research into conformity - asch Flashcards
aim of asch’s procedure
to investigate the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform
the procedure of asch’s study
- 123 male students participated in a ‘vision test’. - each person in the room had to say whether lines A, B or C matched exhibit 1.
- the answer was always obvious. The confederates had previously agreed in advance what their answer would be.
- the 1 real participant was not aware of this.
- there were 16 rounds, 12 of which were clinical trials.
results of asch’s study
- on average around 1/3 of the participants conformed with the clearly incorrect majority on the clinical trials
- for the 12 clinical trials, around 25% of participants never conformed and around 75% conformed at least once.
how did difficulty affect conformity
harder the task - increased conformity
how was the difficulty of the task in asch’s study changed
- asch made the difference between the line lengths smaller
- this made them appear closer together so made it more difficult than the original task.
research support for difficulty of the task
Lucas (2006) difficult maths problems = more conformity due to ISI
how did changing the size of the majority affect results
Very small group = decrease conformity
Large scale group = increase conformity
how was the size of the group changed in asch’s study
- variations ranged from 1 confederate to 15. 1 confederate = participants conformed 3% of critical trials
- 2 confederates = 12.8% conformity. 3 confederates = 32% conformity, same as original with 7 confederates
research support to contradict size of majority
Bond (2005) argued that Normative influence is likely to be strong when..
how did unanimity affect conformity for asch’s study
unanimous verdict = increased conformity
disturbed unanimity = decreased conformity
how was unanimity changed for asch’s study
- one variation = 1 confederate told to give correct answer. 5% conformity
- another variation = 2 confederates gave a different incorrect answer to majority, Conformity = 9%
research study to contradict unanimity
- moscovici (1969) found that in the consistent condition, the real participants only agreed 1.25% of the trials
- a consistent minority is 6.95% more effective than an inconsistent minority