Quiz 4 Questions Flashcards

1
Q

Discussion:

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

G.R. No. 170631

1) What are the two (2) rules that are in conflict in this case?

A

First, Article 2180’s specification that “[e]mployers shall be liable for the damages caused by their employees . . . acting within the scope of their assigned tasks[.]”

Second, the operation of the registered-owner rule that registered owners are liable for death or injuries caused by the operation of their vehicles.

These rules appear to be in conflict when it comes to cases in which the employer is also the registered owner of a vehicle. Article 2180 requires proof of two things: first, an employment relationship between the driver and the owner; and second, that the driver acted within the scope of his or her assigned tasks. On the other hand, applying the registered-owner rule only requires the plaintiff to prove that the defendant-employer is the registered owner of the vehicle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

G.R. No. 170631

2) If the registered owner of the vehicle is the employer, will Article 2180 apply?

A

Therefore, the appropriate approach is that in cases where both the registered-owner rule and Article 2180 apply, the plaintiff must first establish that the employer is the registered owner of the vehicle in question. Once the plaintiff successfully proves ownership, there arises a disputable presumption that the requirements of Article 2180 have been proven. As a consequence, the burden of proof shifts to the defendant to show that no liability under Article 2180 has arisen. This disputable presumption, insofar as the registered owner of the vehicle in relation to the actual driver is concerned, recognizes that between the owner and the victim, it is the former that should carry the costs of moving forward with the evidence. The victim is, in many cases, a hapless pedestrian or motorist with hardly any means to uncover the employment relationship of the owner and the driver, or any act that the owner may have done in relation to that employment. The registration of the vehicle, on the other hand, is accessible to the public.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

G.R. No. 170631

3) Where can you find a statutory provision of the “registered owner” doctrine?

A

There is no statutory provision of the “registered owner” doctrine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

G.R. No. 147437

4) Will a contributory negligence of the other driver in a criminal case of reckless driving a valid defense? Explain.

A

Moreover, in a prosecution for reckless or dangerous driving, the negligence of the person who was injured or who was the driver of the motor vehicle with which the accused’s vehicle collided does not constitute a defense. In fact, even where such driver is said to be guilty of a like offense, proof thereof may never work favors to the case of the accused. In other words, proof that the offended party was also negligent or imprudent in the operation of his automobile bears little weight, if at all, at least for purposes of establishing the accused’s culpability beyond reasonable doubt. Hence, even if we are to hypothesize that Arnold was likewise negligent in neglecting to keep a proper lookout as he took a left turn at the intersection, such negligence, contrary to petitioner’s contention, will nevertheless not support an acquittal. At best, it will only determine the applicability of several other rules governing situations where concurring negligence exists and only for the purpose of arriving at a proper assessment of the award of damages in favor of the private offended party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

G.R. No. 147437

5) If two vehicles arrive at an intersection at approximately the same time, which vehicle has the right of way to enter the intersection first?

A

Nevertheless, the right of way accorded to vehicles approaching an intersection is not absolute in terms. It is actually subject to and is affected by the relative distances of the vehicles from the point of intersection. Thus, whether one of the drivers has the right of way or, as sometimes stated, has the status of a favored driver on the highway, is a question that permeates a situation where the vehicles approach the crossing so nearly at the same time and at such distances and speed that if either of them proceeds without regard to the other a collision is likely to occur. Otherwise stated, the statutory right of way rule under Section 42 of our traffic law applies only where the vehicles are approaching the intersection at approximately the same time and not where one of the vehicles enter the junction substantially in advance of the other.

Whether two vehicles are approaching the intersection at the same time does not necessarily depend on which of the vehicles enters the intersection first. Rather, it is determined by the imminence of collision when the relative distances and speeds of the two vehicles are considered. It is said that two vehicles are approaching the intersection at approximately the same time where it would appear to a reasonable person of ordinary prudence in the position of the driver approaching from the left of another vehicle that if the two vehicles continued on their courses at their speed, a collision would likely occur, hence, the driver of the vehicle approaching from the left must give the right of precedence to the driver of the vehicle on his right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

G.R. No. 147437

6) What is the measure of a motorist’s duty of care while driving on a highway?

A

Keyword: Commensurate

All told, it must be needlessly emphasized that the measure of a motorist’s duty is such care as is, under the facts and circumstances of the particular case, commensurate with the dangers which are to be anticipated and the injuries which are likely to result from the use of the vehicle, and in proportion to or commensurate with the peculiar risk attendant on the circumstances and conditions in the particular case, the driver being under the duty to know and to take into consideration those circumstances and factors affecting the safe operation of the vehicle which would be open to ordinary observation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Notes:

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly