Punishment Flashcards
Effects of Consequences:
- increase behavior – reinforced
- decreased behavior – punished
Two Ways of Punishing
- Add a stimulus – positive punishment
- Removed a stimulus – negative punishment
Two Key Points
- punishers are things we will escape or avoid given the opportunity
- punishers are defined by their effect on behavior
- if it doesn’t decrease the behavior, it’s not a punisher
-Contingency
-the degree of correlation between a behavior and its consequence
-Contiguity
- nearness of events in time (temporal contiguity) or space (spatial contiguity)
- the longer the interval, the slower the learning
- note: lower suppression ratio scores indicate more effective punishment
-Intensity
“all studies of the intensity of punishment have found that the greater the intensity of the punishing stimulus the greater the reduction of the punished responses.” (Azrin and Holz (1966) p. 396)
-Introductory Intensity of Punishment
-using an effective level of punishment from the beginning is very important
-Ethical considerations
- if punishment is to be used, it must be intense enough to suppress the behavior dramatically
- Risks if not doing this:
- Behavior does not get suppressed
- more instances of punishment are required
- greater (perhaps inhumane) intensities end up being required
- What is an acceptable level of intensity
- rule of thumb for self-modification: an effective punisher would be one you are not willing to inflict upon yourself (i.e., you would need a 3rd party to do it)
SBIS (self-injurious behavior inhibiting system)
if you self-injure, it will shock you every time that occurred. Now banned
-reinforcement of punished behavior
-effectiveness of the punisher is determined by effectiveness of the reinforcers maintain the behavior
-Alternative sources of reinforcement
- providing other means of obtaining the reinforcement that maintains the punished behavior will suppress the behavior more effectively
- behavior decreases more rapidly
- punishment may not be necessary
Problems with Punishment
- the use of punishment is often reinforcing to the person doing the punishment
- example: Classroom teacher who uses punishment successfully
- teacher might be praised for “running a tight ship”
- Negative reinforcement
- undesirable classroom behaviors such as talking disruptively, may stop with little effort (negatively reinforcing for the teacher)
-Escape and Avoidance
- punishment can induce escape and avoidance behaviors such as:
- struggling free
- hiding
- stealing
- cheating
- lying
-Aggression
- often a form of escape
- especially likely to occur when other means of escape is impossible
- negatively reinforced
- not always directed at the punishing source
- often is directed at inanimate objects
- opportunity to attack can be used as a reinforcer (vis-à-vis the Premack Principle)
-Apathy
- if no alternative behaviors are reinforced the organism may just “do nothing” at all and exhibit a malaise or apathy
- Doesn’t teach Acceptable Behaviors
- punishment only decreases behavior
- acceptable behaviors still need to be reinforced
-Abuse
- punishment often “gets out of hand” or is used in damaging and harmful ways
- e.g., corporal punishment that progresses in intensity
- negative punishment is generally preferred to positive punishment
- e.g., removing internet privileges to a misbehaving child
-Imitation of the Punisher
-children are prone to learn from adults and may use these techniques on others and into the future
Premack Principle
-for reinforcement:
high-probability behavior reinforced low-probability reinforcer
-piano (low prob.) -> Coffee
PP for punishment:
low probability behavior punished high probability behavior
-Coffee (high prob.) -> Piano
Respondent Conditioning
-Pavlov’s dogs
-Unconditional Stimulus (US) -> Unconditional response (UR)
- Conditional Stimulus (CS) -> Conditional Response (CR)
- Step 1 – make administration of the US contingent on presentation of the novel stimulus
- Neutral -> US -> (elicits) UR
- Step 2 – present the CS (formerly the novel stimulus) on its own
- Conditional Stimulus -> CR
Conditioned Concupiscence in Rats
- exposed make rats to a neutral odor (CS) and then a sexually receptive female rate (US)
- training
-Respondent conditioning
-the process of establishing a conditional probability between a CS and a US
-Respondent
- the response elicited by the CS
- respondent + conditional response
-a respondent is
a class of behavior that changes as a result of preceding stimuli (i.e., antecedents)
- the bell (antecedent)makes the dog salivate (behavior)
- the controlling event is a stimulus that precedes the response
-An operant is
class of behavior that changes as a result that follow it (i.e., consequences)
- the rat presses the lever (behavior) for food (consequence)
- the controlling event is a stimulus that follows the response
Phylogenetic Behavior
- behavior based on genetic endowment
- reflexes
- fixed/modal action patterns
- reaction chains
- habituation/sensitization
- unconditional reflex