Relationship Development Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Triangular theory of love
- Intimacy, passion, commitment
- Liking, infatuation, empty love
- Companionate love, fatuous love, romantic love, consummate love

A

Intimacy - Emotional closeness, emotional component of love
Passion - Physical/sexual attraction, emotional drive component of love
Commitment - Desire to maintain long-term relationship, cognitive component

Companionate - Found in long and happy marriages (intimacy, commitment)
Fatuous - Deep love at first sight (passion, commitment)
Romantic - Beginning of relationship (passion, intimacy)
Consummate - All three

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Study: Intimacy and self disclosure
- 3 sets of questions, increasing in intensity
- Control did small-talk only
- Measured how close felt to partner

A

Exp condition reported greater closeness regardless of gender composition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Disclosure reciprocity

A

We like ppl who disclose personal info to us
Like ppl more after we disclosed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Communal vs exchange relationships

A

Communal: Benefits given non-contingently
- Family, friends, romantic partners

Exchange: Benefits given w/ expectation of receiving comparable benefit in return
- Colleagues, acquaintances, strangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Study: Is interpersonal attraction influenced by behaving in accordance with expected communal/exchange norms?
- Male Ps completed same task as attractive female confederate on monitor
- Told female was unmarried (communal) or married (exchange)
- P finished first and gets opportunity to send leftover materials to female, who either only gives thank you note (no benefit) or also gives one of her points (benefit)

  • Exp 2: P asked for return favour
A

Receiving benefit increased liking only for exchange relationship; No benefit increases liking for communal

Being asked for return favour increases liking in exchange condition only

Conclusion: We feel more positively others that behave in line with expected relationship norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intimacy process model

A

Look at pic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Responsiveness
- 3 components
- 3 benefits

A

Attentive and supportive recognition of one person’s needs and interests by another

  • Feeling understood
  • Feeling valued, respected, validated
  • Feeling cared for
  • Ppl who perceive relationship partner as more responsive feel closer, more satisfied, and more committed
  • Promotes intimacy by encouraging self-disclosure, trust, interdependency
  • Leads to secure relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Capitalization
- 2 components
- 4 benefits

A

Responding w/ enthusiasm or excitement when a partner/friend shares good news

  • One person shares good news w/ another
  • Other person responds w/ enthusiasm and excitement
  • Increases enjoyment/pleasure about event
  • Enhances relationship
  • Feel closer to person who enhances excitement
  • Relationship can be more satisfying and longer lasting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When we attribute motivation to a behav, it’s a guess- What’s this informed by?
What can undermine our understanding of what others mean?

A

Experience
Own motivations and desire

Lack of motivation
External influences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Study: Indirect effects of technology on communication
- Had discussion w/ stranger w/ phone vs black pocketbook and casual vs meaningful topic
- Tested for partner trust, partner empathy for self, relationship quality

A

No phone - More meaningful convos; higher trust, empathy, quality
- Presence of phone decreased effect

Conclusion: Presence of phone might prevent ppl reaping potential benefits of meaningful convos

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Study: Smartphones and real social interactions
- Groups ate meal at local restaurant w/ phone on tables vs phones silent and put away
- Completed questionnaire after on interest/enjoyment and boredom

A

W/ phone caused less interest/enjoyment and more boredom

Conclusion: Phone use undermined enjoyment ppl derive from real world social interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Study: Smartphones and social interactions
- Surveyed 5 times a day for one week; Asked how they were feeling over past 15 mins and what they had been doing (including how much smartphone use and whether activities included face-to-face interaction)
- Tested for interest/enjoyment; boredom, affect, connectedness

A
  • Interest/Enjoyment higher w/out phone
  • Boredom higher w/ phone
  • Affect more pleasant w/ out phone
  • Connectedness w/ others higher w/out phone

Phone use undermines the enjoyment ppl derive from real world social interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Find, remind, and bind theory of gratitude
- Promotes interpersonal bonds with partner

(Reading)

A

Gratitude…
Finds new or Reminds of a known good relationship partner
And helped Bind recipient and benefactor closer together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Social capital
- Bonding vs bridging capital

Social support
- Emotional, instrumental, informational

(Reading)

A

Bonding: Maintained thru interactions w/ similar patterns + focused on shared ideas, group membership
Bridging: Obtained from relationships w/ more heterogeneous partners + focused on gaining new resources

Emotional - Partners listen and talk about emotions (most closely linked to well being)
Instrumental - Tangible resources like assistance, services, material resources
Informational - Exchange of info about the enviro (advice, words of guidance)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly