Psychopathology: phobias Flashcards
Define phobias
A phobia is an intense, overwhelming and debilitating fear of an object, place, situation, feeling or animal. They are more prominent than fears and may lead to an individual organising their life around their phobia.
Phobias are a very common anxiety disorder and some estimates suggest between 15-20% of the population will experience a phobia.
To be diagnosed with the condition, typically the disorder must be interfering with day to day functioning and last longer than 6 months.
Emotional characteristics of phobias
How do you FEEL when you see your feared object?
Persistent, excessive, unreasonable fear - e.g., feeling terrified at the sight of a clown
High level of anxiety when anticipating the object - e.g., sweating and shaking when you know a clown is near by
Fear when presented with the object - e.g., trembling and crying when a clown appears
Behavioural characteristics of phobias
How do you BEHAVE when you see your feared object?
Panic attacks, crying, screaming, running away, freezing or clinging - e.g., when you see a clown
Avoiding the feared stimulus - e.g., not going to a circus
Disrupted everyday functioning - e.g., not able to go to any family fun events in case they have clowns
Cognitive characteristics of phobias
What do you THINK about your feared object?
Conscious awareness of exaggerated anxiety - e.g., knowing your trembling and crying is excessive
Paying selective attention to the feared stimulus - e.g., watching a film where there is a clown in a small picture and not being able to see anything else
Irrational beliefs - e.g., every clown is evil
Cognitive distortions - e.g., if I go outside the house, I will probably see a clown
Explaining phobias: two-process model
One of the best explanations of phobias comes from the behavioural approach, specifically classical and operant conditioning. These forms of conditioning basically state we learn behaviour through:
Association → ( classical conditioning) → acquisition of phobia
Consequences → ( operant conditioning) → maintenance of phobia
Mowrer (1947) suggested both of these processes are needed to develop a phobia, hence being called the two-process model.
ACQUISITION: CLASSICAL CONDITIONING
- UCS (danger / pain) = UCR (fear and anxiety)
- NS (stimulus pre-phobia) + UCS (danger / pain) = UCR (fear and anxiety)
- CS (phobic stimulus) = CR (fear and anxiety)
- UCS (pain of being bitten) = UCR (fear and anxiety)
- NS (dog) + UCS (pain of being bitten) = UCR (fear and anxiety)
- CS (dog) = CR (fear and anxiety)
MAINTENANCE: OPERANT CONDITIONING
Learning through reinforcement or punishment:
Positive reinforcement
- Positive reward for a behaviour → Increases repetition of behaviour
Negative reinforcement
- Behaviour avoids punishment→ Increases repetition of behaviour
Punishment
- Negative consequence for a behaviour→ Decreases repetition of behaviour
Describe stimulus generalisation
Stimulus generalisation can occur when this anxiety can become generalised to all similar objects/situations.
As the person avoids all dogs and places where dogs may be (like the park), this ultimately reduces their fear and anxiety through negative reinforcement, and can be referred to as higher order conditioning, because now parks have also been associated with the CS of dogs.
Describe higher order conditioning
hIgher order conditioning → when another neutral stimulus (the park) is paired with a conditioned stimulus (dogs) to produce the conditioned response (fear).
EVALUATING THE
BEHAVIOURIST EXPLANATION
OF PHOBIAS: evidence
STRENGTH #1
The theory has experimental support for explaining phobias.
Watson & Raynor (1920) conducted research on Little Albert in which they established… a phobia could be acquired through classical conditioning. First, the introduced Albert to a white rat (NS) and he was unafraid). They then repeatedly paired the rat (NS) with a loud noise (UCS) which caused a fear response (UCR). Eventually, Albert began to show fear (CR) to the white rat (CS) alone.
This supporting research gives an element of validity to the theory of environmental causes of phobic reactions. With the theory being more credible, this means it is more likely to inform more useful practical applications regarding the treatments of phobias.
EVALUATING THE
BEHAVIOURIST EXPLANATION
OF PHOBIAS: incomplete explanation
P: However, the explanation is significantly weakened by the fact that not all incidences of
trauma result in subsequent phobias.
E: This suggests there are elements of cognition that mediate the onset of phobia
development as some people experience traumatic events and do not have phobias.
E: For instance… many people may have have a traumatic incident with a wasp yet do not develop phobias.
L: This implies that the learning account of phobias is incomplete and has problems applying to real life
EVALUATING THE
BEHAVIOURIST EXPLANATION
OF PHOBIAS: practical applications
P: The theory has good practical application for treating phobias.
E: The explanation has helped devise useful treatments to unlearn phobias based on the
two process model…e.g. systematic desensitisation involves using classical conditioning to create new positive associations between a previously feared CS
E: i.e. to show relaxation and calm with the previously feared item
L: This illustrates that the explanation has helped society and the 20% of the population
that suffer phobias.
EVALUATING THE
BEHAVIOURIST EXPLANATION
OF PHOBIAS: environmentally reductionist
P: This theory could be argued to be environmentally reductionist.
E: The concept that complex and debilitating behaviour like phobias can be reduced down
to simple stimulus/response reactions could be breaking the behaviour down too much,
resulting in other relevant and applicable explanations.
E: For example… this would neglect to consider cognitive reasons for the onset of phobias as well as imitating powerful role models (e.g. parents)
L: Hence, the two process model of phobias may provide an incomplete explanation of
phobias.
EVALUATING THE
BEHAVIOURIST EXPLANATION
OF PHOBIAS: of ‘Biological preparedness’ may better explain phobias
than behaviourist explanations.
P: Alternative biological explanation of ‘Biological preparedness’ may better explain phobias
than behaviourist explanations.
E: This is because learning does not account for the fact that fears/phobias promoted
our survival and may still serve our interests to keep us safe, so it makes sense that we have
these phobias due to evolutionary reasons.
E: The kinds of fears/phobias that would have been of survival value would be…. ancient fears like scared of spiders, snakes and heights. This would serve an evolutionary advantage
L: This suggests that, the 2 process model offers only a partial incomplete explanation of phobias
EVALUATING THE
BEHAVIOURIST EXPLANATION
OF PHOBIAS: based on highly scientific principles