Questionnaire Design Flashcards
Lack of precision/reliability in measurements
random error – loss of statistical power; wider confidence intervals
Lack of accuracy/validity in measurement
systematic error (bias) which will not be mitigated by increased sample size or repeat measurements; must change study design/procedures
Principals of questionnaire design
Appropriate: able to provide answers to the research question/s
Intelligible: the respondent can understand (language, level of education etc.)
Unambiguous: the question means the same thing to the respondent and the inquirer
Unbiased: you are no more likely to elicit one kind of response than another (recall, social desirability etc.)
Capable of coping with all possible responses: omni-competent (try to anticipate possible answers; don’t know option)
Well-coded (for data capture & analysis): check for ambiguity & overlap
Ethical: informed consent, sensitivity (Autonomy, Beneficence etc.)
Piloted:
1. assess performance of tool
2. iron out design faults
Short and simple as possible
Logical sequence
Maximize response rate (majority of those eligible participate: representative sample)
Minimize missing data: avoid blanks, ‘other’, text is difficult
Good & well thought out data collection = high quality data = easier analysis & interpretation = useful conclusions
Justify your choices – tools, questions, scores
Pros of interview administered questionnaire
Ensures good completion of questions, interviewer can re-explain certain terms, participant does not need to be literate, researcher can develop a good rapport with the participant (+++this aids in removing any fears the participant may have
10 steps of questionnaire development
- Research Question, Objectives & Study Design
- What data will you need to collect? Variables
- Map out key data elements
- Select method of administration
- Develop the questions
- Anticipate the responses
- Format the questionnaire
- Coding
- Maximize validity & reliability
- Pilot
- Ethics
Cons of interview administered questionnaire
Cons: Time consuming, interpersonal factors can affect data collection (i.e. elderly researcher interviewing adolescent females about contraception), if interviewer does use a standardized method for administration- variation can arise and impact data quality and also more expensive
Pros of self- administered questionnaire
: Good strategy for completion of sensitive information (i.e. adolescent health surveys), less time consuming {could use an audio-recorded questionnaire on a Tablet, could make format of questionnaire more visually appealing than paper copy}
Cons of self- administered questionnaire
Participant must be literate, questionnaires must be clear and well laid out, lack of skip patterns/direction/explanation can impact completion of the questionnaire
2 types of question structure
- open ended
-close ended
pros of open ended question
Can be used when there are an extensive list of possible options (good for exploratory work)
cons of open ended question
Time-consuming to read and categorize, responders can get confused as to how to answer these
pros of close ended questions
Less time spent coding and analyzing, shortens the interview
cons of close ended questions
Responses could be limited depending on researcher’s knowledge
Include all reasonable responses & response options should be mutually exclusive
Tips
- home language
-simple, short, specific - avoid technical and imprecise terms
- could use visuals or graphics
- include reference frames to avoid confusion
- avoid double barreled questions
- avoid leading/ emotional language
- use text boxes for explanations of key words
Reliability/precision:
-The questionnaire delivers consistent results
-Standardize data collection procedures
-Train interviewers
-Supervise data collection
-Test-retest reliability: administer to same subjects after brief interval