QA processes Flashcards

1
Q

Rationale for QA in RT

A
  • reduced random and systematic errors across all steps in process (improves dosimetric and geometric accuracy)
  • increases probability that errors will be recognised and rectified sooner, reducing consequences for patient treatment
  • allows reliable inter-comparison of results among different centres
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is intercomparison important

A

Enhances accuracy or treatment
Highlights any deviations between machines, departments or techniques

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Role of RT in QA

A

ASMIRT and MRPBA

Demonstrates a thorough knowledge of quality assurance (QA procedures)
➢ Knowledge and application of procedures used in QA, and follows
department policies and procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

LINAC calibration protocols (national/international standard)

A

TRS 398 protocol

  • AAPM –TG51 protocol
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

MDT in QA

A
  • Radiation oncologists (ROs),
  • Medical physicists,
  • Radiation Therapists
  • Nurses,
  • Service engineers,
  • Admin staff,
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is QA

A

Quality assurance (QA) - all those planned and systematic
actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that a
product or service will satisfy the given requirements for
quality.
➢ QA- addresses a range of procedures, activities, actions, and
groups of staff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is QSM

A

Quality System Management (QSM)– is the management of a
QA program

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Quality control

A

QC includes activities that impose specific quality on a process. It entails the evaluation of
actual operating performance characteristics of a device or a system, comparing it to desired goals
and acting on the difference.

(b) Is the regulatory process through which the actual quality performance is measured, compared
with existing standards, and the actions necessary to keep or regain conformance with the
standards.

  • It is concerned with operational techniques and activities used:
    ➢ To check that quality requirements are met.
    ➢ To adjust and correct performance if the requirements are found not to have been met.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

QA in RT definition and Examples of QA

A

all procedures that ensure consistency of
the medical prescription, and safe fulfilment of that radiotherapy-related
prescription.

Examples of prescriptions:
➢ Dose to the tumour (to the target volume).
➢ Minimal dose to normal tissue.
➢ Adequate patient monitoring aimed at determining the optimum
end result of the treatment.
➢ Minimal exposure of personnel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

QA equipment programme

A
  1. Acceptance Testing and Commissioning
  2. Routine QC checks
  3. Additional QC checks
  4. Planned preventative maintenance (PM) program
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Acceptance testing vs comissioning

A

Acceptance Testing – Acceptance of equipment is the process in which the
supplier demonstrates the baseline performance of the equipment to the
satisfaction of the customer.

  • Commissioning - Commissioning is the process of preparing the equipment for
    clinical service.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Regular QC

A

begins immediately after commissioning

Parameters to be tested and the tests to be performed.
✓ Specific equipment to be used for that.
✓ Geometry of the tests.
✓ Frequency of the tests.
✓ Staff group or individual performing the tests, as well as
the individual supervising and responsible for the
standards of the tests
✓ Expected results.
✓ Tolerance and action levels.
✓ Actions required when the tolerance levels are
exceeded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

frequency of QC checks

A

daily, monthly and annual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

equipment of QC

A

Linac
✓ TPS
✓ RVs (R & V)
✓ RIS,
✓ PACs
✓ Hospital-based information systems
✓ QA equipment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ARPANSA role

A

Services include monitoring, Testing and Calibration, training and hire radiation
meters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Dosimetry Audits

A

The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service (ACDS)
* A national independent dosimetry auditing program, providing quality assurance
for radiation oncology facilities and patients.
* ACDS Staff - MPs, 2 RTs,

17
Q

Quality Audits definition

A

Quality audit is a systematic and independent
examination to determine whether or not quality activities and
results comply with planned arrangements and whether or
not the arrangements are implemented effectively and are
suitable to achieve the stated objectives.

18
Q

Quality Audits rationale

A

Evaluate the need for improvement or corrective
action if those standards are not met

19
Q

Quality audits characteristics and scope

A

Should be regular and form part of a quality feedback loop
to improve quality.
* Voluntary
* Regulatory
* Procedural or Practical
Scope:
1. Check Documentation
2. Check Measurements
3. Assess infrastructure

20
Q

Quality Audits example

A

Example: International QA
Audit
1. IAEA/WHO TLD audit
▪ Small TL dosimeters (0.5 cm in diameter
and 2.5 cm long) are distributed by mail
to the participants for irradiation and
upon their return, they are read in the
IAEA’s Dosimetry Laboratory
▪ Criteria- TLD results 5%
The RPLD capsule is positioned
at your usual SAD
2 Gy to centre (the RPLD capsule) is at 10
cm depth.

21
Q

ACDS

A

conducts audits
different levels of audits

22
Q

Level 1 audit

A

The Level I mail-out audit is an independent measurement
of linac output under reference conditions.
* Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeters (OSLDs) are
sent to a facility, irradiated, and returned to the ACDS for
analysis.
* All clinical photon and electron beams are included in the
audit.

23
Q

level 2 audit

A
  • once every 4 years
  • a diagnostic test of TPS performance
  • mail-out audit
  • independent measurement of Linac output under reference conditions
24
Q

level 3 audit

A
  • audit determines absorbed dose to water delivered to selected points within an anthropomorphic phantom
  • this is an end-to-end audit where the phantom undergoes all steps in the RT chain
25
Q

when to do TPS QA

A

new TPS
upgrades
periodic QA checks

26
Q

TPS QA - Checksum program

A

Monthly – e.g., performing checksums on beam data and executable files.
Rationale:
1. The program cannot be modified by the operators therefore it should be verified
that it has not been corrupted by any virus or wrong operations.
2. The beam data can be modified (e.g., new measurement more precise).
* If a virus corrupts programs or somebody makes a wrong operation on the system, a checksum
utility program pointing on the executables, beam data and other important files can identify the
problem

27
Q

forms of peer review

A
  • Physician-led case oriented: Radiation Oncologists-RTs, Physics (set-up differs)
  • Tumour Board: Multiple physicians and members of the healthcare team from
    diverse disciplines.
  • Chart Rounds
  • Members of the treatment team review each case (e.g., doses,
    fields, treatment plans, patient setup)
  • Morbidity and Mortality(M&M) rounds/case conferences: developed to provide a forum in which clinicians discuss adverse events in an
    attempt to improve patient safety and care
28
Q

Peer review - PRAT

A

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR)
Peer Review Audit Tool for Radiation Oncology (PRAT)
* Steps
1. Patient selection
2. Preliminary scoring of each case
3. Peer review meeting to discuss all cases and feed back to radiation oncologist
4. Subsequent re-audit of all cases where a change in management was discussed.
* QA committees

29
Q

Cumulative errors

A

From:
Unmitigated failure modes
Plan complexity
Adhoc procedure variations