RESEARCH AND STATISTICS Flashcards

1
Q

Study in which 2 groups are followed
prospectively over time to see which exposures/
risks cause disease and to provide information
about prognosis

A

Cohort study (type of observational study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Study best suited to evaluate the risks and benefits of a new treatment, establishes a direct causal relationship between treatment and outcomes

A

Randomized control trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Type of study used to compare a new diagnostic
test to the current gold standard diagnostic test in a given population

A

Cross-sectional study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Retrospective study in which people with a disease are compared to those without the disease to evaluate risk factors, useful for rare outcomes

A

Case-control study (type of observational study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Retrospective statistical analysis of several studies on the same topic

A

Meta-analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the best way to eliminate confounding
variables?

A

Randomization of study subjects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Type of bias that occurs when an association
between an exposure and an outcome is distorted by another variable

A

Confounding bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The percent of people with the disease in a given population being studied

A

Prevalence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The number of new cases of a given disease in a
specific period of time

A

Incidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The probability of correctly identifying those who truly have the disease

A

Sensitivity = TP/(TP+FN)
SnOUT sensitivity → rules out disease when
they’re negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The probability of correctly identifying those who truly do not have the disease

A

Specificity = TN/(TN+FP)
SPIN specificity → rules in disease when they’re
positive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The probability of correctly identifying those not
having a disease among those whose tests are
negative

A

Negative predictive value = TN/(TN+FN)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The probability of correctly identifying those who truly have the disease among those whose tests are positive

A

Positive predictive value = TP/(TP+FP)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The hypothesis of no difference, i.e., daily
exercising does not reduce the risk of heart disease

A

Null hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The hypothesis of difference, i.e., daily exercising does reduce the risk of heart disease

A

Alternative hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rejecting the null hypothesis when in fact it is
true—a difference that was seen when one does not exist

A

Type 1 error

17
Q

Failure to reject the null hypothesis when the null hypothesis is false—a difference that was not seen when one does exist

A

Type 2 error

18
Q

The probability that a study can detect a treatment effect

A

Power of a study

19
Q

A range of values with a specified probability that a given parameter falls in that range

A

Confidence interval

20
Q

What is the interpretation of a confidence interval that includes 0 or 1

A

There is no statistical significance

21
Q

The total number needed to treat to prevent one bad outcome or adverse events

A

The number needed to treat
NNT = 1/absolute risk reduction

22
Q

The total number of patients receiving intervention
for each patient that is harmed

A

The number needed to harm
NNH = 1/attributable risk