Questions testing critical thinking (including ethics) Flashcards
In what ways can doctors promote good health other than through direct treatment of an illness ?
They can promote good health by setting a good example for patients - keeping fit, not smoking and eating healthily.
can have posters up in their surgery.
during consultations, encouraging patients to have a healthy lifestyle.
advice on disease prevention - screening programmes and immunisation campaigns and services
How does politics influence healthcare decisions ?
The political determinants of health care - poor environmental conditions, inadequate transportation, unsafe neighbourhoods, and lack of healthy food options - affect all other dynamics of health.
politics has a major impact on the delivery of healthcare
- working hours
- funding
- pay rises - has led to strikes
- being understaffed - has led to strikes
These are all political decisions, i won’t act as if i know exactly what parties are involved etc but these things are the governments decision as the NHS is public, therefore politics will also play a role
Do you think it is right to allow private healthcare to run alongside the NHS ?
In favour :
- private healthcare takes patients away from the NHS waiting lists, in the news that the backlogs are months long. this is both beneficial to the patients and the NHS as treatments can be diverted into the private sector and this would ease strain on the NHS
- some doctors also have high ambitions and want to supplement their income through private work. if this wasn’t a possibility a lot of doctors would leave medicine or leave the country and practice elsewhere
- NHS can’t cope with all the demands because of budgetary constraints
- There is a fundamental issue of personal liberty and individual choice too, private should always be available to them if they need it
Against :
- private healthcare mainly benefits the wealthier part of the population - leads to inequality
- private healthcare is financially driven therefore you could argue about the motivation of the doctor which may not be altruistic
give my own opinion - private should run alongside it
How should healthcare be funded ?
There is no right or wrong answer to this but i believe the way its done in the UK is fair - there is a mixed market economy type of style to it
taxation is used to fund NHS which is our public health service but at the same time there is also private healthcare available which can be used by the people who can afford it.
One thing i would say and most people will agree with is that the NHS is underfunded and understaffed - however that is not a problem with the idea behind the system but is a problem with the government and politics. you don’t see this problem in sweden which is also publicly run and funded by taxes - but the state of their healthcare service is a lot better than ours - our problem lies with the government and politics
What do you think of the way that doctors are perceived in the media ?
positive
- heroic events such as the role of doctors in the aftermath of tragic events
- covid response and how the uk dealt with that
- documentaries and tv programmes showing all the amazing feats that doctors have accomplished
negative
- Dr shipman killing numerous patients, major scandals as such don’t give doctors a good name
- one main thing that is very recent is the fact that they are perceived negatively because they go on strike to defend pay rights when public perception is that they are very highly paid.
- Media can affect trust in doctor patient dynamics, patients may not believe things that doctors say because they watched or heard something different on social media - shouldn’t be the case but unfortunately it is
media plays an important role in influencing peoples decisions on doctors, normally the media portrays things that will make them money and often sensationalise stories therefore most of the time they only portray negative things. however, i believe people should use personal experiences with doctors to decide their opinions on what medicine really is
What does ‘inequalities in healthcare” mean to you ?
there are both socio economic and geographical inequalities in healthcare
socioeconomic - available services may not be used to their optimum by people in vulnerable groups that can’t afford it
geographical - people in urban areas have easier access to healthcare facilities
inequality in both private and public healthcare - wealth gap can affect the quality of healthcare that people receive
what are the arguments for and against people paying for their own healthcare ?
for
- would introduce competition on the doctor level and therefore could lead to increased quality of care
- may encourage people to have a healthier lifestyle so they don’t have to pay for it
- would prevent time wasting patients, people will only go if they have to
against
- place the poorest at a clear disadvantage
- may put people off from going to the doctors because they don’t want to pay
- patients with chronic illnesses will be paying all their lives and it will be very expensive - should be subsidised and paid for (only chronic illnesses)
- may lead to a black market in healthcare practices - unregulated and dangerous for patients
What are alternative medicines ? What is your opinion of them ?
hypnosis, crystals, acupuncture, homeopathy etc
for
- many therapies do not involve taking substances into the body therefore it is less likely that there will be side effects, whereas medicines can have side effects
- When conventional medicine isnt working, alternative therapies can offer further hope - DAD MIGRAINE HOMEOPATHY
against
- there isnt much evidence backing alternative medicines compared to conventional medicine
- conventional medicine rests on scientific principles of pathophysiology whereas alternative medicines don’t
- alternative therapies are poorly regulated, can lead to the abuse of trust of patients
Do you think the NHS should provide alternative therapies ?
it depends on whether the NHS can get around all the negative aspects of it
- If they find evidence that can back alternative medicine working then yes
- conventional medicine rests on scientific principles of pathophysiology whereas alternative medicines don’t
- If they can regulate them and can ensure no patient abuse is taking place
Should the NHS deal with patients who have self inflicted diseases ?
first define what a self inflicted disease is - lung cancer because of smoking, obesity because of eating habits, liver cirrhosis because of drinking habit etc
yes they should deal with them
- most of us will need to see a doctor for an issue that will bear some relation to our lifestyle, public perception of NHS would be bad if they didnt
- some self inflicted behaviours may reveal underlying health issues that may need to be identified and treated
e.g. self harm could reveal underlying depression etc
no we shouldn’t deal with them
- patients with self inflicted diseases often relapse, strain on NHS resources if they continually do this.
- Resources are scarce, we should prioritise how budgets should be allocated and where the money should be spent
ultimately it is down to society to decide how it wants to use its health system and if it wishes to refuse treatment to individuals whose diseases are or appear to be self inflicted, then so be it - justice also creeps in - we should treat everyone equally and a core principal of the NHS is to provide free care to those that need it
How do you go about researching something you know nothing about ?
give my own example with CAD and how i researched about it because it interested me
- read simple articles and texts on it
- read about what it is, how it can be prevented, what the treatments are, what can cause it
- watched youtube videos surrounding these mentioned things
Should the NHS fund non essential surgery ?
first need to define what non essential surgeries are
yes fund
- can have psychological effects on an individual even if they look like they’re not necessary
- people may start to self fund surgeries if NHS doesn’t and this can be financially difficult for them
no don’t fund
- if non essential surgery is funded, people may look to find problems that they never paid attention to before - breast enlargement because she feels she may aswell have it. to prevent this we shoudlnt fund it - it wastes NHS resources
- kind of like the free rider problem, people take advantage of it because no one has to pay for it. as soon as it gets to paying for it, it deters people from using it
How do you solve the problem of transplant organ shortages ?
- people should carry organ donor cards with them
- impose that everyone should be a donor - ethical issues will arise tho - autonomy plays a part too - make everyone be a donor and those who do not want to can let the government know and opt out - opt out scheme
- This is already a thing so it may not have too much of an effect
Deceased donor organs Should be Automatically Available
Giving one’s organs after death with the possible consequence of saving someone’s life is arguably within one’s duty of beneficence. If morality demands anything, it demands that we make a very small sacrifice for the significant benefit of others
- Financial incentives
Why do you think it is that we cannot give a guarantee that a medical treatment or surgical procedure will be successful ?
patient linked factors
- if the patient doesn’t confide in the doctor and tell them everything when history taking the proposed procedure may not be suitable
- patient may not respond to the procedure
- patient may not adhere to the medical treatment or take the medication
doctor linked factors
- doctor may have made the wrong diagnosis
- surgeon may not be fully competent during the procedure or afterwards, making it difficult for them to deal with adverse consequences
- not all treatments work on all people e.g paracetamol may or may not work on a person
What do you think would be the advantages and difficulties of a person with a major physical disability wanting to become a doctor ?
advantages
people whose disability affects one of their senses benefit from the fact that another one of their senses is more developed
blind people have also often developed an ability to retain, analyse and process information efficiently - could prove useful in a medical career - in diagnosis and as a clinician
disadvantages
a blind person may not be able to examine a patient in depth and spot important clinical signs without the help of a colleague (that colleague could be doing something more important) , they may also not be in the right position to ensure that they are administering the correct drug at the right dosage
a person who cannot walk would find it difficult to attend to a patient in an emergency
What are the advantages and disadvantages of admitting when a mistake is made ?
advantage
- you can repair the mistake more quickly because you have people around you that can help
- you can openly identify areas of improvement
-people would be grateful for your honesty, it will encourage them to have more trust in you in the long run
disadvantages
- colleagues may lower their opinion of you
- decrease in trust towards you and/or the medical profession
Do you think it is right for doctors to have study material sponsored by pharma or corporate sponsors ?
yes
- education budgets are small and this deters doctors from paying out of their own pocket to study so they are more likely to study
- allows greater relationship building with the industry
no
- sponsors might only support speakers who are biased in their favour - always a risk of corruption
- doctors may feel obliged to prescribe certain drugs rather than others as a result
it is right - but in moderation / if NHS had more funding then it wouldn’t be needed - again a problem with funding and the government