interviews?
> Also say researcher imposes categories on women.
> So difficult for them to express experiences, concealing unequal power relationships between sexes.
Give the 3 Practical Disadvantages of Structured Interviews?
> Time-Consuming
> More costly than self-completion questionnaires, as interviewers have to be trained and paid.
> Interviewer effect: Person may only give answers they feel are socially acceptable.
Explain the Interpretivist Notion of the Imposition Problem, in relation Practical Disadvantages of Structured Interviews?
- Can’t express true feelings on topic, as questions and possible answers pre-chosen by researcher.
- Limiting what they are able to say, so may not reflect issues respondents feel are vital
Give the Ethical Disadvantages of Structured Interviews?
> Age, Gender of interviewer may affect respondent. Can make respondent feel uncomfortable
Explain 2 Theoretical Disadvantage of Structured Interviews?
> Limits possible answers participant give - lower validity compared to unstructured
> Fewer people than questionnaires, less representative
Define Unstructured Interviews
> Unstructured interviews are informal, gives respondent more freedom, but researcher asks questions to ensure respondent keeps to subject.
What are examples of Unstructured Interview Studies?
> Bernstein - (Speech Codes)
> Hargreaves - (3 Stages to Labelling)
> Dobash & Dobash - (DV)
> Oakley - (Maternity and Childbirth)
Explain what occurred in Bernstein’s Study of Speech Codes in Semi Structured Interviews
> Studied kids of different social classes.
Study found 2 ways of speaking: Restricted Code and Elaborate Code
MC used Elaborate Code
WC limited to restricted code
Hargreaves Example of Unstructured Interviews
What did he use?
Looked at what?
What 3 stages to Labelling did he find?
> Used unstructured interviews and PO in 2 schools.
> Looked at how teachers label students
> Found 3 stages to labelling: Speculation, Elaboration, Confirmation
Explain Interpretivist views on Unstructured Interviews, in relation to advantages of Unstructured Interviews?
Interpretivists argue unstructured interviews enable researchers to get a deeper understanding (verstehen) of individual.
Explain Feminist views on Unstructured Interviews, in relation to advantages of Unstructured Interviews?
Feminist favour them as, they allow researcher to build more equal relationship, based on empathy and trust.
Give the 2 Practical Advantages of Unstructured Interviews?
> Better response rate than questionnaires
> Can follow up responses in-depth & develop on new ideas.
Explain Rapport and Sensitivity, in relation to Ethical Advantages of Unstructured Interviews?
> Informal so allows interviewer to develop a rapport helping them feel more comfortable and open up, good for sensitive topics.
Give the 2 Ethical Advantages of Unstructured Interviews?
> Interviews can refuse to answer questions.
> Taking part involves informed consent
Give the Theoretical Advantages of Unstructured Interviews?
Valid can assess truthfulness of participant
Explain Positivist views on Unstructured Interviews, in relation to Disadvantages of Unstructured Interviews?
Lack of quantitative data so can’t establish cause-and-effect relationship
Give the 4 Practical Disadvantages of Unstructured Interviews?
> Direction of interview could be lost
> Time-Consuming. Detail of conversation has to be written down & takes longer to analyse findings. e.g. some Dobash interviews on DV took 12hrs
> Costly, Interviewers have to be trained and paid, means less interviews conducted.
> Interviewer effect: Person may only give answers they feel are socially acceptable.
Outline how the Interviewer may identify too closely with interviewees
Researchers Ethnicity and gender may mean they can relate to experiences of a certain group e.g. Black Boys - so can’t be unbiased
Explain Rich’s idea on how inequalities between interviewer and person, may affect responses, in relation to practical disadvantages of Unstructured Interviews?
e.g. when adults interview kids, their need to please adult may affect results.
Give the 2 Ethical Disadvantages of Unstructured Interviews?
> Could be intrusive, have emotional effects.
> Interview on sensitive topics may cause psychological harm.
Explain the 2 Theoretical Disadvantages of Unstructured Interviews?
> Small samples. Not very representative, harder to generalise.
Not reliable
Define Laboratory Experiments (LE)
Experiments take place in an artificial controlled environment e.g. laboratory.
What are examples of Lab Experiment Studies?
> Milgram - (Teacher Shocks Learner)
Zimbardo - (Stimulated Prison)
Mayo - (Workers Productivity)
Explain Milgram’s Study in relation to Laboratory Experiments
What was he interested in?
Teacher was instructed by researcher to do what?
He wanted to test what?
> Was interested in effects of authority on our behaviour.
> Teacher was instructed by researcher to teach learner a range of paired words and to punish learner with a shock if they gave wrong answers.
> He wanted to test how far teacher would go before, adamantly refusing to further shock the learner.
Outline Ethical Issues Involved in Milgram’s Experiments
> Harm to Participants
> Deception
Explain Zimbardo’s Study in relation to Laboratory Experiments
What was created?
Why did the Experiment had to be ended early?
Many guards showed what?
> A simulated prison was created and 24 volunteers were assigned to the roles of guard or prisoner.
> Experiment had to be ended early, due to the behaviour it was inducing in both guards and prisoners.
> Many of guards showed they enjoyed power they had.
Explain Mayo’s Study in relation to Laboratory Experiments
Researched what?
Was working with what?
What are examples of variables he changed?
And why?
What happened when he improved conditions and when he worsened them?
He concluded what?
> Researched factors affecting workers productivity in a power plant.
> Was working with 5 female volunteers, who was aware of the experiment
> He changed diff variables e.g. Lighting, heating etc, to see what effect it had on their productivity.
> Their productivity went up, when he improved conditions, and rose even more when they worsened.
> He concluded they weren’t responding to changes, as they wanted to please him.
Explain Positivist views on LE’s, in relation to advantages of LE?
> Can find scientific laws of cause and effect and determine behaviour e.g. Authority
Behaviour patterns can be measured quantitatively
Give the Practical Advantages of LE?
> Can test major social problem in a small scale environment (e.g. Zimbardo Institutional Aggression
Give the 2 Ethical Advantages of LE?
> Usually right for ppl to withdraw
> Sociologist’s personal feelings don’t affect results.
Explain the Theoretical Advantages of LE?
> Reliable Method, other scientists can then replicate it.
Explain Interpretivists views on LE, in relation to Disadvantages of LE?
- Artificial situation, so has little relevance to real world, human behaviour can’t be explained by cause and effect, but interactions and processes
Give the 3 Practical Disadvantages of LE?
> Impossible for researcher to control all variables affecting participant’s behaviour. e.g. feelings, mood etc.
> Hawthorne Effect e.g. Mayo
> Can’t be used to study the past
Give 2 Therotical Disadvantages of LE?
> Lacks in validity
> Not representative
Give the 3 Ethical Disadvantages of LE?
> Often difficult for participants to give informed consent e.g. Kids and people with learning difficulties)
> Deception
> Some form of harm may occur e.g. Milgram
Define Field Experiments (FE)
Tight control of variables, in irl cases. Researcher manipulates variables to see effect it has on subject, ppl unaware.
Explain Interpretivists views on FE’s, in relation to advantages of FE?
> Less artificial than lab experiments, producing more valid info.
Give the 2 Practical Advantages of FE?
> More realistic, so give more valid pic of effects on ppl’s behaviour
> Can test largescale social problem in small-scale environment
Give the Ethical Advantages of FE?
> Less psychologically harmful as it’s a ‘natural’ situation.
Give the Theoretical Advantages of FE?
> Valid
Explain Positivists views on FE’s, in relation to Disadvantages of FE?
Less control over variables.
Give the 3 Practical Disadvantages of FE?
> Access issues.
> Not possible for researcher to control all variables that affect participant’s behaviour e.g. mood, feelings, state of health.
> Few situations can be adapted to be FE where influence of only one factor’s tested.
Give the 2 Ethical Disadvantages of FE?
> Deception
> No informed consent
Give the 2 Theoretical Disadvantages of FE?
> Not reliable, as of specific social situation studied
> Small samples, not representative
What are examples of Field Experiment Studies?
> Rosenthal and Jacobson’s - (IQ Tests)
> Rosenhan - (Schizophrenic Hospital Patients)
Explain Rosenthal and Jacobson’s Field Experiment in Education?
(Random Fake IQ Tests)
> Researchers gave IQ tests to students.
> 20% of students selected at random
> Teachers told these students would show fast intellectual growth
> In the year between they were re-tested.
> These Students made greatest gains in IQ and progress.
> Teachers believed this label
> Giving them better grades and reports.
> SFP had been created
Explain Rosenhan Field Experiment on Schizophrenic Hospital Patients?
12 researchers went to where?
After being diagnosed/admitted they went back to what?
Hospital staff couldn’t find what?
Several where what?
2nd part involved asking staff at Hospital what?
They falsely did what?
> 12 researchers went to 12 different mental hospitals in California claiming to be schizophrenic.
> After being diagnosed/admitted they went back to ‘normal’ behaviour to see if they’d get released
> They couldn’t find a single fake patient, so believed they all exhibited symptoms of ongoing mental illness.
> Several were confined for months.
> 2nd part involved asking staff at hospital to detect non-existent “fake” patients.
> They falsely identified huge NO of real patients as impostors.
Define the Comparative Method
> Carried out only in mind of sociologist- it’s a thought experiment.
> Doesn’t need researcher to experiment on people.
> Used to find cause and effect relationships
How does Comparative Method work?
Identify what?
Compare to what?
> Identify 2 groups of people who are alike in all major respects except for 1 variable we’re interested in
> Compare 2 groups to see if this 1 difference between them has an effect.
What are examples of Comparative Method Studies?
> Durkheim’s - (Classical Study of Suicide)
Explain Durkheim’s Classical Study of Suicide - Example of Comparative Method
What caused high rates of suicide?
Argued diff religions did what?
What was the difference between Catholicism and Protestanism, in relation to Integration?
From this he predicted what?
Tested what?
> ‘Low levels of integration of individuals into social groups caused high rates of suicide’
> Argued diff religions produced diff levels of integration
> Catholicism producing higher levels than Protestantism.
> From this, he predicted Protestants would’ve higher suicide rate than Catholics.
> Tested his prediction by comparing suicide rates from OS - he was right.
4 Advantages of Comparative Method
> Avoids artificiality
> Doesn’t need real people
> Able to study past events
> No ethical problems e.g. harming or deceiving subjects.
2 Disadvantages of Comparative Method
> Less control over variables than field experiments. So less certain variables have actually caused something.
> Relies on use of OS which interpretivists argue lack validity
What is Non-Participant Observation?
Observing the group or event but not taking part in it.
What type of data, does NPO yield?
Quantitative data
Who is NPO favoured by?
Positivists
What are examples of NPO Studies
> Pritchard - (African Tribes Black Magic) - (Overt)
> Williams - (Teenagers and Cocaine) - (Overt)
> Sewell - (Teachers vs Black Caribbean Boys)
Explain Pritchard’s Study in relation to NPO
What did the Tribe believe illness was caused by?
> EE Pritchard did overt NPO of tribe in Africa.
> Tribe believed illness was caused by black magic, and cured with consulting oracles, poisoning chickens and blowing water through a pipe.
Explain Williams Study in relation to NPO
Since 1982, what did he do?
> Williams used overt NPO
> est 1982 spent weeks, and months “hanging out” with teenage cocaine ring in cocaine bars and street corners etc.
Explain Sewell’s Study in relation to NPO
How many Schools did Sewell study and using which methods?
Though teachers saw themselves as what?
Black-Caribbean boys were part of what?
How did teachers treat them?
> Sewell did study of 2 secondary schools with NPO and unstructured interviews.
> Though teachers saw themselves as non-racist.
> Black-Caribbean boys were part of 85% of exclusions and they only made up 1/3 of population.
> Teachers were stricter and more controlling of these students
Explain Positivists views on NPO, in relation to advantages of NPO?
Less emotionally involved so more objective.
Give the 4 Practical Advantages of NPO?
> Detached Method, unbiased not influenced by relationships
> Easier to blend in background, so ppl act naturally
> Less time-consuming and cheaper than PO
> Quantitive data, so can establish cause and effect relationships