Aversive Control Flashcards
Operant Antecedents
- Discriminative Stimulus (S^D)
- a stimulus or event that precedes an operant and sets the occasion for its reinforcement
- Extinction Stimulus (S^DELTA)
- A stimulus that precedes an operant and sent the occasion for its non-reinforcement
- Conditioned Aversive Stimulus (S^AVE)
- a stimulus or event that precedes an operant and sets the occasion for escape and avoidance
-Discriminative Stimulus (S^D)
-a stimulus or event that precedes an operant and sets the occasion for its reinforcement
-Extinction Stimulus (S^DELTA)
-A stimulus that precedes an operant and sent the occasion for its non-reinforcement
-Conditioned Aversive Stimulus (S^AVE)
-a stimulus or event that precedes an operant and sets the occasion for escape or avoidance
-Unconditional Aversive stimulus
- a stimulus or event that, as a function of species history, an organism escapes or avoids
- also called a “Primary Aversive Stimulus”
- phylogenetically important events that impact the “fitness” of an organism
- also called a “Primary Aversive Stimulus”
-Overcorrection (PP+)
- Form of positive punishment in which the individual has to engage in effortful behaviour contingent on the problem behaviour
- over correction because they have to engage in it many times
-Restitution (PP+)
-contingent on the problem behaviour, the individual is required to fix the environment disrupted by the problem behaviour
-Guided Compliance (PP+)
- a form of positive punishment in which, contingent on problem behaviour that occurs following a request, the individual is physically guided to comply with the request
- Positively punishes non-compliance
- Negatively reinforces compliance
- Positive reinforcement of compliance is easily the incorporated
-Positive Practice (PP+)
-contingent on the problem behavior the individual has to engage in correct forms of relevant behavior for a period of time
-Contingent Exercise (PP+)
- contingent on the problem behavior, the individual engages in some effort full behaviour for a specified period of time
- the effortful behavior is unrelated to the problem behaviour
-Physical Restraint (PP+)
- a form of positive punishment in which, contingent on the problem behaviour, the body part involved in the behaviour is held immobile for a specified period of time
- used in conjunction with response blocking
-Response Blocking (PP+)
- physically stopping a behaviour form being completed
- can prevent problems generated by the behaviour
- may prevent the behaviour form being reinforced
-Time-Out from Positive Punishment (NP-)
- a form of negative punishment in which loss of access to a positive reinforcement is contingent on a response
- In particular, time-out needs to prevent access to the reinforcer maintaining the problem behaviour
- time-out should be administered immediately
- physical guidance may be necessary
- there should be no means of escaping the time-out
- i.e., other reinforcers should not be accessible
-Response Cost (NP-)
- contingent on a problem behaviour occurring, a specified amount of reinforcer is removed
- if reinforcer loss is delayed the conditioned punishers should be employed to bridge the delay and provide an immediate consequence
- Conditioned punisher = speeding ticket
- Conditioned punisher = verbal statement
- need to consider what reinforcer(s) to remove and the magnitude of the removal
Aversive Activities vs Stimulation
- aversive/punishing simulation is rarely, if ever, used in behaviour modification or ABA
- Examples:
- Lemon juice (example in textbook)
- spray mist
- ice (bruxism example)
- Aromatic ammonia
- auditory stimulation (shouting or aloud noise)
- spanking
Relativity of Reinforcement
-Premack Principle for Reinforcement
- Part 1
- rats on fluid deprivation for 23hr
- obtained on probability of drinking water vs running on wheel
- more time was spent drinking water
- drinking = high prob., Running = low prob.
- water access was made contingent on running
- i.e. drinking used as consequences for running
- Result
- Running increased
- i.e. drinking functioned as a reinforcer for running
- Part 2
- rats given free water access
- obtained probability of drinking water vs running on wheel
- more time was spent running on wheel
- Drinking = low prob., Running = high prob.
- Wheel access was made contingent on water consumption
- i.e., running used as consequence for drinking
- Result
- Drinking increased
- i.e., running functioned as a reinforcer
Premack principle punishment
-low-probability behaviour punishes high-probability behaviour