Relationships Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is a relationship

A

A continuing and often committed association between two or more people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is natural selection

A

The argument that genes which are advantageous for survival are naturally selected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is sexual selection

A

A form of natural selection which suggests that the characteristics that increase reproductive success are passed on and may become exaggerated through generations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is anisogamy

A

Refers to the sex differences between male and female sex cells

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the consequence of anisogamy

A

There is no shortage of fertile males but there are of fertile females (they are a rarer resource). Anisogamy gives rise to two types of sexual selection:
- intersexual (between the sexes)
-intrasexual (within the sexes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intersexual selection - female strategy

A

-This involves strategies that are used by one sex to attract the other sex
-Evolutionists would argue that females prefer quality over quantity and therefore intersexual selection is particularly important for them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Intersexual selection impact on partner preference - trivers

A

-argues that females make greater commitments before, during and after the birth of her offspring so will be more selective than males. Therefore, it is female preference that will determine which features are passed onto the offspring.
-Once a trait e.g., height is passed down through several generations is gradually becomes exaggerated (a runaway process).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fisher (1930) - the sexy son’s hypothesis (intersexual)

A

-Suggests the genes we see today are those with enhanced reproductive success.
-A female who mates with a male with a certain ‘sexy’ trait will have sons with this trait.
This son will then get selected by other females and the trait will get passed on and the ‘sexy’ trait is perpetuated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Intrasexual selection- male strategy

A
  • This involves strategies between males to try be the one that is selected.
  • males prefer quantity over quality and therefore intrasexual selection is particularly important for them.
  • ‘Winning’ males get their genes (and therefore characteristics passed) onto their offspring and this trait is likely to be perpetuated.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intrasexual selection impact on partner preference

A
  • can explain the physical differences in the body size and physical appearance between males and females (this is known as physical dimorphism)
    e.g., men being larger to fight off competition and females looking more youthful.
  • The behavioural consequence of this strategy is that competitive behaviours are more likely to be passed on e.g., deceitfulness, intelligence and aggression. Therefore, aggression can be argued to be an adaptive strategy.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Theories of attraction

A
  • self disclosure
  • physical attractiveness
  • filter theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Self disclosure

A

•voluntary sharing of private aspects of the self with another person

• relationship formation is built on trust with another person, which is demonstrated by gradually revealing info
•leads to greater intimacy and therefore more satisfaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Social penetration theory - Altman & Taylor

A
  • self-disclosure is the gradual process of revealing your inner self to someone else, revealing too much straight away might be inappropriate.
  • By revealing personal information, you display trust.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Breadth and depth (onion analogy)

A
  • relationships move from superficial levels (low breadth and depth of self-disclosure)
  • to deeper and more intimate levels (high breadth and depth of self-disclosure) as individuals disclose more personal information to each other.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Importance of reciprocity in self disclosure

A
  • Once you have disclosed something that reveals your true self, hopefully your partner will respond in a way that is rewarding, with understanding, empathy, and their own intimate thoughts and feelings.
  • This leads to a balance of self-disclosure between both partners, deepening the relationship.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Factors involved in self disclosure

A
  1. Appropriateness of the disclosure
  2. Attributions for the disclosure
  3. Gender differences
  4. Content of the disclosure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Appropriateness

A

• Sometimes disclosing personal information is inappropriate.
• Is what is being said going against social norms?
• Those who contravene social norms will be seen as maladjusted and lacking in social skills.
• Attractiveness increases when the other person is sensitive to social norms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Attributions for the disclosure

A

• The reasons we believe a person is self-disclosing are important to us.
• Less attraction occurs if an individual is seen as the kind of person who discloses personal information to everyone, or if the situation is not appropriate.
• More attraction occurs if we believe an individual sees us as someone they especially want to disclose intimate information to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Gender differences

A

• Women are generally seen as better communicators of and more interested in intimate information, therefore intimate self-disclosure by males may be seen as less appropriate than those by females.
• Alternatively self-disclosure by a male may be seen as very rewarding by a female, as it indicates he especially wants to disclose personal information to her.
• Males may not be used to this and so feel threatened by females self- disclosing intimate details.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Content of the disclosure

A

• Generally intimate disclosures are seen favourably.
• However, disclosure of highly intimate information may be seen as inappropriate and as violating social norms, especially if the relationship is in its early stages.
• This could decrease attraction, as the recipient of the information may feel threatened and unsure of how to respond.
• Attraction is stronger when self-disclosure is of moderate intimacy rather than low or high intimacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Features deemed physically attractive

A
  • Symmetrical faces - Found people with symmetrical faces are more attractive as they have an honest set of genetic fitness
  • neotenous faces - (baby face) with widely separated large eyes, a small chin and a small nose is deemed to be attractive as it triggers a caring instinct
  • larger males
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is meant by the matching hypothesis

A

-claims that people are more likely to form a committed relationship with someone equally attractive or the same level of social desirability.
-The theory suggests that people assess their own value and then make realistic choices by selecting the best available potential partners who are also likely to share this same level of attraction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Walster et al - matching hypothesis

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

The halo effect

A
  • The halo effect is a type of cognitive bias whereby our perception of someone is positively influenced by our opinions of that person’s other related traits (Thorndike, 1920).
  • The halo effect can shape our perception of others’ intelligence and competence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

the attractiveness stereotype

A

•the tendency to assign positive qualities and traits to physically attractive people
•people judge attractive info to have higher morality, better mental health and greater intelligence.
•this reflects individuals prejudices, ideology and social perceptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

filter theory field of avaliables and field of desirables

A

• when choosing a partner people start by looking at the options that are available to us - field of available

• there are three filter individuals apply to narrow down partner choice to field of desirables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Filter theory levels - kerckhoff and Davis

A

• sociodemographic
•similarity of attitudes
•complementarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

sociodemographic filter

A

• eg proximity, education, social class, religion and the other important factors people are likely to pay attention to when we are meeting a person for the first time.
•these will determine the likelihood of meeting and socialising, which will in turn influence the likelihood of a relationships being formed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

similarity of attitudes

A

•people tend to view others as more attractive if they share the same core beliefs and values
• especially important in earlier stages
• is found through self disclosure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

complementarity

A

•each of the partners having some traits that the other partner lacks and helping each other to fulfil their needs
• plays a role in longer term relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Social exchange theory - Thibault and Kelly (1959)

A
  • is an economic theory of relationships. It describes romantic relationships using the economic terminology of rewards and costs. It assumes individuals make rational decisions about relationships.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Examples of rewards

A

Money, companionship,sex

33
Q

Examples of costs

A

Time,money, seeing their family and friends

34
Q

how is satisfaction judged (SET)

A

in terms of profit (rewards-costs)

35
Q

What is the minimax principle

A

The theory that claims that partners in relationships strive to minimise losses and maximise gains

36
Q

Two types of comparisons to judge satisfaction in a relationship

A
  • comparison levels (CL)
  • comparison level for alternative (CLalt)
37
Q

What is the comparison level (CL)

A
  • is based on person’s idea of how much reward they deserve to receive in relationships.
  • is subjective and depends on previous romantic experiences and cultural norms of what is appropriate to expect.
  • A person with high self-esteem will have higher expectations of rewards in relationships, whereas a person with low self-esteem will have lower expectations.
38
Q

comparison level for alternatives (CAlt)

A

• this considers whether a persons perception of other potential relationships would be more rewarding than being in their current relationship.
• we will stay in our relationship if we believe it is more rewarding then alternatives.

39
Q

four stages of relationships

A

• sampling
• Barganing
• commitment
• institutionalisation

40
Q

sampling

A

people explore potential rewards and costs of relationships, either by direct experience or by observing others

41
Q

bargaining

A

the first stage of any romantic relationship. partners exchange rewards and costs, figure out the most profitable exchanges and negotiate the dynamic ms of the relationship

42
Q

commitment

A

the relationship becomes more stable, partners become familiar with sources of rewards and costs and each others expectations. Rewards increase and costs lessen

43
Q

institutionalisation

A

partners are now settled down in their relationship because the norms of the relationship (rewards & costs) are firmly established.

44
Q

equity theory

A

states that for a relationship to be lasting there needs to be fairness.

one persons rewards & costs = another partners rewards minus their costs

45
Q

partners may get dissatisfied by either… (equity)

A

• under benefitting
• over benefiting

46
Q

under benefiting

A

• those who think they put a lot in but very little back
• can lead to them feeling angry/resentful

47
Q

over benefiting

A

• a person who gets more benefits out of the relationship than they put in
• them feeling guilt/shame

48
Q

how might the perception of equity change over time

A

whta seemed unfair in the beginning may become a norm as relationships progress or the partner who gives more may start working even harder on the relationship until the balance is restored

49
Q

what is the impact of inequity in a relationship

A

Equity theory predicts a strong correlation between the greater the perceived inequity and the greater the dissatisfaction.
A partner who feels that they’re receiving less profit in an unequitable relationship may respond by either leaving the relationship or working harder to make the relationship more equitable.

50
Q

how might partners try to restore equity

A

• redistribution
• realignment

51
Q

redistribution

A

Negotiation of the costs and rewards to attempt to achieve fairness

52
Q

realignment

A

Revision of perceptions of costs and rewards eg infidelity may now be accepted as the norm

53
Q

3 levels of rusbults investment model of commitment

A

• satisfaction level
• quality of alternatives
• investment size

54
Q

Satisfaction level

A

A satisfying relationship is when the outcome (rewards - costs) of a relationship surpasses the comparison level

55
Q

Quality of alternatives level

A

In the social exchange model this is coined comparison of alternatives ( CLalt) and is a judgement about whether an alternative partner would bring more rewards and fewer costs

56
Q

Investment level

A

The resources associated with a romantic relationship which the partners would lose if the relationship were to end

57
Q

Intrinsic investment

A

The care and love (emotive) that is given and received - from within you

58
Q

Extrinsic investment

A

The practical elements (house)

59
Q

What does ducks model suggest

A

Duck’s (2007) phase model suggests that the breakdown of a relationship is not a single event, but rather a system of stages or phases which a couple progress through which incorporate the end of the relationship.

60
Q

Ducks stages of relationship breakdown

A

→ Intra-psychic phase
→ Dyadic phase
→ Social phase
→ Grave-dressing phase

61
Q

Intrapsychic stage

A

● This is when a person admits to himself or herself that they are dissatisfied with their relationship
● They spend time thinking about the pros and cons of the relationship and possible alternatives
● This stage focuses on a person’s internal thought process that occurs before confronting the partner

● They reach a threshold of thinking ‘I can’t stand this anymore’

62
Q

Dyadic stage

A

● This occurs when a person confronts their partner and voices their dissatisfaction
● This can take places over days or weeks
● Discussions will often focus on the equity in the relationship

● The threshold that is reached at this stage is: ‘I would be justified in withdrawing’.

63
Q

Social stage

A

● Once the conflict reaches this stage, it is more difficult for a couple to mend their relationship
● Friends and family will take sides, intervene in the couple’s relationship and offer advice, which makes reconciliation much more problematic.

● The threshold at this stage is ‘I mean it’. The social phase usually leads to the dissolution of the relationship.

64
Q

Grave dressing stage

A

● Having left their partner, both sides construct their version of why their relationship broke down.
● They will minimise their faults and maximise their partners and at the same time trying to retain their social value and not lower their chance of attracting a new partner .
● This process is called ‘grave-dressing’ signifying the closure of the previous relationship and readiness to start a new one.

● The threshold here is, unsurprisingly, ‘It’s now inevitable’.

65
Q

Resurrection stage

A

They suggested that at this stage people move beyond the pain and distress associated with ending the relationship and experience personal growth.

66
Q

More self disclosure online

A
  • anonymity
  • don’t know your friends
  • time to think about what to say
  • less embarrassment
  • sexting
67
Q

Less self disclosure online

A
  • more editing
  • worry of blackmailing / trolling/ catfishing
68
Q

Reduced Cues Theory - Sproull and Kiesler (1986)

A

Reduced cues theory argues that self-disclosure is lower in CMC as cues e.g. appearance or cues to our emotional state are lacking and therefore communication less effective than FtF relationships.
The theory argues it can lead to a person being deindividuated which is losing their identify and acting in a way they would not normally.
This can lead to disinhibition which can involve aggressive and blunt communication and less self-disclosure.

69
Q

Hyperpersonal Model - Walther (1996)

A

The hyperpersonal model suggests that self-disclosure is higher in CMC as relationships are more personal than FtF.
CMC relationships can develop very quickly as self-disclosure happens earlier, so they become more intense and intimate.
They can also end more quickly and there is not the level of trust between partners.

70
Q

Key features of hyperpersonal self-disclosure

A

The sender of the message has greater control on what to disclose known as selective self-presentation, so they can present themselves in an idealised way. Self-disclosures can be intensely truthful (hyper-honest) and/ or intensely false (hyper-dishonest).

Anonymity - Another factor that promotes online self-disclosure is anonymity. When the other person does not know another’s identity, they feel less accountable for their behaviour, so they may disclose more

71
Q

What is meant by the absence of gating

A
  • a gate is any obstacle to forming a relationship.
  • FtF interaction is gated in that many features can interfere with the early development if a relationship.
72
Q

How does it affect the develop of relationships

A
  • the absence of gating is a huge benefit of CMC in that the online relationship may “get off the ground” in ways FtF situations may not.
  • Absence of gating works as you focus on self-disclosure rather than superficial and distracting features.
73
Q

How are parasocial relationships different from other relationships

A

Parasocial relationships are missing a key element normally present in relationships; they are not reciprocated.

74
Q

What is the CAS and the levels of it

A

Maltby et al (2006) used the Celebrity Attitude Scale which was developed by McCutcheon (2002) to identify three levels within parasocial relationships.
They include:
• Entertainment-social
• Intense-personal
• Borderline pathological

75
Q

Entertainment social level

A

→ Least intense level of celebrity worship
→ Celebrities viewing as sources of entertainment and fuel for social interaction e.g. people who enjoy TV series might also read about them online
→ Giles (2002) found that parasocial relationships were a fruitful source of gossip in offices

76
Q

Intense personal level

A

→ This is an intermediate level which reflects a greater personal involvement in a parasocial relationship with a celebrity
For example, people may consider Kim Kardashian as a soul mate

77
Q

Borderline pathological

A

→ This is the strongest level of celebrity worship, featuring uncontrollable fantasies and extreme behaviours
→ They may spend a large sum of money on a celebrity related object
→ May be willing to perform an illegal act

78
Q

The Absorption Addiction Model (McCutheon 2002)

A

This theory argues that parasocial relationships are an escape from life deficiencies like:
→ Poor sense of identity
→ Poor psychological adjustment
→ Lack of fulfilment in life
The ‘relationships’ allow an escape from reality to seek fulfilment.

There are two main components:
Absorption
An individual seeks fulfilment in a celebrity becoming preoccupied with them. They want to absorb some of what they lack e.g. beauty and then start to identify with them.
Addiction
The individual needs to increase their involvement (dose) to gain satisfaction. This could lead to extreme behaviours like delusional thinking e.g. stalking

79
Q

Attachment Theory explanation

A

Bowlby suggests that early relationships difficulties can lead to emotional troubles in later life which can be seen in parasocial relationships.
Ainsworth’s insecure attachments can also explain parasocial relationships:
• Insecure-resistants want their needs met where there is no threat of rejection and are therefore most likely to form parasocial relationships
• Insecure-avoidants avoid the pain of any rejection in any type of relationship so are unlikely to form any relationships including parasocial relationships