RAPHEX VII Flashcards
which of the following brachy isotopes cannot be produced in a reactor?
90Sr
103Pd
137Cs
192Ir
103Pd
it is proton rich and thus cannot be produced from borbadment of neutrons in a reactor
Isotop 228A goes through alpha and beta decay. Which of the following is not a possible daguther product?
228W
224X
222Y
220Z
222 Y
With alpha, would lose 4 nucleons, with beta don’t lose any nucleons
if scattering foil is left out, CAX dose will be?
> 50% too high
pencil beam
Does 6 MV or 15 MV require higher electron current to produce same dose rate?
6 MV requires more
because Bremss more efficient at high E, so more current is required at low energy
why does photon mode require more current than electron mode?
Bremss efficiency is always <1 and many photons are attenuated
-much more current needed
For electron beam where does most of the xray contamination come from?
jaws and electron cones
(made of high Z and much thicker than scattering foil)
A 10 MeV photon undergoes a Compton interaction and the scattered photon is emitted perpendicular to the direction of the incident photon. What is the approximate energy of the scattered photon?
0.511 MeV
-backscattered photons approach half of this value
Do FFF beams deliver higher dose rate than conventional beams for all FS?
No, only for small FS
-dose is higher at CAX but not higher than conventional on beam edges
If the FF is not centered properly, the beam will:
-be unflat, asymmetrical, and have slightly different PDD due to differences in beam hardening
absorbed dose in fat vs muscle vs bone at 6 MV and 20 MV
6 MV- Compton dominates- bone- muscle fat (fat has highest electron density)
20 MV- PP- fat-muscle-bone (bone has high Z)
portal dosimetry using EPIDs refers to all of the following except:
a.dose profile measurement
c. IMRT QA
b. patient position verification
d. MLC alignment verification
e. fluence distribution map
c- this is not portal dosimetry
which of the following is not a measure of plan quality?
isodose distributions conforming to PTV
meeting clinical dose constraints for normal tissues
beam arragement
total number of monitor units
MU is not quality
not sure I agree..
The relationshio between HU and electron density is approximately linear for most tissues except:
bone
lung
air cavities
muscle
bone
CT images are largely dependent on PE whereas therapy dose calcs are based on Compton
-first order CT numbers of most tissue scale linearly with density, but because of high calcium content, bone will deviate from this trend, giving higher CT values than appropriate for use in RT planning
-most TPS do this conversion automatically
All of the following are advantages of a dynamic wedge over a physical wedge, except:
a. approximately same CAX as open beam
b. field height is not limited
c. therapists do not have to lift a heavy wedge
d. less dose outside the field
e. wedge transmission factor is independent of field width
e
for dynamic wedge, the effective wedge transmission decreases with increasing field size since more beam modulation and hence more monitor units are required. This is similar to needing a thicker physical wedge with lower transmission factor for larger field widths
for the same delivered dose, which statement is false?
a. dynamic wedge are higher than for an open field
b. physical wedge are higher than for open field
c. universal wedge are higher than for open field
d. dynamic wedge are higher than for physical wedge
d
wedged field is always more MU than open field
MUs fur dynamic wedges are lower than for either a physical or universal wedge because the latter 2 objects are both thick metal objects placed in the beam
when treating a 3 field chestwall using mono-isocente,r which of the following is true:
a. collimator rotation is needed
b. couch kick awat from gantry needed
c. couch kick toward gantry needed
d. beam splitter needed
d
beam splitter eliminates beam divergence- doesn’t require couch or collimator rotation to achieve field match
A prostate cancer has a defibrillator/pacemaker. They decide to use 6 MV instead of 18 MV. Which statement best describes the effects of using the 6 MV beam?
a.total MUS are lower for 6 MV plan
b. in-field hot spot close to skin will be lower for 6 MV plan
c. 6 MV high isodoses will conform better to shape of prostate
d. none of the above
c
electrons have shorter range, thus it is easier to control shape of isodose lines
when treating s 0.6x0.4 cm2 tumor with 6 MV electrons, which of the following is true?
a. Pb mold should be shaped tightly to lesion size without margin
b. no bolus required
c. isodose lines will lie closer to patient surface than for a larger field
d. MU will be lower than for an unblocked field
c- isodose line constriction
the skin dose for a 6 MeV electron beam is lower than for a 15 MeV beam because for the 6 MeV beam there is..
less range straggling
-when normalized total electron fluence, the skin dose is actually the same for the 2 energies. But for the lower energy beam there is less range straggling, meaning that dmax dose is higher. Therefore, dose relative to dmax appears lower for 6 MeV beam