Research for Evidence Based Practice and Systemic Reviews Flashcards
Why need research for animal management
- find research gaps
- overcome limits in management
- cure/prevent disease
- increase/maintain productivity
- improve welfare
- sustainability
- profit
- prevent losses form death/disease
- improve public perception
Lameness in sheep
- 2004 % sheep lame
- what is footrot
- cost to sheep industry
- 10% (80% caused by footrot)
- bacterial disease that causes inflammation of foot/hoof and results in wt loss, pain, distress and reduced productivity (DLWG)
- pain = hoof come away from foot, increase cortisol levels and stress
- less likely to jump females = reduce mating/lambs
- £24 million
King et al 2013 - lameness
- wanted to see if routine foot trimming actually helps prevent lameness and famers perceptions on results
- no difference in lameness prevalence/foot damage/level of footrot and interdigital dermatitis
- farmers who use RFT reluctant to stop
- farmers with large flocks and high lameness prevelance more likely to stop.
- barriers to uptake recomendations: habbit, no disadvantage to stopping, need longer trials/larger no. sheep/ more variables (geography/soil/season)
Current practices preventing lameness in sheep
- FAWC targets
- farm animal welfare council
- lameness reduced from 10% to 5% by 2016 and 2% by 2021
hit 2016 target but not further - average lameness = 3.2%, 52% farmers = <2%
- Best et al 2020
Current practices preventing lameness in sheep
- % farmers carrying out management practices
- Clifton and Green 2017
- routine foot trimming at least once a year is not recommended: 2004 = 76% 2013= 56%
- always use trimming to treat foot rot not recomended: 2004 = 76%
2013 = 40% - always use antibiotic injection to treat foot rot is recommended: 2004= 10% 2013=24%
Positive factors that aid implementation
- greater evidence
- recommendations by well known body (FAWC)
- benefits clearly described
- accessible written information - five point plan
Five point plan
- Cull = build resistance
- Vaccine = establish immunity
- Avoid, treat, quarantine = reduce disease challenge
Barriers to implement research findings
- unlicensed product for certain use
- reluctant people (habbit, lack of participation)
- lack of funding
- lack of staff/time
- generational changes
- relavence of research
- severity of problem
- lack of evidence/education
- bad previous experiences
- impact of outcome
- how quick see results
What are systemic reviews and evidence based practice examples
= an analysis of secondary data
- assess and analyses all available literature following a distinct methodology to answer a specific research question
- Evidence-based veterinary medicine
- Evidence-based agriculture
5 steps of systemic reviews
- Ask - identify/fram question proffesion need answers to
- Aquire - find best available evidence on subject of interest
- Appraise - appraise literature for quality and sources of bias that may affect validity of results (eliminate papaers)
- Summarise the evidence and extract
- interpret findings/results, analyse results. Meta-analysis if appropriate
PICO method (ask)
- patient or population - who, specific as possible (e.g. geriatric dogs, puppies, spaniels
- intervention - what intervention interested in e.g. management strategy, diagnostic test, type of food)
- comparison/control - main alturnative (e.g. another management strategy want to compare, control, no intervention)
- outcome - what trying to acheive, measure, improve (e.g. what are the patient relevant consequences
PICO (acquire) what to do next
- identify synonyms and related terms
- different authours use different terms to reffer to same concept
EBVM appraise
- critically appraise articles
- strenghts/weaknesses
- bias
- study design
- subjects
- methodologies used and how well performed
- statistical analysis
- presentation and interpretation of results
Advantages of systematic reviews
- access to large quantity of data
- results more applicable to species poplation
- identify research gaps
- advance practices quality
- identify areas which research should not focus
- draw strong conclusions = decrease time from research discoveries to implementation
Limitations of systemic reviews
- many studies excluded due to incomplete reporting of data/methods
- variability in methods used to generate data between studies
- publication bias (more publications of studies with positive result)
- criteria for appraisal will vary between researchers
- data often funded by commercial organisations, possible bias
- lack of large scale studies
- lack of previous research available to draw ideas