Raine Flashcards
what was the aim?
to see the difference in brain structure between murders pleading not guilty through insanity and non-murderers
what was the sample/participants?
41 murderers and 41 control group
what was the procedure?
1-ppts carried out practice test-visual targeting test
2-10 mins later injected with a tracer then completed visual targeting test again
3-32mins later PET scan was carried out to see how active brain had been when doing tasks
what controls were used?
-looked at whether left/right handedness was significant-wasn’t
what were the results?
CORTICAL:
-prefrontal lobe-lower glucose metabolism in murderers
-Parietal lobe- lower glucose metabolism in murderers
occipital lobe-higher glucose metabolism in murderers
SUB-CORTICAL:
-Amygdala-low levels in left but high levels in right
Thalamus-greter right thalamic activity
what were the conclusions?
- areas that had abnormal activity-due to lower self control/increased aggression
- murderers brains significantly different to non-murderer’s brains
GENERALISABILITY?
+41 is large sample for these kinds of studies make the results ore representative to these contexts
-not a large sample overall and ppts mean that reults can’t be generalised to large population
RELIABILITY?
+standardised procedure-same timings-same machines
APPLICABILITY?
-the ppts uniqueness (plead insanity) can’t apply to other types of criminals or other types of murderers
VALIDITY?
-some characteristics of ppts couldn’t be matched in the controls increasing ID-lowering validity
+matched pairs does reduce ID making more valid
-low ecological validity-scanning process
-subjective interpretation on som PET scan results
ETHICS?
- informed consent and withdrawal may have been limited as prisoners have little power
- injected-lack of protection from harm
- off meds for 2 weeks-lack protection from harm
what were the ppts matched on?
sex,age,gender, 6 had schizophrenia
how many of the ppts were women?
2
what design measure was used?
matched pairs design
what is this study classed as?
classical study