Relations Between The Branches Flashcards
Explain the role and composition of the UK Supreme Court
- Opened in October 2009 following the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005 - repaced the Law Lords
- Consists of 12 members - e.g cases 2016/17 11 judges sat on the case over whether Parliament or the government should initiate the UK leaving the EU
- The Supreme Court hears appeals on points of law + makes decisions regarding government institutions
- The Lord Chancellor was a cabinet minister + the head of the judiciary responsible for appointing judges
- Appointments to the Supreme Court are made by an independent selection commission who recommend candidates whose then apporved or rejected by the Lord Chancellor
Explain how Judicial Appointments work
- They’re nominated by a 5 member independant Selection Commission + member of Judicial Appointments Commission
- The Lord Chancellor then confirms or rejects the nomination (cannot continue rejecting) - confirmed by PM + Monarch
- They must have served as senior judges for at least 2 years or been a qualified lawyer for at least 15 years - mandatory retirement at 75
Explain the type of cases the Supreme Court hears
- Supreme Court is the only UK wide court - final court of appeal for judgements made in lower courts
- Hears cases of significant public + constitutional importance
- Used to** interpret the application of EU law in UK**
- Rules as to whether devolved authorities have acted outside their powers
Explain why the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 was implemented
- Implemented due to concerns over the incomplete seperation of powers as the Law Lords sat in the HOL
-
Criticism of opaque system where senior judges as the Law Lords were apointed - there wasn’t an Appointments Commission it was often cronyism
** Failure to understand the distinction in roles** between the HOL + judicial functions - Now justicies aren’t automatically given peerages
Define judicial independence
- Principle that those in the judiciary should be free from political control or coercion - allows them to ‘do the right thing’ without fear of consequences
Define judicial neutrality
- Where judges operate impartially (without personal bias) in their judgements - essential due to rule of law
Explain how the Supreme Court exerts the Rule of Law
- Rule of Law = key doctrine of the UK constitution under which justice is guaranteed to all
- No one can be punished without trial
- No one is above the law + everyone is subejct to the same justice
- General principle of the constitution (e.g personal freedoms) results come from judges decisions not parliamentary statute
Explain how the Supreme Court exerts judicial independence
- ‘Security of tenure’ - means that judges have open-ended terms - so politicians cannot fire them for their behaviour
- Justices can only be removed through impeachment requiring a vote in both the HOC + HOL
- Guaranteed salaries from the consolidated funds -politicians cannot manipulate their salaries as a form of control
- Contempt of Court = offence - media, ministers etc are prevented from speaking publicy whilist legal proveedings are occuring - justices face no pressre from politicians
- Independant Appointments Commission = greater transparency in the proess
Explain how the Supreme Court exerts judicial neutrality
- Relative anonymity of senior judges- they’re allowed to avoid having to openly defend their ruilings
- Restriction on political activity -cannot campaign on behalf of a political party or pressure group - polticial views shouldn’t be public record
- Legal justification - judgements must be rooted in law not personal bias
- High-level training - judges training is regulated by the Law Society - minimum of 15 years as a barrister + 2 as a senior judge
Explain the threats to judicial independence
- Politicians criticise ruilings such as when Johnson criticised the Supreme Court ruiling that both his prorogations of Parliament were unlawful
- The Lord Chancellor (Justice Secretary) still gets one veto over each appointment
Explain the threats to judicial neutrality
- Narrow recruiting pool from which justices + senior judges are drawn from most of which are white,male,old + privately educated
- There has been an increasing politicisation of the judiciary e.g the Daily Mail labelling the High Court judges as ‘Enemies of the People’ over their Brexit ruiling
Define legal, political and national soverignty
- Sovereignty = final legislative authority + can act without undue external constraint
- National Sovereignty = idea that final decision-making authority located within the nation state e.g territory
- Legal/Political Sovereignty is supreme legal authority + the ability to exercise sovereignty in practice
Explain pro-Brexit sovereignty arguments and anti-brexity sovereignty arguments
Pro-Brexit:
* Legislation made by Parliament cannot be overturned by an external authority
* Parliament can legislate on any higher authority
* No Parliament can bind it’s successors
Anti-Brexit:
* Parliamentary sovereignty has been challenged with referendums = popular sovereignty
* EU Act 2011 introduced ‘referendum lock’ under which any future treaty transferring power from UK to EU
Explain what the Social Chapter is and the UK’s conflict with it
- Social Chapter; measures to protect rights of workers but Major opted out as the** didn’t want UK businesses to be held back by ‘red tape’ **
- New Labour signed up for the Social Chapter; right to annual leave, parental leave
- Coalition government made it difficult to claim for unfair dismissal from 1 year to 2 years
- **European Court of Justice **ruled that tradesmen travelling to a job had to count towards the **maximum 48 hour working week **- Cameron said this would **increase business leaders costs too much **
Explain the EU’s regulation on deep-sea fishing and the Factortame Case
- EU regulated quotas for deep-seat fishing + fishing boats to have access in all EU areas
- UK fishers said it would drive them out of business
- Factortame case sued UK government for restricting access to UK waters - ECJ ruled the 1988 Merchant Shipping Act wasn’t valid due to conflict with EU law (took precedent)