quiz 8 Flashcards
ch 6
group
a collection of people who have something in common, and believe their commonality is significant. Groups have tremendous power and influence over us.
3 characteristics:
- Interact with one another
- Share goals, norms, interests (commonality)
- Sense of “we” awareness
subgroups
create a buffer between us and the larger society (the largest group), fulfill sense of intimacy and integration. As society changes (because of technology), so does the nature and types of its subgroups
primary groups
- Cooley
- small, informal social group.
- family is first primary group
- Brought together by personal, long lasting, and meaningful relationships and maintained through face-to-face interaction w/ significant others.
- Serve our expressive (psychosocial) needs
- They set foundation for sense of self, and we internalize the viewpoints/orientations of the primary group.
secondary groups
- cooley
- Large, formal and goal-oriented groups that serve instrumental needs.
- Weaker emotional ties w/i these groups, more impersonal. Temporary relationships
- Spend most of our time w/ secondary groups. Because of our psychosocial/emotional needs, secondary groups tend to break down into primary groups
George Simmel
Sociologist, studied effects of group size– group size effect, dyads, triads
the lower the group size -> lower stability, higher intimacy and vice versa
group size effect
Simmel. the effects of group number on group behavior independent of the personality characteristics and opinions of the members themselves.
triadic segregation
tendency for triads to segregate into a pair, or coalition of the dyad, against the isolate. if the isolate then chooses to form a coalition w/ one of the pair, that’s tertius gaudens, a Latin term meaning “the third one gains.”
asch experiments
- There were lines on a card, and groups were asked which line is shorter. Even when the answer was obvious, when people gave the wrong answer, 1/3 to 1/2 would conform and adopt the wrong answer. showed power of group conformity/peer pressure
milgram experiment
Looked at how people conform to authority. People volunteered to be teachers, and people who were “in” on the experiment would be the student. Teachers were instructed to administer an electrical “shock” the student when they got the answer wrong. Student would start screaming as voltage rose, but most “teachers” continued to increase bc Milgram in lab coat (status symbol as authority) encouraged them. Result: 50-65% of people are willing to inflict harm on others when instructed to do so by an authority, across race and gender
reference groups
any group (to which one may or may not belong) used by the individual as a standard for evaluating her or his attitudes, values, and behaviors.
attribution theory
- W.I. Thomas
- the principle that dispositional attributions are made about others (what the other is “really like”) under certain conditions, such as out-group membership
- people view in-group members favorably, and out-group favors unfavorably
- attribution error: error made in attributing the causes for someone’s behavior to their membership in a particular group, such as a racial group.
origin of “six degrees of separation”
milgram ran an experiment where they asked a group of nebraskans to mail a document to a boston stockbroker (a specific one, but they didnt know who) by sending it to someone they might think know them. avg it took 6.2 ppl, hence we are all “6” degrees separated
groupthink
the tendency for group members to reach a consensus at all costs.
risky shift
the tendency for group members, after discussion and interaction, to engage in riskier behavior than they would while alone.
deindividuation
- the feeling that one’s self has merged with a group.
- it’s a group size effect. As groups get larger, trends in risk-taking are amplified.