Memory: past paper questions Flashcards
A researcher investigated the working memory model using a laboratory experiment.
Forty students from a local college volunteered to take part.
In Condition A, 20 students performed the following two tasks at the same time:
* mentally counting backwards from 100
* tracking coloured shapes on a computer screen.
In Condition B, 20 different students performed the following two tasks at the same
time:
* mentally counting backwards from 100
* reading a poem out loud.
The researcher predicted that the performance of students in Condition A would be
better than the performance of students in Condition B.
0 4) Name the two components of working memory that would be involved in the performance
of the tasks in Condition A.
[2 marks]
Mentally counting backwards from 100:
Tracking coloured shapes on a computer screen:
Mentally counting backwards from 100 – Articulatory loop or store; phonological loop or store;
articulatory control processes.
Tracking coloured shapes on a computer screen – Visuo-spatial scratchpad/sketchpad/Inner
scribe/Visual cache.
Accept central executive/episodic buffer for either component, but not the same answer for both.
A researcher investigated the working memory model using a laboratory experiment.
Forty students from a local college volunteered to take part.
In Condition A, 20 students performed the following two tasks at the same time:
* mentally counting backwards from 100
* tracking coloured shapes on a computer screen.
In Condition B, 20 different students performed the following two tasks at the same
time:
* mentally counting backwards from 100
* reading a poem out loud.
The researcher predicted that the performance of students in Condition A would be
better than the performance of students in Condition B.
Briefly explain two ways in which the working memory experiment described above could
be improved.
[4 marks]
improving the sample/sampling method/target population – details of alternative method, eg
stratified
changing the design – use of an alternative design (repeated measures, matched pairs) and brief
details of how this would be implemented
changing the nature of the tasks – suggestions for tasks that are more reflective of real-life
behaviour, eg reading e-mails whilst talking on the phone, etc
changing the type of experiment – suggestions for alternative, eg field study – carry out the
research in a more natural setting, eg an office environment or a classroom
participants should be randomly allocated to each experimental condition; brief explanation of
how this would be done
Discuss one strength of the working memory model.
[4 marks]
evidence supports the existence of separate stores in STM, eg KF; brain scanning evidence, eg
Paulesu; dual-task performance, eg Baddeley et al. Evidence may be used to support general
principles of model or specific stores/sub-components
suggests STM is an active processor rather than the unitary ‘stopping-off station’ version
presented by the multi-store model
practical application, eg phonological deficits observed in dyslexia linked to articulatory loop
Describe the cognitive interview.
[6 marks]
reinstating the context – interviewee mentally reinstates the environmental and personal context
of the incident, eg sights, sounds, weather etc; (based on the principle of retrieval failure/cuedependent forgetting that cues may trigger recall)
report everything – interviewer encourages the reporting of every single detail of the event, even
though it may seem irrelevant; (such detail may trigger other memories)
changing order – interviewer tries alternative ways through the timeline of the incident; (reduces
possibility that recall may be influenced by schema/expectations)
changing perspective – interviewee recalls from different perspectives, eg how it would have
appeared to other witnesses; (reduces influence of schema)
features of enhanced cognitive interview to facilitate recall – focus on social interaction, reducing
anxiety/distractions, slow speech, use of open-ended questions
Aaron was upset as he left the Spanish exam. In the unfamiliar room and full of nerves,
his mind had gone completely blank. He was regretting studying both French and Spanish
because he was sure he had mixed up lots of the words.
0 8 Outline one explanation of forgetting. How might this explanation account for Aaron’s poor
performance in the Spanish exam?
[4 marks]
Retrieval failure (focus here must be on forgetting)
Forgetting is due to the absence of cues
Lack of external contextual cues – where environment for learning and recall is different (eg
different room)
Lack of internal contextual cues – where physical state for learning and recall is different (eg
mood)
Possible applications:
Aaron is not in the same context as when he learnt the material for his Spanish exam – ‘an
unfamiliar room’
Aaron is not in the same physical, emotional state as when he learnt the material – ‘full of nerves’
Full application marks can be awarded for one of the above in detail.
OR
Interference
when two memories conflict/confuse/become mixed up with each other
more likely when material is similar (creates response competition)
proactive interference – when an older memory disrupts a newer memory
retroactive interference – when a newer memory disrupts an older memory
Possible applications:
Aaron has mixed up/confused words from another subject which has caused him to forget
interference is likely in this case because French and Spanish are similar
Briefly evaluate the explanation of forgetting you have outlined in your answer to
Question 08.
[4 marks]
Retrieval failure
Possible evaluation points:
use of evidence, eg Godden and Baddeley suggests that retrieval failure/absence of cues is a
valid explanation of forgetting
application of explanation, eg improving memory using mnemonics, category headings
context has to be very different in real-life to have any effect
context effect only occurs when memory is tested in particular ways – free recall vs recognition
Accept other valid points.
OR
Interference
Possible evaluation points:
use of evidence from lab studies, eg McGeoch and McDonald and real-life, eg Schmidt supports
the effects of interference
application of explanation, eg avoiding similar material when revising for exams
use of artificial materials in lab studies, eg recall of word lists
deliberate attempt to induce interference in lab studies, eg by limiting time between learning and
recall
evidence suggests interference can be overcome using cued recall
interference tends not to occur with experts
Which two of A, B, C, D and E are associated with the cognitive interview technique?
Shade two boxes only.
[2 marks]
A Alter the perspective
B Change the speaker
C Match the direction
D Remove the context
E Reverse the order
A: Alter the perspective
E: Reverse the order
Evaluate the cognitive interview as a way of improving the accuracy of eyewitness
testimony.
[6 marks]
Possible evaluation points:
* use of evidence to support/challenge the effectiveness of cognitive interview (CI), e.g. Kohnken et al
(1999)
* although CI leads to more correct information, incorrect information also increases (although some
studies, e.g. Geiselman dispute this)
* some elements of CI may be more successful than others – Milne and Bull (2002)
* the success of CI may be related to the age of witness
* CI requires training and investment so it may not always be available because of limited resources
* credit evaluation of enhanced cognitive interview
* credit comparison with standard interview and enhanced CI
Most PIN code box s are 4 digits long and are easy to remember. In contrast, mobile phone
numbers are 11 digits long. Most people would not be able to remember a friend’s new
mobile phone number unless they were able to say it to themselves several times without
interruption.
0 8 Discuss the multi-store model of memory. Refer to the information above in your answer.
[16 marks]
Possible description:
- capacity, duration and coding of the separate stores – sensory register, short-term memory (STM),
long-term memory (LTM) - transfer processes between stores – attention and rehearsal
- rehearsal loop – maintenance in STM
- how information is lost from each store, e.g. decay/displacement
- information processing model – linear made up of unitary stores.
Credit an accurately annotated diagram.
Possible application:
- four-digit numbers are easy to remember as 7(+/–2) items is the average capacity of STM
- eleven-digit mobile numbers would exceed this limited capacity
- these longer mobile numbers can be recalled if people ‘say it to themselves several times’ which
implies maintenance in STM/transfer to LTM - interruption disrupts recall because it causes displacement from STM
- credit reference to ‘chunking’ and/or primacy-recency effect in this context
Possible discussion points:
* useful starting point for memory research, first model to incorporate three different stores
* evidence that supports the coding, capacity, duration of the three stores, e.g. Baddeley, Jacobs,
Sperling, Bahrick et al
* evidence that supports the functional separation of the stores, e.g. Glanzer and Cunitz
* evidence that challenges the unitary nature of STM and LTM, e.g. Shallice and Warrington
* evidence which suggests that rehearsal is not the only method of transfer from STM to LTM/
distinction between maintenance and elaborative rehearsal
* critical comparisons with alternative models, e.g. working memory.
Which type of long-term memory would be most associated with the following?
Write the correct type of long-term memory in the spaces provided.
0 5 . 1 Stored with reference to contextual information, eg time and place
[1 mark]
Episodic
Which type of long-term memory would be most associated with the following?
Write the correct type of long-term memory in the spaces provided.
Difficult to describe in words
[1 mark]
procedural
Which type of long-term memory would be most associated with the following?
Write the correct type of long-term memory in the spaces provided.
Knowing the meaning of a word
[1 mark]
semantic
A researcher investigated retrieval failure using an independent groups design.
In Condition A, 10 participants learnt 30 words and recalled them in the same room.
In Condition B, another 10 participants learnt the same 30 words in one room and
recalled them in a different room.
The results for Condition B are shown below.
Table 1
Participant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Number of words recalled 9 11 8 28 14 13 9 15 10 12
The researcher decided to use the mean to analyse the results.
State one advantage of an independent groups design.
[1 mark]
Possible advantages:
* removes order effects/effects of practise/fatigue etc
* participants are less likely to work out the aim and change their behaviour/less influenced by demand
characteristics.
A researcher investigated retrieval failure using an independent groups design.
In Condition A, 10 participants learnt 30 words and recalled them in the same room.
In Condition B, another 10 participants learnt the same 30 words in one room and
recalled them in a different room.
The results for Condition B are shown below.
Table 1
Participant 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Number of words recalled 9 11 8 28 14 13 9 15 10 12
The researcher decided to use the mean to analyse the results.
Suggest a more appropriate measure of central tendency for this data set and explain why
it would be more appropriate.
[3 marks]
1 mark for the median.
Plus
2 marks for a clear, elaborated explanation of why the median would be more appropriate for this data
set.
1 mark for a limited or muddled explanation, or no explicit reference to the data set.
Possible content:
* the median would be better as there is a large anomalous result in the data set (p4 has scored 28).
This would distort the mean value making it unrepresentative of the data set as a whole
OR
* recall of words cannot be classed as interval data as not all words are equally difficult/easy to recall.
As the data is ordinal, the median should be used rather than the mean.
Using an example, explain what is meant by retroactive interference.
[3 marks]
Possible content:
* when new/recently stored information disrupts/affects the recall of old/previously stored information
* more likely if competing information is similar.
Plus
1 mark for an appropriate example.