Attachment: Animal studies of attachment: Lorenz and Harlow. Flashcards

1
Q

Define altricial

A

animals that are born undeveloped and need constant care like humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define prococial

A

animals walk as soon as their born like geese

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Aim of Lorenz’ study

A

Lorenz wanted to investigate the mechanism of imprinting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

lorenz procedure:

A
  • 12 eggs used
  • Lorenz took a large group of geese eggs and kept them in an incubator until they hatched
  • half were then pplaced under the mother goose while other half stayed with Lorenz so he would be the first moving object that they saw
  • when the4y hatched, Lorenz imitated mother goose. e.g. quacking noises and observed their behaviour
  • he marked the goslings to determine who had imprinted on him and who imprinted on goose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

IV and DV of Lorenz’ study

A

IV= whether, when first hatched they saw mother goose or Lorenz as first moving object

DV= imprinting behvaiour/time taken to imprint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Lorenz results:

A
  • immediately after hatching, the naturally hatched baby geese went straight to mother and incubated followed Lorenz, same after all placed in one box and then free to move
  • the bond was irreversible
  • Lorenz found there was a critical period for imprinting to occur (4-25 hrs)
  • Found those who imprinted on humans would attempt to mate with humans
  • after 32 hrs imprinting turned off
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Harlow aim

A

wanted to investigate whether attachments were primarily formed through food as explaining by learning theory or comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Harlow procedure

A
  • 8 monkeys separated from mothers immediately after birth and placed in individual cages with access to 2 surrogate mothers, one made from wire and one from cloth
  • animals studied for 165 days
  • monkeys were placed in 4 conditions but the main one was wire mother could give food and cloth could not

IV= wire or cloth mother
DV= amount of time with each mother

  • monkeys were frightened with loud noises to test mother preference
  • also placed in larger cage to test exploration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Results of Harlows study

A
  • preferred cloth mother despite lack of feeding
  • would only go to wire monkey when hungry
  • spent approx 15 hrs a day with cloth and only 1-2 with wire a day
  • monkeys with only wire had diarrhea which is a sign of stress
  • when in large cage, would explore with cloth mother
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluation Lorenz: Limitation: Generalisability

A

P: Very difficult to generalise to human beings from research with geese.
E: This is because we have qualitative differences that make each species too dissimilar - arguments of evolutionary discontinuity state extrapolation of findings is not possible.

E: For instance, geese can fly and have wings, that make for very species specific behaviour that will affect the attachment process. What’s more geese can walk as soon as they are born - which will undoubtedly affect the attachment process in comparison to humans (humans are more dependent on their caregivers for survival).

L: As a result, we need to be careful when applying these findings to humans, weakening the credibility this research provides to attachment theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluation Lorenz: Strength: Reliability

A

P: A strengths is that Lorenz’s research into imprinting is highly reliable.
E: This is because his study can be replicated due to the use of standardised procedures that he employed.

E: For instance, Lorenz took half a clutch of geese eggs and put them under the mother goose in their nest and hatched the other half in an incubator. When they hatched he called out to them and made geese noises to attract them as the first moving object they saw.

L: This ultimately means the work on imprinting can be carefully replicated and checked for consistency (which is exactly what Hess did with ducklings in 1960’s findings similar results).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluation Lorenz: Strength: Applications

A

P: There are many practical and theoretical applications of this work.
E: Lorenz’s findings reiterate the importance of the early formative years of an infant’s life and how important they can be for development and survival. He is also often credited for igniting a host of further attachment research.

E: For example, Hess (1960’s) later showed that unborn ducklings can process auditory information before hatching - which has been applied and verified with human foetus (from 24 weeks of gestation).

L: This implies Lorenz research has been instrumental in our knowledge of attachment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluation Lorenz: Limitation: Ecological Validity

A

Many aspects of Lorenz’s research contains high levels of ecological validity, as the geese’s environment after birth was very similar to how it would have been for that species if he hadn’t intervened. For instance, they had access to lakes and rivers and were foraging for food.
However, the findings do not relate to real life human attachment behaviour, and as such could be criticised for lacking credibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation Lorenz

Limitation: Ethical Issues

A

P: Many argue that the research is unethical.
E: Ethical guidelines state psychologists should minimise discomfort to animals as much as possible and removing the goslings from their mothers could have unwanted effects in adulthood - e.g. the foraging problems as well as abnormal reproductive behaviours Lorenz found.

E: Nowadays, researchers are obliged to procure animals from designated licensed establishments, we are unsure as to where Lorenz sourced his goslings.

L: Coupled with the fact generalisations to humans is very difficult, Lorenz’s research has many ethical and moral dilemmas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Qualitative findings of Harlows study

A

Qualitative Findings:
The monkeys preferred contact with the cloth mother when given a choice, regardless of whether she produced the milk. They would only go to the wire mother when hungry.

Monkeys with only a wire mother had diarrhoea, a sign of stress.

When frightened, the monkeys took refuge with the cloth mother in conditions where she was available.

When in the larger cage, the monkeys would explore more when the cloth mother was present and would return to her more frequently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation Harlow:

Limitation: Generalisability

A

Many suggest evolutionary continuity allows us to generalise results from monkeys to human attachment behaviours, due to minimal quantitative differences. Not only do we share over 98% of genes with monkeys, but they also use social bonds and multiple attachments to ensure survival - just like humans. Meaning the research findings about comfort over food is applicable to human attachment process.

However, due to evolutionary discontinuity it is difficult to generalise findings from monkeys to human attachment because of overwhelming qualitative differences across species. For example, anatomical brain differences show humans have added extras within the language centres (e.g. Broca’s area) that influence the attachment process, which no other species possess to such an extent. As language is critical for attachment formation Harlow’s research is difficult to apply to human attachment.

16
Q

Evaluation Harlow:

Strength: Reliability

A

P: The study of monkeys was set up in a controlled environment so has a high level of reliability.
E: Standardised procedures were used in setting up the conditions which all the individual monkeys were exposed to

E: For example, their access to the wire and/or cloth mother and a mother that provided milk, and same experience of exposure to loud sounds and scary toys.

L: This means the results can be considered to have more value to help us understand attachment behaviour studied, and we can check for consistency of findings.

17
Q

Evaluation Harlow:

Strength: Applications

A

P: The findings of Harlow’s research have multiple practical and theoretical applications.
E: For instance, they underline the importance of contact and physical comfort for infants (as well as feeding).

E: There are also useful applications in zoos as well as other conservation attempts by highlighting the important of keeping the young in contact with caregivers or surrogates to support healthy development wherever possible.

L: Hence, despite the unethical nature of research, the findings can help society in many ways, furthering our understanding of attachment behaviours in infants.

18
Q

Evaluation Harlow:

Limitation: Ecological Validity

A

P: One of the problems with research conducted in artificial lab studies is that there is low ecological validity.
E: This is because Harlow set up a situation where he separated infant monkeys from their mothers and isolated them in a cage with access only to the cloth and wire mothers.

E: This is not a situation that would normally happen even if monkeys were orphaned and brought up in captivity; they would have others look after them and not be in such distressing, isolating circumstances.

L: This therefore suggests the attachment behaviours recorded would not reflect real life behaviour even if separated from an attachment figure in captivity and can therefore give us little valuable information about human attachments, so lacks credibility.

19
Q

Evaluation Harlow:

Limitation: Ethical Issues

A

P: The monkeys in the research were arguably subject to harm in both the ST and LT and were exposed to aversive stimuli and stressful procedures.
E: E.g. in the ST they were purposefully stressed as infants to test the attachment; and in the LT being taken away from their mothers and raised in unnatural cages had long lasting psychological effects, including abusing their own infants as adults.

E: According to the Animal (scientific procedures) act (1986; 2012), these procedures should be avoided at all costs, especially when naturally occurring case studies of human infants existed (i.e., orphan studies).

L: Hence, this kind of research can be seen as detrimental to the monkeys and the harm caused to them may not justify the means.