Beliefs - Theories of Religion - 5.1 Flashcards
Functionalism & Religion (Key thinkers)
> Durkheim (Sacred & Profane, Totemism, Collective Conscience & Cognitive Functions)
> Malinowski (Psychological Functions)
> Parsons (Values and meaning)
> Bellah ( Civil Religion as Functional Alternative)
General Functionalist view of Religion
> Religion plays a central part in creating and maintaining value consensus, order and solidarity.
Durkheim (Sacred & Profane)
The sacred are things set apart and forbidden, inspiring feelings of awe, fear and wonder, with taboos and prohibitions.
The profane are ordinary things that have no special significance.
Durkheim (Totemism & Rituals)
> Totems of the aborigines group (e.g. animals & plants with magical qualities) symbolises the clan’s identity.
> Worship of the totem/rituals group creates social solidarity actually worshipping society.
Collective Conscience
Norms & values, making cooperation possible, without these society would disintegrate
Durkheim (Rituals & collective conscience
> Remind people of the power of society, they powerless without it
> Makes us feel part of something greater than us, give strength to face life’s problems.
Durkheim & Cognitive Functions of Religion
> Basics of science & reason in religious texts (e.g. Bible) helps us think conceptually
> Passed through generations, so sharing thoughts & concepts.
Malinowski & 2 Psychological Functions
> Canoe magic helps cope with stress which could undermine social solidarity
>
- At times of crisis
>
- When the outcome is uncertain (e.g. sea fishing)
Malinowski (role of religion in times of crisis e.g. birth & death)
> At death, funerals reinforce solidarity, idea of heaven gives people comfort
> At birth people get baptised, gives idea of protection by god, so gives security.
Malinowski & Uncertain Outcomes
> e.g. Trobriand Islanders took part in Lagoon & Ocean fishing
- Lagoon: Safe & unpredictable = no ritual
- Ocean: Dangerous & uncertain, so used rituals for safe journey, gives sense of control, eases tensions & reinforces solidarity
Briefly outline Parsons two Functions of Religion
- Creates & legitimates norms & values
2. Answers to life’s big questions that could undermine commitment to society’s values
Parsons (Religion & Legitimation of Norms & Values)
> By sacralising them - making them sacred/special
> e.g. Protestantism sacralised American values - ‘God Bless America’
> e.g. individualism, meritocracy & discipline, promotes value consensus & social solidarity
Parsons (religion answers life’s big questions)
> e.g. purpose of life, afterlife, why good people suffer
> Evil defended as test rewarded in heaven
> Helps people cope with adversity maintains social solidarity.
Bellah (Civil Religion)
> Creates social solidarity in US, in a way individual religions can’t.
> e.g. loyalty to nation, expressed by symbols & beliefs e.g. oath of allegiance to the flag
> Sacralises US way of life, binds different people together from different backgrounds
> Unlike churches, only for some Americans
Bellah’s (Civil Religion as a Functional Alternative)
> Supernatural belief not needed
> e.g. Nazi Germany with the Church of Nazism
> includes cult practices focused on worshipping German nation/army without god.
Why is Bellah’s idea of Religion as Functional Alternative flawed?
Conflicts with substantive definition of religion, needing a belief in supernatural.
A03 Criticisms of the functionalist view of the role of religion in society
> Postmodernism (Durkheim’s theory outdated in a multi-faith society)
> Hamilton (Religion can be a source of conflict not solidarity)
Postmodernist Criticisms of Durkheim
> No longer applicable, society more diverse & fragmented.
> Religion no longer binds everyone, no longer a shared value system, we now have individual value systems.
Briefly state two general criticisms of Durkheim
> His understanding of totems was flawed
> His theory is only applicable to small-scale societies
How is Durkheim’s study on Totemism flawed?
Totems not manifestations of group or society, as clans shared totems, so weren’t unique & special.
How is Durkheim’s theory only applicable to small-scale societies
Hard to apply to larger societies, where many religions are in conflict.
How does Hamilton criticise Functionalism?
> Ignores how religion can be source of social division & internal conflict
> e.g. Sunni & Shia’s, ignores hate crimes & fundamentalism.
Interpretivism (Key thinker)
> Berger (religion is a social construction)