reading 4 Flashcards
Two main sets of methodologies is changing the way organizations do business in the current digital age:
big data analytics: data mining, machine learning and other statistical techniques allow practitioners to handle and analyze huge sets of data with a reasonable effort
Business field experiemnts: studies conducted outside of the lab by means of ease-to-use software allow managers to reliably answer causality questions at reasonable costs
When should I consider setting up a field experiment to answer my research or business questions
field experiments are one of the most reliable ways to test a theory or to prove that a business action results in a desired outcome
Findings from field experiments have direct implications for business operations. In the language of experimentation, we say that they generalize well and have high external validity. On the other hand, lab experiments are acknowledged to have higher internal validity
True experiments (either in the lab or the field) show three identifiable aspects
1) the responses of experimental subjects assigned to receive one treatment are compared to the responses of subjects assigned to another treatment (often a control gorup which receives some type of baseline treatment that is essentially no treatment or the state of the art condition. In the case of multivariate experiments, there are several treatment groups, which are all compared among each other
2) The assignment of subjects to each group is done through a randomization device such as a coin flip, a dice roll or algorithm
3) the manipulation of the treatment is under the control of an experimental researcher
Natural experiments
share attribute 1 and partially atrtribute 2 of t rue experiments since assignment is random or as if random. However in such cases, data comes from naturally occurring phenomena and therefore the manipulation of treatment variables is not generally under the reserachers control
Lab experiments
Participants are tested in an environment which is created by the researcher and which thus differs from reality. This unreal environment allows the experimenter to control other potential influences on the response but has the main drawback of making the respondent feel observed, which can lead to serveral kinds of response bias
Field experiments
in which the setting is an everyday life situation, often the exact same setting where the findings from the experiment will be deployed. IN most field experiments, participants are not even conscious of taking part in an experiment eliminating the risk of incurring a response bias
Key features of field experiments
authenticity of treatments, representativeness of participants, real world context, and relevant outcome measures
Causal effect:
the difference between tow potential outcomes, one in which a subject receives the treatment and the other in whic hthe subject does not receive the treatment
Experiments both in the lab and field provide unbiased estimates of the ATE when teh following assumptions are met:
1) random assignment: treatments are allocated such that all units have an equal probability between 0 and 1 of being assigned to the treatment group
2) excludability: the treatment must be defined clearly s otaht one can assess whether subjects are exposed to the intended treatment or to something else
3) noninterference: no matter which subjects the random assignment allocates to treatment or control, a given subjects potential outcomes remain the saem
Internal validity:
refers tot he extent to which we can say the observed effect in our study was caused by our treatment
Selection bias
when assignment to treatment is not random and certain types of people are more likely to receive one of the treatments, in other words, the experimental groups systematicall differ form each other
Differentia lattrition:
when certain types of subjects drop out of one of the treatments. it implies that certain types of participants leave during the run of the experiment or do not take part in the final measurement
Time effects
when treatments are administered at two different times, outside events, learningor other changes are confounded with the treatment
Confounding variables:
when other vairables are correlated with the treatment and have an effect on the outcome, a cause effect relationship between the confounder and the dependent variable can be mistakenly assumed to be a causal effect of the treatment
Noncompliance
subjects are assigned to the experiment do not get the specified treatment. THis can happend because of individuals voluntary decision to use a different treatment than the one they were assigned, because they do not like it or they think another treatment would be better